Windows XP messenger takes aim at AOL

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Microsoft this week will introduce a test version of Windows XP that significantly boosts the abilities of instant messaging software to provide text, chat, video, audio and telephony services. Dubbed Windows Messenger, the product is Microsoft's effort to bundle other communication technologies with Internet instant messaging and to gain an advantage over rival AOL Time Warner. The release also coincides with negotiations between the two companies to include AOL software in Windows XP and to extend AOL's use of Microsoft's Internet Explorer Web browser. The talks, which include other issues, broke down Friday but resumed again over the weekend, indicating the sides remain far apart. Microsoft already provides some of the messaging features -- such as chat, file sharing, Internet phone calling and teleconferencing -- with its MSN Messenger service when used with NetMeeting or in association with services from Net2Phone and other companies. But Windows Messenger will be more closely tied to the operating system than the MSN messaging service. The strategy is similar to Microsoft's integration of the Internet Explorer Web browser with Windows 95. That bundling move helped Microsoft win the browser battle with Netscape and spurred the U.S. government to charge the company with violating antitrust laws. A federal judge ruled last year that Microsoft abused its monopoly in the operating system market to thwart competition in other areas. Microsoft, which argued that it broke no laws in adding new features to the OS, appealed the decision; a ruling is expected any day. Until now, Microsoft has focused its online communication efforts on instant text messaging, where the company has been engaged in a contest to win users from AOL Time Warner. There the Internet and media giant has played hardball, blocking Microsoft and other rivals from connecting their Internet messaging users to the AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) service. But by adding phone calling, videoconferencing and other features, Microsoft is looking to redefine the category, said Peter O'Kelly, an analyst with Patricia Seybold Group. But he cautioned, "People might assume this is all about competing with AOL, but there is much more to it." With Windows Messenger, Microsoft is taking many technologies it already offers and is pulling them together into one product, similar to its approach with Outlook. When Microsoft introduced Outlook about five years ago, many other companies offered e-mail programs, contact or calendar applications, but none had pulled them together. "You could have gathered the different pieces together yourself, but Microsoft wrapped everything together with Outlook," O'Kelly said. "Windows Messenger is definitely similar." Shawn Sanford, Microsoft's group product manager for Windows, agreed. "Today we have a lot of disparate communication technologies, whether that be instant messaging, telephony or video with NetMeeting," he said. "This is the unification of all of these different communication technologies into one single client." By folding advanced messaging technology into Windows, Microsoft raises a number of issues, and one of the most important is the specter of antitrust. An appeals court could rule soon on Microsoft's antitrust case. If, as is widely expected, the Court of Appeals sides with Microsoft, "they would be free to put pretty much anything they want into the operating system," said Bob Lande, an antitrust professor with University of Baltimore Law School. Another important distinction that may drive off trustbusters is Microsoft's approach to messaging. While the company will fold its newer messaging technology into the operating system, existing customers will not be forced to buy Windows XP to get an instant messenger. "MSN Messenger is an incredibly popular technology that we will continue to innovate on, and it's really focused on the text instant messaging, along with some voice," Microsoft's Sanford said. Another difference is how Microsoft will position Windows Messenger -- as a platform that other companies can use to build their own products and services. "This is a platform technology," Sanford said. "People can actually go and write services on top of this, or take the technology in Windows XP and put it in their applications." One example of where this could be used is Internet gaming, Sanford said. Internet gaming is often complicated to setup, requiring players to know each other's Internet Protocol (IP ) address and working out a fixed time to play. But Windows Messenger would notify the gamers when other players were online and simplify the connection process using .Net or other servers. Some of the biggest technological differences between MSN Messenger and Windows Messenger have to do with telephony and video. The new messaging client, for example, greatly reduces the echo associated with Internet phone calls made without headsets, analysts say. "This is Microsoft saying that each PC can be used as a voice-communication device," said Guernsey Research analyst Chris LeTocq. "If they can get phone-quality voice, if they can hit the quality barrier, you essentially have a phone replacement." But how far Microsoft will go with the telephony aspect is uncertain. The software giant earlier this year capped the length of Internet phone calls made using MSN Messenger. Another change is how the telephony or video responds to different types of connections, whether dial-up or broadband. Windows Messenger detects the speed of the connection and automatically loads the correct audio or video codecs needed to deliver the data. Videoconferencing quality is greatly improved over NetMeeting, O'Kelly said. Besides seeing the person on the other end, the caller also appears in a small window. Despite the advances, Windows Messenger does have some shortcomings, such as the inability to do videoconferencing with multiple PCs. Windows Messenger also has ties to HailStorm, another key element of Microsoft's .Net strategy. HailStorm uses Microsoft's Passport authentication service to deliver content and services to a variety of devices, including handhelds, cell phones and PCs. With HailStorm, Microsoft hopes to move away from free Internet content to a paid services model. So far, instant messaging has been an integral part of HailStorm services. American Express, which uses Passport to authenticate some credit card purchases, relies on MSN Messenger to warn customers of suspicious purchases. Antivirus maker McAfee.com will use HailStorm to deliver online protection services and to dispatch virus warnings using instant messaging. The ultimate goal of instant messaging is for Microsoft, AOL Time Warner and other companies to give users global identities that can be used for additional paid services based on screen names, said Gartner analyst Michael Silver. "In terms of their competition with AOL to supplant their instant messenger, this is a good strategy for Microsoft," Silver said. The popularity of instant messaging is undisputed, with AOL Time Warner's ICQ messenger passing the 100 million customer mark in early May. Microsoft claims 32 million MSN Messenger users. But until now, the profit potential from those users has been unclear. Turning messaging into a technology around which Microsoft and other companies can build Windows-based products or services could finally lead to big profits down the road, "particularly for .Net," O'Kelly said. "This would also be a compelling reason for buying Windows XP." To ensure Windows Messenger has mass appeal, Microsoft has made the product compliant with the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) advocated by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). SIP is a framework for establishing, maintaining and ending Internet multimedia conferences and phone calls. Windows Messenger's larger appeal may be the ease with which people will be able to communicate, particularly for telephony initially and video later on, LeTocq said. "It's all peer-to-peer," he said. "What happens on the backend is that it's a bit like Napster. So you're talking directly to the IP address of the other person." As with music-swapping service Napster, Microsoft's servers act as a conduit connecting two users directly. Companies can delivery Windows Messenger services over a corporate Intranet using Exchange server, while Microsoft will offer them through its .Net servers over the Internet. Long term, Microsoft plans to extend Windows Messenger to other devices, such as Pocket PC, as part of .Net. See also: ZDNet UK's Windows XP News Section. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the Microsoft forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

2 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

6 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

16 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

24 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material