Netscape secure socket not secure

NEWS
Like a security guard asleep at the front desk, Netscape's certificate management is leaving some doors unsecured. On May 12, 2000, CERT, an Internet security organisation, reported on a security deficiency regarding the way Netscape's browser validates SSL (Secure Socket Layer) certificates. This security hole has the potential of exposing e-commerce customers' sensitive data to a malicious Web site operator. With the help of testing from KeyLabs, BugNet was able to validate the security hole as well as Netscape's recently released security update for that hole. The problem is not that Netscape doesn't check for SSL certificates. The problem is in the way it validates those certificates. By not validating certificates appropriately, Netscape Communicator fails to warn the user of an invalid certificate, thereby allowing a malicious Web site operator to usurp a legitimate Web site identity and acquire sensitive customer information, like credit card numbers and passwords. SSL is implemented to assure Web users that they are really communicating with the intended Web server. It involves encrypted communication between the browser and the Web server. When functioning properly, SSL provides the vehicle for browsers to validate the credentials of a Web site. For example, when connecting to a secure site, the browser first establishes an SSL session with the Web server. The server then presents its certificate, typically issued by a certificate provider. The browser checks to see if the certificate is valid. Some of the things it looks for include: 1) the certificate must be issued by a trusted authority, like Verisign or Thawte. 2) the certificate must not have expired. And 3) the certificate must be issued for the site that you are trying to connect to. In other words, if you are browsing to www.securecompany.com and the certificate must be for www.securecompany.com. If any of these three criteria are not met, then Netscape would generate an invalid certificate warning message. Netscape correctly identifies these three conditions when it first establishes a secure connection. The problem is that while the secure session is alive, all secure connections to that server's IP address are assumed to be part of the same session. By not comparing host names with certificates for each connection, Netscape allows a malicious Web programmer redirect secure requests from the legitimate site to the renegade site where the hacker can glean the users information. In order for this Netscape SSL vulnerability to be exploited, certain conditions need to be met. First of all, the hacker must be able to contaminate your DNS server. Without this ability, it would be impossible to redirect your request from the legitimate Web site to the malicious one. Second, the malicious site must itself have a valid SSL certificate. Third, before the unwary user connects with the legitimate Web site, that user must make a valid, secure connection to the malicious site. You can check site certificates manually by double-clicking on the lock icon at the bottom of the Netscape browser and comparing the certificate name with the site you are trying to visit. While the potential for abuse is here, the likelihood is small due to the complexity of the prerequisites. The people most able to exploit this vulnerability would be your ISP or someone with control over Domain Name Service (DNS) tables. Also, they would need a way to "dupe" you into establishing a secure connection with their bogus site. KeyLabs was able to reproduce this vulnerability and the subsequent patch issued by Netscape. We used two Web sites with digital certificates issued by RSA. Instead of contaminating a DNS server entry we modified the host's file on the browsing computer to point to the bogus Web site. With this configuration we were able to redirect the user's secure connection from the intended site to our malicious site. The quickest way around this security hole is to update your Netscape Communicator with the Netscape Personal Security Manager (PSM) Add-on. You might also choose this time to upgrade to the latest release of Netscape version 4.73, which includes the fix for this vulnerability. Something else you might consider is keeping an eye on your ISP and DNS server. Big ISPs have a big name to protect and will be more diligent in ensuring that their DNS servers do not get compromised. What do you think? Tell the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 hour ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

4 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

4 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

5 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

6 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

7 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

7 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

7 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

8 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

8 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

8 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

8 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

9 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

12 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

13 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

13 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

14 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

15 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

16 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility