Nasdaq: Have we hit rock bottom yet?

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
NEWS ANALYSIS -- Investors were forced to ask themselves whether the worst is yet to come as they as they continued their relentless dumping of technology stocks Monday afternoon, dragging the Nasdaq composite below the 2,000-point threshold for the first time since December 1998. It didn't help that Cisco Systems, long considered the crown jewel of the technology sector, announced Friday it would layoff up to 8,000 employees and predicted the economic slowdown will haunt sales and earnings into 2002. Before Cisco, it was Oracle. And before it Oracle it was Intel, which came after the entire PC sector warned of pathetic sales and earnings growth in 2001. The magnitude of this Nasdaq collapse is a staggering considering the index ploughed through the 5,000-point landmark this time last year. Those were the days of multibillion-dollar mergers and dozens of daily initial public offerings not only from shaky dot-com operations but also from upstart networking and software companies, which, if you believed the investment firms taking them public, had limitless potential. All the paper wealth accumulated in the Nasdaq between December 1998 and this week -- roughly $3.6tn (about £2.3tn) in real money according to analysts -- has evaporated in a scant 12 months. "A year ago all the mistakes that were made by analysts and investors were on the positive side," said Tad LaFountain, an analyst at Needham & Co. "Now the mistakes being made are on the negative side. What's interesting is if you look at the revenue and sales estimates for these tech stocks, it looks like people confused 2000 with 2001." Throughout fiscal 2000, technology firms of all stripes and colours were posting staggering sales and earnings growth from what was already an incredibly high level established in 1999. Orders for the latest flash memory chips, network-equipment and wireless telecommunications gizmos far outstripped demand. With technology stocks already trading at sky-high valuations and technology products saturating the market, analysts had little choice but to continue to raise estimates and maintain positive outlooks on these stocks. "You also had an entire population of mutual-fund managers driven to improve their performance without the hindrance of experiencing a downturn," LaFountain said. Clearly investors and the companies they invested in didn't know how good they had it back in that wildly optimistic period when the Internet was coming of age and venture capitalists were compelled to back anything that might have even the slightest chance of becoming the next Yahoo! or Amazon.com. What a difference a year makes Back in March 2000 when the Nasdaq first eclipsed the 5,000 mark, Yahoo shares were trading $183.25 fresh off a 2-for-1 stock split. CMGI, which built its name mostly on the backs of money-losing dot-coms, was perched at $144.63. Those stocks now trade at $17.25 and $3.25 a share, respectively. But this capitulation isn't confined to the dot-com universe. Cisco shares, which traded at $139.63, are now going for $19 a share. Intel, now at $28.25, had moved up to $118.38, and Microsoft, currently going for $52.94, was considered "cheap" at $100 a share. Lucent Technologies, now hovering around $12 a share, was trading at $68.88. Inflation remained in check while productivity skyrocketed as all this new technology found its way into offices and factories around the world. With amateur investors opening up online brokerage accounts in record numbers and 401(k) contributions at a fevered pitch, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan did his best to curb this "irrational exuberance" by steadily increasing short-term interest rates six times in an 18-month period. The market shrugged off these increases, making it impossible for the Fed or individual investors to accurately gauge the impact of such a severe shift in the nation's monetary policy. Once the predictable inventory glut hit the technology sector, these rate hikes began to impact the economy at a time that it could least afford it. Greenspan & Co. did their best to rectify the situation in the first five weeks of the year by cutting rates by a full point. Most analysts are convinced that at least another quarter-point reduction looms for later this month. Meanwhile consumer confidence began to crumble as many of the companies that were placing orders in 1999 and 2000 either went bankrupt or cancelled orders altogether. Nasdaq declines fan out Now that the Nasdaq has lost more than 60 percent of its value in the past year, its woes are starting to spread to more conservative investments. "Some say we've finally hit a bottom, but I'm not in that camp," said Joseph Barthel, chief investment strategist at Fahnestock & Co. "In fact, we're starting to see this weakness spill over into the S&P 500. That really opens up the possibility for a greater decline ahead." The S&P 500 fell below 1,200 points Monday, down 23 percent from its peak of 1,553 set last March. Barthel said that while the monetary policy has improved and stocks have been terribly oversold in recent months, the market still lacks an improved investor sentiment that is necessary before any significant recovery can begin. Analysts universally agree it's all but impossible to call the absolute bottom during a correction of this magnitude. But when investors do regain confidence in the economy and these technology companies, the game begins anew. "When this temporary mismatch between demand and supply growth is corrected, the recovery will be instantaneous and ferocious," LaFountain said. "There will be no lag from companies waiting to lay new fibre or build new manufacturing plants. Everything will be in place for a major rally." Until then, investors will have plenty of time to get used to this new economy that happens to look a lot like the one they saw in late 1998. See techTrader for the latest technology investment news, plus quotes and research. Stocks may be down, but don't count them out just yet. Steven Vaughan-Nichols reckons that if the idiots insisting on treating all technology stocks like they have foot-and-mouth disease got over it -- the rest of the economy could start to recover. Go to AnchorDesk UK for the news comment. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the techTrader forum Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

6 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

14 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

15 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

16 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

18 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

19 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

20 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

21 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

21 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

22 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

24 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint