Windows 1.0 — November 1985
In the beginning was the
Nonetheless, it got a cautious welcome. The bundled applications stood up well against their equivalents, especially at the all-in price of around £70, and the multitasking worked — after a fashion. It was very crude with no way to stop any application taking as much time as it liked and starving the others, but it did work well enough to effectively kill off the eight other multitasking DOS add-ons that were around at the time. Likewise the windowing system was hopelessly restricted by any modern standard — it only let windows tile against each other with no overlap. There weren't many of them.
There was one third-party Windows application at launch and for some time thereafter: In-A-Vision, by Micrographx. A CAD program, it shipped with a run-time version of Windows months before Windows itself was separately available. It cost thousands of dollars but was still seen as the best going for the price — and there was always that rumour that Micrographx was working on something a little more mainstream.
First use of: Virtually nothing. Graphics, menus, pointers
and multitasking applications were all innovations in the MS-DOS world
when announced in 1983, but had all appeared in other forms by the
software's arrival in 1985.
Mainstream use of: The word
'vapourware'. Back then, a two year delay between announcement and
launch was generally seen as eighteen months too long. Little did we
know.
Last use of: an operating system that, when loaded, used less than 200k of memory.
Windows 2.0 — December 1987
[? /*CMS poll(20004068) */
?]This was more like it. Icons, overlapping windows and better DOS
application support might look like minor innovations from the
hindsight of 2005, but they were big news in a world where the Apple
Macintosh was starting to make a cult of itself. Still only 16 colours
— the total multimedia support — which caused raucous laughter among
the Amiga owners (They may yet be able to raise a chortle with
Microsoft's excitement over transparent windows in Vista).
The really exciting thing, and one that made Windows 2.0 strictly an interim product, was the announcement of Microsoft OS/2 — an operating system that provided "the power of minicomputer systems" to PCs. And it was more than just that — it was the next stage in Microsoft's partnership with IBM. "With IBM's announcement of the availability of IBM Operating System/2(TM) to end-users in the first quarter of 1988, this toolkit will be extremely important to developers," said Steven Ballmer, vice-president of systems...
For more, click here...





Talkback
Windows XP is 5.1 not 4.0
Windows 95 == Windows 4.0
Windows 98 == Windows 4.1
Windows ME == Windows 4.9 (um, yeah, right...)
Windows XP == Windows _NT_ 5.1
Oh, and Windows was stilled strongly attached to DOS through the entire 9.x series (even ME was tied to various internal DOS structures; it simply removed the ability to not load windows, which was kind of a stupid step backwards...)
"Windows XP is 5.1 not 4.0"
Windows 95 (4.0) was planed to merge NT and the DOS based Windows into one product. It didn't work as you may already know. But that's what XP had done. Read at the end of the Windows 3.1 section to see where it was mentioned.
let us not forget Windows 1.03,
"Last use of: DOS. It's still in there, but when was the last time you opened the box?"
You really want to know? i have opened dos about 15 times already today and it is only 3pm!
i have been configging 3 Windows Server 2003 machines and a windows server laptop!
Ipconfig is a much used and needed instrument that is only any use in an MS DOS window!
Win2k anyone?