Why Vista may be delayed until Easter

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS

The launch of Microsoft's new Vista operating system has been a long time coming. Missing the important pre-Christmas slot earned the software company a lot of criticism from partners and customers but Microsoft has committed to shipping the OS in January. 

But now some analysts claim that a number of "events" in the IT industry have made it more likely that Microsoft may delay the launch of Vista again until at least May next year.

The reservations hinge around a research note, "Events aligning to make Vista delay more likely", published by analyst Gartner late last week, and take in market, political and industry issues that the researcher believes are beginning to stack up.

Gartner is at pains to stress that there is no technical reason it can see why Microsoft should not go ahead with launching Vista in January. The problem lies not with bug-fixing or the last-minute code glitches that normally hold back software releases — it's purely political according to Gartner.

Last week, Gartner published a research note that highlighted the "event" of 8 September, when Microsoft announced it may delay availability of Windows Vista in European Union (EU) countries due to concerns about the product's ability "to comply with European Commission (EC) antitrust regulations".

A delay for Vista now would be convenient for Microsoft, Gartner analyst David Mitchell-Smith suggests, because "when people start complaining about the delay, Microsoft can reasonably say 'don't blame us' and point the finger at the EC". Microsoft is "probably getting a bit tired" of the EU's stance, suggested Mitchell-Smith. "It's not unreasonable to think so."

Also, Microsoft wants to avoid "further litigation", the analyst argues, as it is already facing actions from Symantec/Veritas and Adobe and "while it would go far to settle corporate lawsuits", the analyst argues, "it is less likely to be able to resolve legal action by the EC as easily".

The European issue could prove very "complex" and as a result, Microsoft may delay "broad availability of Windows Vista in all markets, which aligns with Gartner's forecast that Vista will ship in 2Q07".

Microsoft could also decide "that a single code base for everyone would better serve the market and allow business customers to deploy a single image, usable in most of the world", Gartner argues.

Additionally, Microsoft could — and the analysts stress the word "could" — want to appease retailers who may struggle to get Vista into shops for the crucial Christmas period. Holding over until Easter may also be a welcome idea.

According to Gartner, these factors "create an air of reasonable doubt that may serve to prepare the market for the potential eventuality of a slip".

Another issue could be the overall state of the PC market. Last week, Gartner made one of its gloomiest predictions yet on the overall state of the PC market, saying that while worldwide PC shipments are "on pace" to increase by 10.5 percent to 233.7 million units in 2006, worldwide PC revenue is expected to decline by 2.5 percent to $198.3bn.

Gartner blames continuing price sensitivity in the market for the decline. "Unit growth will continue to be price driven for the next several quarters as PC replacement activity wanes and the battle between Intel and AMD escalates," said George Shiffler, research director for Gartner Dataquest's Client Platforms group.

And if the industry is expecting a shot in the arm from the imminent arrival of Vista, which is expected in the first quarter of next year, it should think again, according to Shiffler. "Vista's eventual release next year could stimulate some added growth," said Shiffler, "but we remain sceptical of Vista's impact".

Talkback

don't care

via Facebook 21 September, 2006 01:29
Reply

Isn't this the same company that was saying Microsoft would not ever get Vista out by the begining of the year because of the how complex the code was?
Why should anyone believe them now?

via Facebook 21 September, 2006 13:20
Reply

Why would anyone care if Vista ever arrives?

It is an unusable completely outdated and malware infested platform. Even if it arrives now, next year or the year after it is behind modern OS like Apples by several year and Apple will be raising the bar substantially early in the new year.

Hard to appear competitive when your platform is running on concepts and code obsolete for decades. A simple comparison would be VERY embarrassing especially with the state of the Vista beta and it's likelihood of substantial improvements by next year.

Longhorn / Vista was promised originally for the 2002/2003 time frame with features intended to compete with Apple's OS-X four versions ago. Any of the real improvement have long since been dropped. While Microsoft is still desperate to mimic what it can of Apples innovations they are pale, buggy and crappie imitations of long since replaced or improved concepts.

It has to be very difficult to make a case for Windows with informed clients. No wonder the rats are leaving the Microsoft ship for retirement or anything they can find that isn't a huge embarrassment for them.

via Facebook 21 September, 2006 18:03
Reply

Although it is unlikely that Windows will be challenged as the de-facto desktop, Microsoft is going to find that the open-source offerings (Red Hat and SuSE are still perceived as in the open-source camp) will begin to make some small in-roads into that sector.

At the back-end, the rot has already begun. SuSE and Red Hat are taking market share and as techies are prepared to look more open-mindedly at Linux, we will see a gradual change in the enterprise server rooms.

At the Web back end, not much will change. Windows has never been popular as a web server outside of the intranet. It is barely discernable as a web server on the Internet.

Messaging is 'seeing' new Linux hosted servers coming along, that offer the same collaboration technologies as Exchange, without the high licensing overheads.

Serious database installations will continue to be hosted on UNIX. Microsoft's SQL appeals to the less demanding requirements and where there is a WinTel comfort zone environment.

While I agree with most of the previous writer's arguements/comments, I think that Vista will be very popular on the enterprise and home desktops. It wil be the natural upgrade to XP Pro.

Microsoft still has a long future as the number one software company. But, the times they are a-changing.

via Facebook 23 September, 2006 23:46
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

6 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

7 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

8 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

10 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

11 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

13 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

13 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

13 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

14 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

16 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

22 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

24 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

24 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?