Microsoft's XP: Hardware changes a turnoff

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Microsoft may have discovered the ultimate turnoff. The company's new product-activation technology, which locks Office XP or Windows XP to a particular PC hardware configuration, can deactivate unexpectedly, rendering the software useless. The feature could present the biggest headache to people that frequently upgrade or change components on their PCs. Already, the activation technology, introduced to thwart piracy and promote software subscriptions, is controversial with some users of the new Office software package. "I have been completely against Windows Product Activation from the second Microsoft announced they would implement it in Windows XP and Office XP," said Bryan Jagielski, an Office user and software engineer from Dallas. "Microsoft has every right to combat piracy, but they should do so without invading my privacy." Microsoft introduced product-activation technology with an update to Office 2000 but made it standard fare with Office XP, released in late May. It will also be standard with Windows XP, the new version of the operating system set to launch 25 October. In the case of Office XP, people can open the software programs 50 times before activating the product by phone or over the Internet. The process "locks" the software to the user's specific PC configuration. In testing versions of Windows XP, the product must be activated within 14 days. Failing to do so renders the software useless. The deactivation feature works similarly in countries such as Australia and New Zealand, where Microsoft offers Office XP for sale on an annual subscription basis. The activation technology turns off the software unless the subscriber pays for another year's use. But the software also is capable of deactivating if the user makes radical changes to a computer's hardware configuration, which could trick the software into thinking it has been moved to another system. "When you activate, what it does is lock the software to the hardware -- takes the signature of the hardware," explained Guernsey Research analyst Chris LeTocq. "The technology is designed to detect changes in the configuration. Should the hardware fingerprint change, the activation technology may think you're running the software on another machine." The potential for problems is greatest on desktops whenever consumers or businesses upgrade components, but it can also affect notebooks, where software could be rendered virtually useless on the road if the owner made substantial hardware changes. Tom Bailey, Microsoft's lead product for Office, acknowledged this scenario can happen. "In order for the activation to take, it identifies a wide variety of components in your system," he explained. "If a certain number of components change over time -- for example, you get a new video card, add memory, this, that or the other thing to that PC -- it will ask you to reactivate." But Bailey emphasised, "The number of things required to have to go through that process we think is very small -- certainly a small subset of your readers." Once the software detects a hardware discrepancy it can't reconcile, the consumer or business must reactivate the software using the original installation CD. This requires calling Microsoft to get a one-time, 44-key code reactivating the software. In the case of Office XP, the software enters a reduced functionality mode where people cannot create or save files until reactivation. Gartner analyst Michael Silver faulted the reactivation procedure for being too sudden. Unlike initial activation, where the user has a fair number of warnings before beginning the process, the reactivation procedure can come suddenly. For someone on the road with a notebook, software could be rendered useless until that person returns to the office. "It shouldn't just deactivate and slip away," Silver said. "It should deactivate the way it activates, with a certain number of changes. It's like driving in your car and a fuel gauge light that goes on after you're empty." Microsoft's activation technology in many ways is largely misunderstood. While people must activate Office XP and Windows XP, contrary to popular belief, Microsoft does not force them to disclose personal information. Product registration is not compulsory with activation. But problems with RealNetworks' RealPlayer and other software products collecting personal information, coupled with Microsoft's strong-arm tactics revealed during its antitrust trial, have made some people wary of providing information to software makers. "Would my computers contact Microsoft and alert them to the fact that I was doing something that was perfectly legal in the previous version?" asked Brian Norton, an Office user from Arlington, Virginia. "Would they try to do anything about it? This concerns me greatly. "My concern with this type of activation technology is that what I do with software that I purchase from Microsoft is none of their business," Norton said. "Microsoft has a grand vision of software as a service. To achieve this, consumer confidence in authentication services has to come around. Right now, it has not, and with good reason." In the case of Office XP, people can install the software on two computers, such as a desktop PC and a laptop. But the second installation requires a phone call to obtain the 44-key unlock code. The process is similar to that used in other countries where Office XP is offered, optionally, on a subscription basis. Microsoft earlier this year put on hold its Office XP subscription program for the United States. But Dallas Office user Jagielski is concerned that Microsoft could use the activation technology to police subscriptions. The company is increasingly pushing subscription plans as part of the Microsoft.Net software-as-a-service strategy and other initiatives. "If Microsoft moves Windows XP to a subscription-based platform for consumers, this, combined with [product activation], can give Microsoft the capability of remotely shutting down your computer as easy as the electric company can shut off your electricity," Jagielski said. "If you don't pay your bill, you can't use your computer." Filon Agathagelidis, a medical student from Thessaloniki, Greece, believes Microsoft has legitimate reason for using activation technology. "The way I see this is that Microsoft is trying to establish a balance between piracy and legitimately purchased copies of Microsoft software," he said. "It's common sense that piracy is something that they don't want because they simply lose money." Paul Kunino Lynch, an Office user and journalist from Sydney, Australia, said he has lived with the activation technology since Office 2000, even transferring the program to a new machine without serious reactivation hardship. But he believes the technology and other issues will create problems for Microsoft as the Windows XP launch approaches. "I am entirely confident that in the months up to XP's release and for some time thereafter, we will see a great campaign of gossip and lies about harm users will suffer from the new product," he said. Take me to ZDNet Enterprise Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet News forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

Talkback

I have bought 2 copies of xp upgrades and gave them away to people who did not mind calling Microsoft for permission to do anything to their computers .
I refuse to use XP , I even will be returning the new Norton antivirus 2004 to the store because of product activation . I own 3 computers and I am not about to buy 3 of the same program .
My computer is upgraded atleast once a year and I copy the entire C drive to another hard drive for a backup . If I was to use XP or Norton , I would have to spend days on the phone to get their crappy programs activated , not to mention , Symantec doesn't even have a free phone number to call , you are charged to call them by the minute or per incident and we all know how that goes , by the time someone answers your call (if you even get a live person ), you might as well run to the store and buy another program faster .I don't believe it's a piracy problem that they worry about , it's called being GREEDY and trying to sell as much as they can .The prices aren't dropping any time soon , they are still outragously priced for the every day person and the software companies know that there aren't too may housholds with only one computer anymore .

via Facebook 24 February, 2004 20:28
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

3 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

5 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

10 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

19 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint