Robotic cars to race from LA to Vegas

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
By day, Seth Cabe is a manufacturing engineer for a mannequin maker. By night, he's working on what could become the battlefield vehicle of the future.

Cabe, leader of Team Loghiq, is one of a number of engineers, researchers and robot aficionados who have signed up for the Darpa Grand Challenge, a contest designed to generate ideas that ideally will lead to the development of self-driving combat vehicles.

Put simply, the Defence Advanced Research Project Agency (Darpa) will give $1m (£620,000) to the team whose robotic car drives itself the fastest from Los Angeles to Las Vegas, on an off-road course. The race, which must be won within 10 hours, will take place on March 13 next year.

The hard part is that the 250-mile course -- which won't be revealed until two hours before the start -- will require the computerised vehicles to drive through or around sand, mud, boulders, ditches, barbed wire, mountains and at least one overpass where onboard global positioning systems (GPS) for navigation won't work. (Except to send commands for an emergency stop and restart, the teams can't interfere with the driving.)

So though the vehicles are expected to travel at an average of 25 miles per hour, and to hit 50mph or more at times, they have to be capable of swerving or stopping suddenly.

"The major challenge, other than fundraising, is real-time obstacle detection and avoidance. It simply doesn't exist right now as an off-the-shelf item," said Team Loghiq's Cabe.

Like other contestants, Cabe harbours doubts that any machine can meet Darpa's challenge. However, he's taking part anyway. "I'm an engineer. I can't stay away from projects like this," he said.

The competition grew out of a US Defense Department mandate to increase the use of technology in the field. The agency wants one-third of all combat vehicles to be able to operate unmanned by 2015, according to Don Shipley, a spokesman for the Darpa Grand Challenge.

Autonomous flying vehicles, such as the drones used in the Gulf War and in combat in Yemen, are already being used by the US military.

Congress authorised the contest format a few years ago. "The idea is to attract fresh thinking on the subject, to get beyond the Lockheeds and the Grummans," Shipley said, referring to military contractors Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman.

Darpa will hold future contests involving different types of vehicles and technological challenges, he added.

Although the government agency came up with initial rules, it changed these after getting feedback from the 34 registered participants. Earlier, the rules stated that the vehicles couldn't be human-controlled machines. One participant asked if that meant it would be OK to get a chimp to drive. Now, the rules state no living thing can control a contestant vehicle.

Some vehicles are being designed specially for the race. Others are retrofits of existing vehicles. For example, theArctic Tortoise, sponsored by the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska, is a 1992 Jeep Cherokee with sensors, beefy shock absorbers and a bevy of computers.

Mr. Magoo calling
Perhaps the chief underlying technical challenge lies in avoiding desert debris, according to contestants.

Commercially available GPS navigation systems -- typically used to control tractors or to guide surveying equipment -- are accurate to within a metre. That means race vehicles that get knocked off track should be able to easily and rapidly find their course again.

GPS systems, however, can't pick out rocks or ditches -- which can ground a car -- and sometimes fail to work in dust storms. To get around this, contestants are loading up their cars with sensors, cameras and accelerometers. These feed data about objects in the car's field of vision (and the car's position relative to those items) to onboard computers for supplemental navigation.

Some contestants will also rig their vehicles with radar and sonar to pinpoint location.

"If all of the sensors agree, we'll go full power," said Ivar Schoenmeyr, captain of the CyberRider team, whose day job is chief scientist at a pump company in Southern California. "But if all of the sensors for some reason are disagreeing, we'll go with the most reliable system (and) slow way, way down."

Calculations and decisions have to be made rapidly, however, and the room for error is huge. A vehicle moving at 45 miles per hour is covering about 60 feet per second.

"You only have about four seconds to stop or slow down," said Richard Ruhkick, an engineering technician at the University of Alaska at Fairbanks, who leads the Arctic Tortoise team. If the vehicle's computer can't absorb changes in data quickly enough, it could mean a trip into a gully.

Most teams are still in the preliminary planning and testing stages. The Arctic Tortoise team members, for instance, recently completed tests where they bashed about with the Cherokee on the University of Alaska's Poker Flat Rocket Research Range (the only university-owned rocket range, according to Ruhkick). Now, they are stripping the Jeep's interior to install computers.

The vehicles entered in the Grand Challenge vary greatly, as do the design philosophies and budgets behind them. One of the acknowledged favourites is Sandstorm, out of Carnegie Mellon University. William "Red" Whittaker, the Fredkin Professor of Robotics there, is overseeing the project. (Whittaker devised robots that helped clean up after the accident at Philadelphia's Three Mile Island power plant.)

Another team, from CalTech, has several students and a full-time project manager working on its vehicle, along with professors. Its corporate sponsors include IBM and Northrop Grumman.

Some contestants have estimated that the budgets for the Caltech and CMU projects could run as high as $5m or $6m. Most other competitors will get by on a budget closer to $100,000, backed up with donations and lots of free labour.

Still, budget isn't a barrier to creativity. For example, Team Loghiq is building an invertible vehicle that can operate even if it flips upside down. The vehicle, still under construction, will consist of a relatively flat platform that is mounted on custom-made, five-foot-diameter wheels. It will largely be crafted out of carbon fibre, titanium and Kevlar.

"We should have the lightest vehicle there," said Cabe, who also races solar-powered, human-controlled vehicles.

< p> The Loghiq vehicle is also expected to feature "tank" steering, which means its wheels are able to alternately lock and spin. Most other contestants are using robot-controlled steering wheels and movable front wheels.

Taiwan's Via Technologies is donating mini-ITX motherboards and microprocessors that will serve as onboard computers to the Loghiq team.

Start your engines
The next big milestone will come on 14 October, when the participants must submit technical papers detailing their work to Darpa. A panel will then determine whether the plans conform to the contest rules and are technically feasible. It will also dispense advice, said Shipley. Many of the 34 registered contestants are likely to drop out by this stage.

Most teams are then hoping to have vehicles in operation by the beginning of 2004. All will then begin to gather in Southern California in March for a Darpa symposium and a technical inspection. Two hours before the race, the route will be given to teams for downloading onto the vehicles' onboard computers, which will then create digital maps.

And, while participants said the million-dollar prize money would be nice, it's generally not the motivating factor.

"What drew me to the contest? The prospect to expand my horizons and do something that had never been done before," said Schoenmeyr. "Mount Everest has been climbed, the North Pole discovered..."

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

2 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

5 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

7 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

12 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

21 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint