Microsoft makes source code plea to EC

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Microsoft has offered to make its Windows server source code available to people licensing its server interoperability protocols, in its latest attempt to achieve compliance with 2004's European antitrust ruling.

Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel, said on Wednesday that anyone licensing information about its server protocols will also be able to see how Microsoft itself has implemented the protocols.

"The source code is the DNA of Windows server operating systems," he said. "We are licensing it to our direct competitors so they can learn from it when creating their implementations of our protocols."

Microsoft has already offered to provide 12,000 pages of technical documentation and 500 hours of technical support to companies that wish to implement its server interoperability protocols, according to Smith. He said Microsoft was not obliged to provide the source code, but decided to, despite the fact that it is "very valuable".

In December 2005 the European Commission said that the instructions that Microsoft had submitted for server interoperability were "incomplete and inaccurate" and said that it may impose a daily fine of up to €2m (£1m) if Microsoft did not provide documentation that satisfies the EC by 25 January.

Earlier this week, Microsoft was given an extra three weeks before a decision would be made over its compliance. If it fails, it will once again face the threat of a massive fine.

The European Commission said it would "study carefully" Microsoft's announcement, once it has seen the full details. It also indicated that it isn't prepared to lift the pressure on the software giant.

"The Commission is looking forward to receiving, no later than 15 February, 2006, Microsoft’s reply to the Statement of Objections sent by the Commission on 21st December 2005."

The Free Software Foundation, which has kept lobbing for Microsoft to reveal its server protocols, was unimpressed by this latest move.

"The European Commission asked Microsoft to publish their protocols to allow others to write interoperable software and to reestablish competition. That does not appear to have happened, at least the terms under which the protocols are not clear," said the FSF in a statement.

"What they have done instead is publish source code, which no-one ever asked them to do. Furthermore they do it in a way that makes the situation worse for free software: because that source code is under Microsoft copyright, developers who have seen the source code could not reimplement it in free software for fear of copyright violation.

"It actually seems more likely Microsoft will eventually try to shut down competition by making claims of copyright infringement based on the argument that "the developer could have looked at the source code.

"So it much resembles a holdup where you ask the robber to please put away their gun and they toss you a grenade instead," the FSF added.

Talkback

Well Microsoft is not used to compete. Thats why the share stock have fallen like a rock during the years. So sell all your stocks if you have any.

If the monopol situation in the desktop area and so becomes solved for once. We will see a ship sink faster and faster. A company whith no invoation or goals is doomed to die. So no wonder it fights back. But its dommed anyway. Peoples, companys and countrys are tired of the overall situation. Free software here we come

via Facebook 25 January, 2006 21:21
Reply

It is the responsibility of the toothless governements to protect its citizens against life threatening companies. As we are dependent (through econmic and market engineering) on Microsoft Software it should be put by force into the public domain where it can be properly accessed and assesed and where required improved.

Failure to do so will make the EU and Microsoft liable for damages, there legal caveats are no longer acceptable.

via Facebook 26 January, 2006 03:14
Reply

Don't hold your breath waiting for compliance from M$.
They will drag it out and delay as long as possible to
keep competition away. All they want is for the world to use their product alone, regardless of its crappiness.

via Facebook 26 January, 2006 14:03
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

56 minutes ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

9 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

11 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

11 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

13 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

15 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

16 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

16 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

16 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

18 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

19 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint