Counterfeiters aren't Microsoft's only opponents in its effort to combat improper software licensing: Some of its customers are against it, too.
The company is forging ahead with a programme, Windows Genuine Advantage, tied to its free software downloads and updates, that checks whether the Windows installation on a PC is legitimately licensed. But some people, including some who say they own a legitimately acquired copy of Windows, have challenged the need for such validation.
Most of their criticism is directed at the way Microsoft's anti-counterfeiting technology, Windows Genuine Advantage, interacts with a PC. Recently, the software maker was lambasted over its WGA Notifications tool, which it pushes out as a "high priority" update alongside security fixes. There have also been complaints about the tool collecting information from PCs and causing system troubles.
"The issue is not that they are trying to reduce the number of pirated copies. It's the unethical way in which they go about it," wrote a reader of ZDNet UK sister site CNET News.com reader using the name "jabbotts", in response to a recent story on Microsoft's antipiracy efforts.
But there is more going on than just talk. Some Windows users have started to search for ways around the antipiracy technology, setting up a struggle between Microsoft and WGA opponents. Since the 2004 introduction of the WGA programme, multiple hacks and tricks to circumvent the piracy check or to remove the software have been published on the Internet. And the hunt for effective workarounds appears to be continuing.
Windows Genuine Advantage is a stepped-up effort by Microsoft to boost the number of Windows users who actually pay for the operating system. The company has said that roughly a third of Windows copies worldwide have not been acquired legitimately — as a boxed product or bundled onto a machine, for example.
Microsoft has gradually expanded its efforts against counterfeiting. Today, Windows users must have their PC electronically approved before they can download add-on Microsoft software such as Windows Media Player and Windows Defender. WGA excludes security updates from this requirement. When the anti-counterfeiting programme started, validation was optional for downloads.
As the programme has grown, so have efforts to circumvent it. One Web site, for example, lists 15 methods — including step-by-step directions and links to file downloads — to disable Microsoft's copyright-check tools and WGA Notifications warning messages.
One of the listed methods is to install the "905474.exe" program. This "crack" was also suggested by readers providing story feedback. The file, named after the number for the support article for WGA on Microsoft's Web site, is widely available on the Internet. (Caution: CNET News.com hasn't tested this application, and it isn't wise to install files from sources that aren't known and trusted.)
"I have licences for all my PCs," wrote reader "kamwmail-cnet1". But citing a lack of trust in Microsoft, this reader installed the 905474.exe tool. "Install this hack. Boot your PC. You're in business, private business," the reader added.
Other proposals to defeat the piracy checks vary from the simple — such as blocking the Microsoft applications using firewall software — to the more complex, such as replacing files that are part of the checking tools with cracked versions of those files. Some methods require changes to the Windows Registry, which calls for more advanced technical knowledge on the part of the PC owner.
The hacks and workarounds are a sign of the indignation among some Microsoft users, including some readers.
"A few days after the first WGA notification program was released, a workaround was found, so Microsoft reworked the program so the workaround doesn't work, then pushes the software onto people's systems under the guise that it's a critical update," wrote a reader using the nickname "thedreaming".
"It's not a critical update to users, just (to) Microsoft," the reader added.
Some readers say the workarounds are functional, but it isn't clear if they all are. A cautionary note on the Web page that listed 15 ways to bypass WGA also warned that, with the new releases of WGA, some cracks no longer work. It is even possible that some of the hacks will work for one user, but not for another, according to the Web site. CNET News.com did not test any of the workarounds.
Stepped-up effort
Microsoft advanced its anti-counterfeiting programme in November last year, when it started pushing out a tool called WGA Notifications alongside its security updates. The tool has been sent millions of Windows users in a number of countries. In April, the US joined the list of covered territories, as did the UK, Malaysia, Australia and New Zealand.
The first time a computer owner runs WGA to check if their version of Windows is genuine, the software sends data on the system back to Microsoft. This information covers the Windows XP product key, the maker of the PC, the operating system version, PC bios information and the user's local setting and language. Microsoft discloses that this information is transferred in its WGA tool licence.
In past weeks, reports have emerged that the WGA Notifications software connects to a Microsoft server each time the PC is started — something Microsoft didn't previously disclose. Also, as it has become clear that the tool isn't a finished product, millions of Windows users may unwittingly be subjects in a trial run for a Microsoft anti-counterfeiting program.
This has irked some people, even those who have acknowledged Microsoft's right to fight counterfeiting and who have supported the WGA program in the past. Users shouldn't be pushed into being guinea pigs, many readers argued.
"I spent several hours trying to fix an office machine which slowed to a crawl or froze after this update was installed," wrote reader "umbramistweave", in response to a story about the prerelease status of WGA Notifications. "It's beta. It's flawed. It should not have been released as an update."
Other readers also reported PC trouble after installing the WGA software.
"Windows Update should only be used for delivering completed, non-beta software, period," wrote CNET News.com reader "john55440".
In response to the criticism, Microsoft maintains that there is a real benefit in validating a copy of Windows.
"Our experience is that customers — as long as the process is understandable, unobtrusive, quick and painless — appreciate not only their copy of Windows more, but also appreciate Microsoft more," David Lazar, director of the Windows Genuine program at Microsoft, said last week.
That comment brought out some zealots. One reader, using the nickname "imacpwr" wrote: "Mac just keeps looking better and better and better... That's it Microsoft, just keep shooting yourself in the foot. Before you know it you'll be on your knees begging the public to come back."






Talkback
People should wake up to the fact that software piracy is theft. If everyone who used Windows XP actually paid for it, then MS could charge less for it, benefiting everyone.
There is too much piracy of software, music and films. It is about time something was actually done about it.
softstag - software piracy isn't theft. No-one is denied access to property as a result of piracy. Stop being so alarmist. There is no evidence that a pirated copy is a lost sale.
Athough I haven't installed WGA, the most recent security updates seem to have messed up Internet Explorer - and it crashes on launch now - but Hey! Firefox is completely unaffected! Way to go Microsoft.
How to boil a frog? Slowly but surely.
Microsoft should get though and quick about where they really want to end up. Thus making their entire message clear beforehand. This one step forward, two steps back approach isn't really helping anyone.
Microsoft should be supported in their actions. After all, they do have the right to control the use of their own copyrighted software.
I recently put together an old machine for my parents-in-law and naturally I installed Ubuntu as a user-friendly desktop Linux. It is perfect for their needs of accessing the web, e-mail and writing the odd letter.
This happens all the time, the only difference being that many people would use an old copy of Windows instead of Linux. But now Microsoft are enforcing their copyright we can expect to see an increase in Linux usage and a decrease in Windows usage.
Who'd have thought Microsoft would be deliberately encouragig people to move to Linux? Well, I'm not complaining...
To Softstag post
Piracy is not theft! It's Copy Right Infringement! If everyone paid for Windows, Microsoft wouldn't reduce the price they would just enjoy a lager profit margin! Think of the root of the problem why people used pirated software, the companies charge too much! Times have changed, the production and distriubtion costs are different to what they used to be and yet they charge the same price. How do you justify that? I don't support piracy but I DO UNDERSTAND why people do it. Piracy is what prevents the companies Microsoft or anyone else from sending prices sky high. By this I mean higher than they are already.
I'm with MM on this one.
I wouldnt mind the WGA if it actually worked consistently. After months of passing the check on patch tuesday my copy of windows failed validation. After repeated attempts to rectify that situation I finally uninstalled the Internet Explorer Beta I have been using and tried with IE6 only to pass the validation process which it should have in the first place as I have a fully legal copy.
I know IE7 is still at beta 2 stage but surely it should work with Microsofts Own WGA tool. I submitted a bug report to microsoft after complaining vehemently to microsoft on the phone but have yet to hear anything back from them.
Yes Microsoft has the right to fight piracy but the WGA tool is just another nail in the coffin of my respect for Microsoft. I am seriously considering going to dual boot with Linux so that I may eventually give up on Microsoft.
Microsoft Software is far too expensive to the average user.
As an example, a typical installation used by a school (without server licences and cals), if it had to be bought retail breaks down thus:
244.97 windows xp professional with sp2 (web exclusive price!)
370.97 Microsoft office 2003 pro (again web exclusive), That's over £600!
Who can justify these kind of prices?
Legally these are what are charged if you want to upgrade a machine. An OEM licence is for a new machine only.
Dc where the hell are you buying your copies of windows and office from?!!
you should buy them from ebay, i get them for 5 quid each, they come on these nice blue CDs with silver sides and bill gates' own hand writing on them he even gave me the CD key
FCKGW - RHQQ2 - YXRKT - 8TG6W - 2B7Q8
i decided to take a picture of it, it is totally authentic!
http://www.rootminus1.com/freepics/albums/Random/devilsownXP.jpg
I gave good feedback!
Software piracy DOES reduce sales of software, that i can guarantee, for music it increases my purchases but for software it either stops me buying it when i get a pirated version or else if i cant find the software i dont bother with it. if i am desparate for it i may find an alternative but if i can pirate the software i wont buy it, unless it is really good!
We spend our lives being Microsoft's test bed for their software, we then get the honour of buying the next version that we beta tested for them over the year!