Tackling Microsoft's August patches: Part 2

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS

This month's Patch Tuesday was a busy one. Redmond released a total of 12 security bulletins, rating nine of them as critical threats. (The remaining three bulletins are important threats.) The updates collectively fix 20 flaws in Windows and patch three flaws in Office.

Details
Microsoft released so many critical security bulletins for August's Patch Tuesday that I couldn't address them all immediately. I have covered the four critical security bulletins that I felt presented the most threat in a previous article. In this feature, I'll bring you up to speed on the remaining updates, both critical and important. These bulletins either present a low-level threat or haven't been the target of an active exploit, making them less dangerous than the first four.

MS06-041
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-041, "Vulnerabilities in DNS Resolution Could Allow Remote Code Execution", fixes two vulnerabilities: Winsock Hostname Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3440) and DNS Client Buffer Overrun Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3441). Both are remote code execution threats.

This update affects Windows 2000 Service Pack 4, all versions of Windows XP, and all versions of Windows Server 2003. This is a critical threat for all affected versions. Both vulnerabilities are previously undisclosed threats, and there had been no reports of active exploits for either at the time of publishing.

In addition, an attacker can only exploit the buffer overrun vulnerability on a subnet between the host and the DNS server. Workarounds include blocking DNS record types ATMA, TXT, X25, HINFO, and ISDN DNS at network gateways.

A workaround for the Winsock vulnerability is to modify the Autodial DLL in the registry. See the security bulletin for more details.

MS06-043
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-043, "Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Could Allow Remote Code Execution", addresses the MHTML Parsing Vulnerability (CVE-2006-2766). While this is a critical threat, it only affects Outlook Express 6 on Windows XP SP2 (including the x64 version) and Outlook Express 6 on Windows Server 2003 SP1 (also including the x64 version).

This is a publicly disclosed threat, but there had been no reports of active exploits at the time of publishing. Internet Explorer (IE) runs in a restricted security mode on Windows Server 2003, and Outlook Express opens HTML emails in the Restricted Sites security zone; both factors mitigate the potential risk.

MS06-044
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-044, "Vulnerability in Microsoft Management Console Could Allow Remote Code Execution", fixes the MMC Redirect Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3643). This is a newly disclosed threat, and there had been no reports of active exploits at the time of publishing.

While this is a critical threat, it only affects Windows 2000 SP4. The best way to mitigate this threat is to run IE 6. A good workaround is to disable Active Scripting in the My Computer zone.

MS06-046
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-046, "Vulnerability in HTML Help Could Allow Remote Code Execution", addresses the Buffer Overrun in HTML Help Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3357). This is a publicly disclosed threat, and there had been no reports of active exploits at the time of publishing.

This update affects Windows 2000 SP4, all versions of Windows XP, and all versions of Windows Server 2003. It is a critical threat for Windows 2000 and Windows XP versions, but it's only a moderate threat for Windows Server 2003 versions.

Using the latest, fully patched version of IE or Outlook will mitigate this threat, and the security bulletin offers several workarounds. The most useful one is to disable the HTML Help ActiveX control.

MS06-051
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-051, "Vulnerability in Windows Kernel Could Result in Remote Code Execution", addresses two threats. The User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3443) is a low-threat elevation of privilege threat, while the Unhandled Exception Vulnerability (CVE-2006-3648) is a critical remote code execution threat. Both vulnerabilities are previously undisclosed threats, and there had been no reports of active exploits for either at the time of publishing.

This update affects Windows 2000 SP4, all versions of Windows XP, and all versions of Windows Server 2003. Because of the Unhandled Exception Vulnerability, this is a critical threat for all affected versions.

There are multiple mitigating factors. First of all, an attacker would need valid log-on credentials to exploit the user profile vulnerability. In addition, applying all patches…

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

3 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

5 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

5 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

7 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

9 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

10 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

11 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

11 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

12 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

13 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

19 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

21 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

21 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

23 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

24 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?