The Federation Against Software Theft (FAST) has threatened to prosecute educational establishments that use improperly licensed software.
The pressure group, which lobbies on behalf of the proprietary software industry, has threatened to take headteachers, schools and local education authorities (LEAs) to court if they are found to have any unauthorised software.
"The message is clear: if head teachers, schools governors and even LEAs allow the use of illegal software then it may be a fast track to a criminal record," said John Lovelock, director general of FAST.
"The government has given us the tools to support this initiative with the Copyright and Trade Marks (Offences and Enforcement) Act 2002, which increased the penalties for certain copyright offences from two years to 10 years... and strengthened search warrant provisions."
FAST claims this is the first campaign of its type to target primary and secondary schools. The group claims the software industry is "at a huge risk from the availability of illegal downloads".
To underline its threat, FAST pointed out that it is running a process called Operation Tracker, which it calls the "CCTV of the Internet". The system enables the pressure group to trace file sharers by identifying their Internet connection.
FAST's clampdown attracted criticism from one expert working in the open source educational field, who called the scheme "disastrous".
"From a marketing perspective, it is a disastrous move than cannot fail to annoy and upset a critical sector. Presumably this is why it is outsourced by big business interests," said Mark Taylor, president of the Open Source Consortium, a group that represents the interests of open source vendors in the public sector.
Taylor said that while FAST has a legal right to chase those who haven't paid licensing fees for proprietary software, the methods it is employing may be counterproductive.
"The message is threatening, both overtly and subliminally. Anyone who has worked with LEAs, head teachers and school governors knows that they are honest, hard working, harassed and generally worried individuals," said Taylor. "Associating them with criminal intent is... well, eyebrow-raising, to say the least."
Taylor said that education professionals are focused on dealing with "violence, drugs, bullying, truancy, shrinking budgets and escalating government regulations", not "worrying about whether they've got licences for anything anyone has ever installed on their ageing networks".
Taylor said that if he represented a school on the receiving end of these threats he would start researching open source software.
"I'd begin to move away from the people locking me into proprietary solutions whilst threatening me with criminal proceedings, and towards open standards, open source-based software that gives me options, dramatically and permanently lowers my costs, and won't get me a criminal record."
The Open Source Consortium works with the British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA) to discuss the uptake and use of open source software in education.
A BECTA spokesman told ZDNet UK: "BECTA has regular meetings with the Schoolforge-UK Open Source Consortium Education Working Group representative to update the open source community about what the organisation is doing and so they can keep us informed of open source activities."






Talkback
FAST is a PROFIT making business NOT an organisation working for the Law or Government
They use scare tactics to get businesses and organisation to use their services.
Software companies should supply their products Free to all Schools and collages, that way our students can evaluate and make up their own mind on the best products to use.
FAST is a PROFIT making business NOT an organisation working for the Law or Government
They use scare tactics to get businesses and organisation to use their services.
Software companies should supply their products Free to all Schools and collages, that way our students can evaluate and make up their own mind on the best products to use.
Open Source companies DO supply their software products free to schools, not only for evaluation by students, but permanently and in perpetuity. The Open Source business model is simply, and understandable. Services that you need to USE your software are what you pay for.
Hardware has become commodity, you can get a complete system for a few hundred pounds (even less when you consider you are paying for an operating system with it whether you want it or not).
Software is becoming commodity. Open Source recognises that the marginal cost of reproduction of software is.... well, nothing. And the value is in what you DO with it - tell me, how much is your software package 'worth' when your proprietary vendor pulls support for it?
No, Open Source recognises that what the customer wants, is the services (or know-how) to actually do what they got hardware and software to do in the first place. And that is what Open Source businesses charge for - the deployment, maintenance and support of world-class collaboratively developed software.
http://www.opensourceconsortium.org is the site for the organisation mentioned in the article.
Ten years jail sentence? I just checked the statistics and the average sentence for rape is six years. Something is seriously wrong with a society that places a higher value on dodgy software than brutal assault. I hope that teachers are pointing out this to their students...
This is exactly why schools in Portland, Oregon (USA) moved to GNU/Linux and K12LTSP. They were directly threatened by Microsoft with an audit and a thinly veiled attempt to extort them into buying into "Software Assurance" and "Licensing 6.0". It made national news here in this country. After the schools started migrating, and after many angry phone calls to Microsoft HQ in Redmond, the company made the audit "optional" and "with no time limit."
http://www.k12ltsp.org/
The OpenOffice.org folks also have a solution to prevent those "criminal" educators from downloading proprietary software illegally.
http://why.openoffice.org/
Get Legal! Get Free Software!
The motto of business is, was, and always will be: the uninformed consumer is our best friend. Business does not seek to support education - but instead to do the only thing it knows and cares how to do: exploit, exploit, exploit! Students are not human beings - what does "human being" mean?, asks the puzzled businessman. - Students are consumers, potential customers. This subject is far beyond worth talking about.
Very good. The more the public gets to know about what nowedays commercial licencing, software patents, IP and such is really about the more likely it is they know who to vote for next. However, so far history has proven that ignorance and stupidity rules so my hopes for some real effective and lasting voting aren't that high.
"Software companies should supply their products Free to all Schools and collages, that way our students can evaluate and make up their own mind on the best products to use."
That worked for Oracle. If they hadn't made their Relational Database free to education establishments back in the early 70s, we wouldn't all be living now with the tyranny of the Codd/Date model being the only database model taught in higher education, despite there being far better alternatives.
My kids insist on using (a paid up copy of) MS Office at home simply because that is what their school uses. If more schools go to OpenOffice out of licence concerns, that's a whole tranch of parents who won't need to shell out for an MS product. Which may not be best news for those funding FAST.
Present toes. Bang. Ouch.