Vista PCs to lock out rogue software

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Windows Vista will have new antipiracy technology that locks people out of their PCs if the operating system isn't activated within 30 days after installation.

If Vista is not activated with a legitimate product registration key in time, the system will run in "reduced functionality mode" until it is activated, said Thomas Lindeman, a senior product manager at Microsoft. In this mode, people will be able to use a Web browser for up to an hour, after which time the system will log them out, he said.

The new technology is part of Microsoft's new "Software Protection Platform", which the company plans to announce on Wednesday. It will be part of future versions of all Microsoft products, but debuts in Windows Vista and Windows Server "Longhorn", said Cori Hartje, director of Microsoft's Windows Genuine Software Initiative. Vista, the successor to Windows XP, is slated to be broadly available in January.

Microsoft has escalated its battle with software pirates during the past two years through the "Genuine Advantage" add-ons for Windows and Office, its biggest cash cows. The company is now expanding its push by baking antipiracy features into its new products and taking more drastic action when it finds that a product was illegitimately acquired.

Many users shouldn't be confronted by Vista's antipiracy technology, however. People who buy a PC with Vista installed from companies such as Dell, HP and Gateway, for example, should find the operating system activated already.

"Everything is going to be good to go right out of the box," Hartje said. "This is more for those who install after the fact."

Those who install Vista themselves, for example on existing PCs, will have a 30-day period to activate the operating system and validate with Microsoft that they have a legitimate licence. "During those 30 days, you get warning messages, it counts down. During the last three days they get very frequent," Lindeman said.

If ignored, after 30 days Vista will display four options. The first will allow the user to activate online, the second is to run in reduced functionality mode, the third is to enter a product key and the fourth displays instructions to activate by phone, Lindeman said.

"In reduced functionality mode, we will let you use your browser for periods of up to an hour before we log you off," Lindeman said.

Barring people from using their PC is a significant change from the antipiracy features that Microsoft bolted on to Windows XP with Windows Genuine Advantage. In XP, the piracy-busting features only put a block on downloading additional programs from Microsoft's Web sites.

Windows XP also included product activation, but people could still use their machine in "safe mode" if the operating system was not activated. Moreover, no activation was required if a volume licence key was used, the most popular way of pirating Windows. Starting with Vista, Microsoft will no longer give out those types of licence keys, which are typically used by larger organisations.

"Piracy is one of the most significant problems facing the software industry," Hartje said. More than a third of all software installed last year was pirated or unlicensed, she said, citing figures from the Business Software Alliance, a software industry group.

Microsoft will continue to check if Vista was legitimately acquired, even after activation. This happens, for example, when downloading additional Microsoft programs. Should a licence key be deemed illegitimate, the user will be given another 30-day grace period to acquire a legitimate licence key, Microsoft said.

During this grace period warnings will be displayed and Vista will block access to the Windows Defender antispyware tool, ReadyBoost memory expansion feature and Aero advanced graphics option, Microsoft said. Also, a persistent text will display in the lower right hand of the screen: "This copy of Windows is not genuine."

If Vista is not validated after the 30 days, the user will again be locked out.

As part of the increased effort to make it harder to pirate its products, Microsoft is also changing the way businesses license its software. New licensing systems will replace the current volume licence keys, which have been widely abused, Hartje said. "Fifty percent of the piracy, we think, uses keys issued to volume licensing customers," she said.

Volume licence keys are registration codes for products that Microsoft gives out to large organisations in plain text. One key can be used to activate and run an unlimited number of copies of the product, for example Windows XP or Office XP.

Starting with Vista, Microsoft will offer two different types of keys and offer three different ways to distribute them within an organisation. In all cases, some more work will be required on the part of the technology department at a company.

"They will just need to do a little extra planning," Hartje said.

The first type of product key to replace the current system is called "multiple activation key," or MAK. An IT pro at a company can install a key on a machine that will then need to be validated online. Alternatively a proxy can be set up centrally to activate multiple systems at once, according to Microsoft.

The second licensing option is called "key management service", or KMS. This requires the organisation to set up a KMS service on the corporate network that will activate client machines. The Vista PCs will silently find the KMS service and activate, according to Microsoft.

It may seem as though businesses will have to count all their licences, but it's really not as bad as it sounds, said Michael Silver, an analyst with Gartner.

"It has nothing to do with licence counting right now, but companies will need to expend time and effort and some money to administer this, in the name of helping Microsoft recoup revenue lost to piracy," he said. "There needs to be more of a benefit [for customers]. Linux and Mac communities will try to make hay with this, but this will not be the tipping point."

Talkback

The next step is yearly maintenance charges, with the software deactivating if the offer is not taken up.
MS have been looking at ways to keep the revenue increasing and as soon as the have the technology sorted it means they can force upgrades or ongoing license fees at will.
Business wise I have not found justification for upgrading from w2k to XP so Vista doesn't even figure.

via Facebook 6 October, 2006 11:31
Reply

Why would anyone in their right mind be willing to be treated in such a way. Being a genuine licence holder and having to prove that I bought it makes me feel like a thief unless I can prove otherwise. Having been beta testing this product, Vista is not really ground breaking technology. One year on and I'm sure Linux will have caught up, if not overtaken this bug infested dinosaur. No wonder Bill Gates has abandoned Microsoft. I assume in a declining sales market Microsoft see it as a way to boost their dwindling profits.

via Facebook 6 October, 2006 19:44
Reply

Microsoft’s new Windows Genuine Advantage policy is just what I feared back when the original was introduced. But fears of intrusive interference with my computer were consoled by Microsoft’s claim that WGA was not going to disable my software but just notify me of problems and tell me how to fix them.

The new WGA is nothing less than corporate sponsored spyware. The potential for abuse is endless.

I certainly agree that piracy is a problem but I don’t think WGA is the right solution. Some of my worries are these:

What if I happen to install a third party application that somehow affects how my original Vista OS configuration causing it to appear altered to Microsoft’s WGA servers?

What if hackers figure out a way to make legitimate copies of Vista look fake via a virus or malware?

What if the recovery CD’s I made for my Vista equipped computer fail to load properly after a malfunction or operating system problem?
What if Microsoft’s WGA servers are damaged in a natural disaster?

What if I lose internet connectivity for a period of time, like if I go on an extended vacation? Will I need to re validate my OS?

What if I can’t afford to pay Microsoft’s support fees to reactivate my legitimate copy of Vista after it is mistakenly disabled?

What if the government orders Microsoft to disable operating systems for people suspected of collaborating with terrorists?

Ok, maybe that’s going a bit too far. But WAKE UP! This is evil not to mention stupid.

But it looks like it will be welcomed or at least tolerated with little if any protest.

Greg

via Facebook 6 October, 2006 23:25
Reply

The power of monopoly. Microsoft is like the U.S. government - the only superpower, and so it can do whatever it likes. Why the EU goes along with either party is beyond me..

Microsoft knows it cannot stop "professional pirates". This has nothing to do with "piracy" - it's all about gouging the home user, parents with children also using PCs.

Capitalism is the exploitation of the weak. Duh.

via Facebook 7 October, 2006 04:41
Reply

( "1. Important: must unzip all files into a new folder, Won't work f you run it from inside the zip file.

2. Run WindowsXP&2003Activation.cmd to activate windows.

3. If you're locked out and can't login because
activation needed, please login windows in Safe-Mode, and run the "Windows-Activation.cmd"

Thank you!" ).

Just tried it. It works with all versions of Microsoft Windows
including Vista. Ironically the "crack" is also available on eBay.
Just like the Internet the battle never ends it's what makes computing interesting.

via Facebook 9 October, 2006 01:38
Reply

"It has nothing to do with licence counting right now, but companies will need to expend time and effort and some money to administer this, in the name of helping Microsoft recoup revenue lost to piracy," he said. "There needs to be more of a benefit [for customers]. Linux and Mac communities will try to make hay with this, but this will not be the tipping point."

Ahhh so in order for microsoft to get more money the companies who use the ms software have to pay their employees to make sure that microsoft are getting their cash!

There doesn't seem to be any sort of incentive here. Why would anyone in their right mind agree to pay their IT department for learning how to set this up just to ensure that microsoft are getting all the money they can. It is rediculous. Typical microsoft, pass the buck and claim the rewards.

via Facebook 9 October, 2006 13:14
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

6 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

14 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

16 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

16 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

18 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

20 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

21 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

22 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

22 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

23 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint