Google seems to want special treatment on Internet Explorer, according to Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer.
His remarks centred on the default search engine in the Web browser. Right now, when people update their version of IE to IE 7, the software won't change their default search settings. "If you pick Yahoo, it will stay on Yahoo," Ballmer said in a hallway conversation on Thursday, after a speech he gave at the Churchill Club in Santa Clara, California.
Google, however, has complained about how the system works. The complaints could be taken as a disguised way to help that company grow its segment in search, Ballmer suggested.
"Google wants us to prompt the users to change the defaults. They want to see a list of search providers, with the No. 1 search provider listed first," said Ballmer, who was speaking generally and not recounting a formal meeting or discussion with Google executives.
IE 7 offers a list of search sites that can become a user's default search engine. The list is alphabetical, so Google is listed after some (such as Ask.com) but before others, including MSN.com. IE 7 also doesn't actively suggest to a user that they can change their default based on their recent search histories or other behaviour.
Sergey Brin, one of the co-founders of Google, used the "M" word — "monopoly" — to describe Microsoft at a press event on Wednesday, and said the software maker didn't necessarily play fair in certain situations.
Google and the growth of the advertising market were one of the primary topics of discussion at the Churchill Club event on Thursday. Microsoft is third right now in Internet advertising. The software company hopes to turn that around by developing its own ad network to create a mass marketplace on the Web. It's also working on software tools and alliances with content providers and online stores to push the effort.
"We want to make sure there is good, healthy competition in the advertising space," Ballmer said. "Everybody deserves good competition. People have been telling me that for years."
Not every bit of technology will be supported by advertising, he said. Even though Microsoft will have ad-supported applications, a lot of people will want a standard desktop Office.
"Can you imagine writing a letter to someone," he said. "'Hey, Mom, I am upset with the gun policy.' Then an ad pops up and says, 'Hey, do you want to buy a gun?'"
The Microsoft chief spoke on a range of other topics:
- Ballmer likes social-networking site FaceBook. "I've spent a lot of time studying FaceBook. I think there is a lot we can learn from the FaceBook concept." As for file-sharing service BitTorrent, it's "very interesting, but I'm not sure where is goes as a business," he said. Ditto for YouTube. "It's fascinating. Anything that can capture consumer interest like that," he said. But it remains unclear how to turn the video Web site into a business proposition. Microsoft will continue to buy start-ups, of which it bought 22 last year, he added. Open source keeps Ballmer awake at night. Right now, Microsoft trails the open source community in software for high-performance computer clustering and some other server technologies, he acknowledged. But future versions of Windows will try to close that gap, he said.
The competition between Microsoft and Linux, he added, is based mostly on technology and not philosophical differences. Ultimately, that helps Microsoft, he indicated, because it then becomes a battle over features.
"We looked at open source and said, 'Is this a religious competition? No, it is a good old-fashioned engineering competition,'" he said. "It is hard to beat open source for cost of acquisition. It is not hard to beat open source on total cost of ownership."
Microsoft, however, doesn't have a lot of interest in dipping deep into that area. "We can't embrace the open-source business model. That is inconsistent with being a commercial company," he said.
- Meanwhile, IBM remains one of Microsoft's biggest challengers in the corporate space. The competition comes either directly from Big Blue or from companies that have adopted its technology, Ballmer said. Microsoft is still a growth company, he noted, saying that in the past five years, its profits have grown 80 percent. The company's percentage of the profits of the top 23 tech companies has also increased, from 18 percent to 23 percent.
The software maker isn't likely to see 20 percent growth because of its size, but 8 percent to 10 percent annual growth is realistic. "I think our numbers are pretty good," Ballmer said.
- The Vista update to Windows and the upcoming version of Office will cost about the same as current versions once they are released. The student/teacher version of Office will also be folded into the home edition, he added. Microsoft's secret weapon? It doesn't sleep. "We have a tenacity and a persistence and patience to stay after it and stay after it and stay after it," Ballmer said. The company, he added, is quite patient. Patience "is what distinguishes us from many technology companies that are important", Ballmer said.






Talkback
Google is already integrated into Firefox and Safari, working brilliantly. Who cares about IE7 - nobody is going to use more buggy browsers from Microsoft anyway.
Open source, standards compliant browsers are where all the interesting things are happening. Even when IE7 is released it will have less functionality than Firefox has now.
Well, I think that Google are doing a Microsoft here :O
The list of search engines listed alphabetically sounds pretty fair to me, especially if Microsoft's own offering appears after Google's!
If it went MSN, Ask, ..., Google, then I think they would have something to complain about, but this just sounds like sour grapes...
Likewise, if the user has already selected a default for IE6, why should they be prompted to change when upgrading to IE7? Should it also prompt for every single bookmark to make sure the user hasn't changed their mind on them as well?
With their integration into other browsers such as FF and Safari, I don't really think they've got anything to complain about - in fact I think they should keep their mouths shut in case somebody looks deeper.
I've not been impressed with Microsoft of late, I still don't see Vista as having caught up with Linux and OS X desktops from what I've seen.
Microsoft have done a lot of shady things in the past, I don't think anybody can deny that, but in this instance I think Google are abusing Microsoft's reputation and track record unfairly for their own gain.
Google started out looking like a benevolent organisation, now they seem to be slowly shaking off the lamb suit to expose a voracious wolf underneath.
"It is hard to beat open source for cost of acquisition. It is not hard to beat open source on total cost of ownership." Ballmer still claims the TCO of windows
is less than Linux. Companies I know that use Windoze
have more admins than companies using Linux. Maybe they pay them a lot less, for having to know less. Ask a Linux admin about downtime and he will ask, "what is that?" Windoze admin will tel you in days per month.