The Day Ahead: WebMD prognosis is wait-and-see

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Acquiring companies is always the easy part. The hard stuff comes when you have to integrate the acquisitions and actually produce the much-ballyhooed synergies. Ask online health-care company WebMD, the Atlanta-based company formerly known as Healtheon/WebMD and before that as just Healtheon. The merger-happy WebMD, renamed for branding effect, completed its biggest feat on Tuesday. WebMD got final shareholder approval for the acquisitions of Medical Manager and its CareInSite subsidiary as well as a stray deal with OnHealth Network. The merger terms were rejiggered after dot-coms, including Healtheon, tanked. Meanwhile, investors grew weary of WebMD's never-a-dull-merger approach. WebMD has made eight acquisitions since November. And these weren't small purchases. For almost a year, investors saw the same rerun. It went something like this: WebMD issues a lot of stock to buy a company, holds a conference call to tout the possibilities and later reports a lot of red ink. WebMD currently trades near its 52-week low. Those merger days are over for WebMD -- there aren't many online health companies left to buy. Now the WebMD story is all about cost cutting, improving operations, boosting margins and delivering profits. And investors are in wait-and-see mode. For the record, the WebMD strategy is still the same. WebMD's mission is make the health care system more efficient. The company brings home the bucks by conducting electronic health transactions and selling advertising, software and subscriptions. Indeed, analysts said WebMD has acquired quite a collection of assets. "They have put a lot of strategic assets in place," said Conan Laughlin, an analyst at Deutsche Banc Alex Brown. "From a high level it makes strategic sense, but there are major operational challenges." Laughlin's assessment is the common mantra on Wall Street when it comes to WebMD. "In theory this sounds great," said Kevin Berg, an analyst with FAC/Equities. But? WebMD has to make its work together in an industry that's notoriously slow to adopt new technology. The company has to make Medical Manager's software Internet savvy. It also needs to link its transaction platforms together and plug it all into the WebMD site. If it all works -- and that's a big if -- patients can communicate with their doctors more efficiently. Simply put, there's a lot of work to do before WebMD reaches online health-care nirvana. Here are a few mileposts to watch to determine if WebMD is worth a gamble: The plan: WebMD will report its third quarter earnings in late October or early November with analysts expecting a loss of 22 cents a share, excluding some hefty acquisition charges. Losing money is nothing new to WebMD, but investors will be anxiously awaiting the company's integration plans. Job cuts are nearly certain and the management will detail what businesses are expendable. Revenue and earnings projections for the merged entity also wouldn't hurt. The products: Cydney Kislin, an analyst at Tucker Anthony, said WebMD is likely to have updated software by the end of the year. The new platform will integrate the WebMD portal with the desktop management software and transaction system. The big issue is how long will it take to put together an integrated Internet-based structure. The management: There'll be a few management changes on the horizon. WebMD has way too many chefs in its kitchen. When the terms of the Medical Manager takeover were renegotiated, Medical Manager received equal management and board representation. Now the executive suite is crowded to say the least. The good news is that WebMD has a deep management team. The bad news is somebody will take a hike. Analysts agree that the guy running the WebMD show is co-CEO Martin J. Wygod, formerly Chairman of Medical Manager and CareInsite. Wygod, 60, has tons of health-care experience and is respected on Wall Street. Many WebMD fans cited the "Marty factor" as the primary reason for being bullish on the stock. If Wygod is so great why is he sharing CEO roles with 30-year-old Jeffrey T. Arnold, the former CEO of Healtheon? That's a technicality based on who had the bigger stock price when the companies merged. Analysts expect Wygod to rule the roost in the near future. "If anyone can make this work, Marty can," said Berg. The payoff: So when will WebMD shares move? Analysts said it'll be six to nine months before investors see any discernable synergies. WebMD can't be a momentum stock with out some serious revenue growth. "A lot of investors are in wait-and-see mode," said Berg. "There are a lot of moving parts." What do you think? Tell the Mailroom. And read what others have said. See ZDII for US tech investor news. See techTrader for more technology investment news, plus quotes and research.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

22 minutes ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

3 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

6 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

11 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

20 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint