Where on the horizon is Vista?

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS

Just when is Windows Vista going to ship?

That's likely just one of many questions on the minds of investors waiting for Microsoft's annual meeting for financial analysts on Thursday.

High on the list of questions will be Vista's general stability, number of third party drivers and some potentially jarring features.

The arrival date for Vista, also top of mind for tech enthusiasts and the entire computing industry, may not get much clearer this week, however.

Officially, Microsoft said last week that it is sticking to its most recently announced schedule of shipping Vista to business customers at the end of this year and launching it for consumers and on new PCs in January.

Few, though, are taking Microsoft at its word.

"Our estimates have already assumed a delay in the Vista launch to March or April," Goldman Sachs analyst Rick Sherlund said in a research note Friday. Market researcher Gartner said in May that the full launch of Vista could be pushed back until the second quarter of next year.

Even chairman Bill Gates, during a recent swing through South Africa, pegged the chances of a January launch at only 80 percent.

The big concern is that Vista, though it has all its features in place, is still not ready for prime time. The company has gotten credit from enthusiasts for some changes made in an interim test build released earlier this month. But concerns linger, including whether there will be enough third-party drivers and how stable the operating system will be.

There has also been concern over a new feature known as user account control (UAC), which enables more users to run in standard mode rather than as administrators. But people both inside and outside the company have complained that users are too often prompted for administrator credentials.

Even as it is publicly sticking to its schedule, Redmond is also stressing that a further delay would not amount to a financial disaster.

"If we were to see a slip, let's say, of a quarter, to give you a financial magnitude, we think that would have an impact of around $200 (million) to $400 million," chief financial officer Chris Liddell said during a conference call with analysts. "So obviously, (it's) revenue that we'd like to see but not significant in an overall way."

There are similar, though less intense, concerns around Office 2007. Office, like Vista, was originally set to ship in time for this Christmas season.

The company delayed Office back in March, the same week it pushed back Vista. At the time, the company said Office development was still on track and that the change in timing was a marketing decision. However, late last month, the company said it had encountered new performance concerns and would not finish development work until year-end, rather than in October, threatening a January launch as well.

Looming larger, from a financial perspective, are the added investments Microsoft plans to make in the current fiscal year to better compete against Google, among other things. Microsoft first outlined its spending plans in its April earnings report. At the time, though, Microsoft was cagey about where the extra billions of dollars were going.

Spending details
Last week, Liddell offered a bit more clarity, breaking down about $2.7bn (£1.5bn) worth of added spending. Included in that is $450m in product launch and marketing costs as Microsoft updates Windows and Office. Another $450m is earmarked for growing its overall sales and marketing strength. And $500m will go to online-services investments, including its AdCenter ad-serving tool, its search engine, Office Live, Live.com and its CRM Live service.

A further $1bn is for development of "high-growth products, and new products and services" — an umbrella for all kinds of new ventures. That leaves about $300m in general corporate spending and potential acquisitions, Liddell said.

One of the usual questions that is likely to be less pressing this year is what Microsoft plans to do with all its cash. The company answered that for the short term, it will be used toward last week's announcement of a $40bn stock buyback plan, which included an almost immediate plan to reacquire $20bn through a tender offer, and a separate plan to buy another $20bn over several years.

However, investors will certainly be looking for more detail on where all of those investment dollars are going — and more importantly, when some of these investments might pay off.

Microsoft has been investing in its emerging businesses — things like software for televisions, cell phones and midsize businesses — for years. And yet Office and Windows still account for the vast majority of the company's profits.

There is concern that continued investment won't help Microsoft's share price, which has not grown for years. In a report last week, Credit Suisse analyst Jason Maynard said Wall Street is likely to put continued pressure on the company's stock price, relative to its earnings, "until there are signs that the company can generate an adequate return on its emerging businesses".

And profits are not likely to grow with all of that investment. "With the company's business model in transition, we expect little improvement in margins in the coming years," Maynard wrote.

Talkback

Interesting to note that Microsoft is mostly getting its profit from areas where it has market lock-in. That should make a lot of investors nervous because that means that once customers get smart enough to adopt alternatives the walls will be crumbling down very fast.

As for Vista. You might as well get serious with Linux and the rest now. For two reasons. More then likely that'll require less additional staff, training, hardware and (third-party) software purchasements overall in the first year alone. And it'll put you in a much better negotiation position against Microsoft (resellers) should you opt to continue the Vista route with them for some reason or another anyway (being able to say no makes for great discount) once it's finally available in a thrustworthy enough release.

So basically getting serious about Open Source now is money and time well spend. It's going to save you more money one way or another later on if you go about it properly.

In short. This is not the year to sign long-term contracts. And likely neither will next year be.

via Facebook 27 July, 2006 23:41
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

4 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

6 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

6 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

8 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

10 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

11 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

12 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

12 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

13 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

15 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

20 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

22 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

23 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

24 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?