Tackling Microsoft's August patches: Part 1

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS

For August's Patch Tuesday, Microsoft released a dozen security bulletins, rating nine as critical threats. (The remaining three are important threats.) With that many updates in a single month, how do you know which ones to concentrate on first?

Details
Redmond has released so many critical security bulletins this month that space constraints prevent me from addressing them in all one article. For that reason, I'm addressing the ones I find most critical, and will discuss the rest of August's security bulletins in a separate feature.

By the way, Microsoft doesn't number bulletins based on either theoretical or real-world criticality, so the security bulletin numbers are merely placeholders — not a ranking of importance. I'm not debating that these updates are all critical; I'm simply addressing them in what I consider the correct order of significance according to the current threat each poses.

Before we begin, let me give you an idea of the method behind my madness. I first looked at whether anyone is already exploiting the underlying vulnerability. In my opinion, this is the more important factor when it comes to determining the threat level, particularly because these vulnerabilities all contain some remote code execution threats.

Of course, attackers could start exploiting any of the others tomorrow. However, it's unlikely that attacks would take place immediately. In addition, you probably won't want to fix everything at once — at least not before looking over the implications of the patches. In my opinion, the following four security bulletins present the most threat.

MS06-040
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-040, "Vulnerability in Server Service Could Allow Remote Code Execution", addresses a buffer-overrun vulnerability (CVE-2006-3439). This is a critical threat for all affected versions, which includes Windows 2000 SP4, all versions of Windows XP, and all versions of Windows Server 2003.

Strangely enough, while the bulletin states that there has been no public disclosure of this vulnerability, it also states that the company has received reports of active exploits. The bulletin emphasises that this is not a replacement for Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-035, which addressed a similar — but different — problem. Make sure you install both updates.

MS06-042
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-042, "Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer", is a very important update simply because it affects almost everyone. This bulletin addresses a range of vulnerabilities — some privately reported, some known problems:

  • Redirect Cross-Domain Information Disclosure Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3280) — information disclosure
  • HTML Layout and Positioning Memory Corruption Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3450) — remote code execution
  • CSS Memory Corruption Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3451) — remote code execution
  • HTML Rendering Memory Corruption Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3637) — remote code execution
  • COM Object Instantiation Memory Corruption Vulnerability — (CVE-2006-3638) remote code execution
  • Source Element Cross-Domain Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3639) — remote code execution and information disclosure
  • Window Location Information Disclosure Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3640) — information disclosure
  • FTP Server Command Injection Vulnerability (CVE-2004-1166) — elevation of privilege

So far, only one of these threats reportedly has exploit code circulating, and there are no reports of any active exploits at this time.

This security bulletin affects IE 5.01 Service Pack 4 on Windows 2000 SP4 and all versions of IE 6 on Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003. Although the cumulative impact of all of these vulnerabilities…

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

6 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

8 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

8 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

10 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

12 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

13 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

14 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

14 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

15 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

17 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

22 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?