RIPA surveillance may break human rights laws

By Matthew Broersma, ZDNet.co.uk, 31 July, 2002 16:43

NEWS

Surveillance powers giving law enforcement agencies access to consumers' mobile phone and Internet data may be illegal, according to the information commissioner, Elizabeth France. The powers, introduced by an upcoming provision of the controversial Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA), passed two years ago, may violate human rights laws because of a loophole under which law enforcement agencies may access data that has been retained specifically for use in cases involving national security. The information commissioner warned the Home Office of this conflict in a legal opinion issued this week. RIPA has long been attacked by privacy advocates and those who maintain that its provisions will prove to be a huge burden on Internet service providers (ISPs). A provision coming into force on Thursday will require ISPs to be able to intercept and store electronic communications including emails, faxes and Web surfing data, but the Home Office has not yet detailed how the companies involved will be reimbursed. ZDNet UK has also unveiled a glaring loophole in the provision that makes it much less effective in stopping organised crime. The information commissioner's legal opinion, from Ben Emmerson QC, advised that RIPA's data access provision could break the law because of conflict with anti-terrorism legislation hurriedly introduced by the Home Office following last September's terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Under this legislation, businesses are directed to voluntarily retain data for longer than they ordinarily would for billing purposes, in case the data is needed for national security investigations. The problem arises when data retained specifically for national security purposes is accessed under RIPA's broader powers, according to Emmerson. "RIPA enables a wide variety of bodies to allow access to the data for a variety of purposes, not just national security, although it was retained for national security purposes," said a representative of the information commissioner. There is a "significant risk" that any body accessing data under RIPA that is not related to national security could be breaking human rights law, according to a summary of the legal opinion. The Office initially commissioned the report because of concerns about the data retention provisions of the anti-terrorism legislation, which Emmerson did not deem problematic in itself. However, the report could create more complications for the Home Office, which has already faced a public outcry over the data access provision of RIPA. In June, the Home Office was compelled to withdraw a plan to extend RIPA's data access provisions to cover a wide range of bodies, from the National Health Service to local councils, after the move was widely condemned. The Home Office is now planning a consultation on the issue over the summer and autumn. "This will be an opportunity to look at the issue from afresh, and hopefully to tighten it up," the representative of the information commissioner said. "It will probably require a change in the primary legislation, but whether the Home Office will go that far, I don't know." A Home Office representative insisted that access to private data under RIPA "is lawful under the provisions of that Act... We are aware of the concerns that the information commissioner has, but at the moment it's laid down in law the reasons for which bodies can access data." However, the Home Office allowed that the data access provision -- the last, along with the retention capabilities provision, to come into effect -- has caused "a lot of public concern" and will have to be examined during the upcoming consultation. The consultation, for which a date has not yet been set, was intended only to examine whether the number of bodies covered by the act should be extended. However, "the purposes for which data can be accessed will also be addressed," the Home Office representative said.

Who's watching you? Get the latest on spy networks such as Echelon and Carnivore, as well as privacy issues for companies and individuals alike, at ZDNet UK's Privacy News Section. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Talkback

Dear Sir/Madam.

For some time now I have been under surveillance. My flat has bugging devices in the form of wall socket transmitters, which were installed by electrical contractors about two years ago. In addition to these, I have also miniture cameras that have been inserted into the cavity of my walls in each of my 5 rooms; kitchen, living room, 2 bedrooms and bathroom.

There has also been exstensive aircraft and helicopter surveillance used against me, every day for more that three years!

All of this seems to coincide with the systematic banging from the people below me (24 Tabard House, Manciple Street, SE1 4DL) which has been going on now for about 3 years.

I have written to practically everyone in the government including the IPT and my MP Simon Hughes. However, nothing has been done to explain to me why I am under surveillance in the first place!

The banging I have experianced now for three years is, I belive to make me leave my flat, so the intelligence services can search my premises. Exactly what the security services would be looking for, I have no idea.

All of this sleep depravation is physcological torture. This is a direct violation of my human rights as well as an intrusion into my personal privacy. These people are putting my health and safety at risk.

I want to make it clear, I have done nothing wrong. I have broken no laws nor am I a threat to national security.

I'm not wrong about this nor would I waste anyones time.

I don't know what else I can do. I have been woken every day between 2:30am to 6:30am for three years. This is not a council problem nor the noise pollution teams which I have repeatedly complained to. This is something else.

I don't know if anyone in your office can give me any advice about this matter. My MP Simon Hughes is as toothless as the government are. It seems the intelligence services have more control over our elected officials than the rest of us can possibly imagine.

Do you agree that it's about time we here in Britain should have a proper Freedom of Information Act, a House Intelligence Commitee and Congressional Hearings as they have in the US? Otherwise, we are never going to get the proper democratic accountabillity we should of had in this country a long time ago!

Yours Sincerely,

Tony Skortou

via Facebook 21 June, 2006 12:09

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

ZDNet UK Live

> I'm told it's somewhat annoying when people have their Macs stolen > and Apple stores treat the thief as the owner, but there you go. Ouch,...

25 minutes ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks

@kevinmchapman. OK, I acknowledge that 'most' was a gratuitous throwaway comment as an afterthought and too presumptuous. As to proof, as you...

5 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

@BrownieBoy > Works really well for thieves.... >> Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally >> irrelevant, even...

6 hours ago by Jack Schofield on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks

fantastic that the so called piracy bills have been withdrawn. however, these anti-democracy supporters are still in the shadows so lets be alert...

7 hours ago by raskolnikof on SOPA, Protect IP support wavers in face of online protest

Please God no; teach them anything you like - thinking rationally, the uses and misuses of data, what data is and what it's not - but leave the...

9 hours ago by Tony Douglas via Facebook on Kids are the future. Teach ’em to code.

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

23 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

1 day ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

1 day ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

2 days ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint