Microsoft, US dispute nuclear software threat

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Earlier this month, Bruce Blair, president of the Center for Defense Information, a non-profit-making military research organisation based in Washington, DC, wrote that Russian nuclear scientists last year found a bug in Microsoft's SQL Server database software that threatened the security not only of Russian nuclear weapons materials, but also of American nuclear materials. Microsoft executives and Energy Department representatives scoffed at the charge, saying Blair is making too much of a trivial matter. They said that the two bugs were never a threat, that no data was ever lost and that the issues Russia had with the software have been resolved. US nuclear data was never at risk, they said. "Bugs exist, and they get fixed," said Nancy Ambrosiano, a spokeswoman for the Los Alamos National Laboratory. At issue was software that the laboratory gave Russian researchers to help them protect their country's nuclear materials. Blair, in a column published in The Washington Post, said the Russians found a bug that caused some files to become invisible, though they remained in the database. The fear was that insiders could trace the invisible files and divert nuclear materials for dangerous ends, Blair wrote. Russian scientists alerted Los Alamos lab to the problem for fear that American nuclear materials were at risk, he wrote. The problem was found in SQL Server version 6.5. Russian scientists subsequently upgraded to SQL Server 7.0, a newer release of the database software, to help solve the problem. The scientists discovered that the same bug existed in the newer version, although in a less serious form, along with a new security flaw that could give unauthorised people easy access to information stored in the database, Blair told CNET News.com in an interview on Friday. "There was a dropped item for every 1,000 transactions" in SQL Server version 6.5, said Blair, who has uploaded email messages from Russian scientists on his organisation's Web site detailing the problems. "With (version) 7.0, (the problem) was reduced in order of magnitude, but it was still a serious problem with dropped files." Not so, say Microsoft executives and Los Alamos representatives. They say the bug that caused data to become invisible did exist, but was limited to one Russian facility that customised accounting software the lab had donated. The bug surfaced only in the customised accounting software running on SQL Server and did not appear at other customer sites, said Steve Murchie, Microsoft's group product manager for SQL Server. Microsoft offered to create a bug fix last year, but the Russian scientists didn't want it, said Murchie. "We heard this customer application was running some complex (software) code against 6.5 and was returning different results under different circumstances," he said. "We looked at it and offered to create a fix. No data was ever lost." To solve the problem, the lab suggested that the Russian scientists upgrade to SQL Server 7.0, according to Los Alamos' Ambrosiano. The Russian scientists moved to 7.0 and found a new bug that they said could allow unauthorised users to gain access to information. Murchie said the bug was a minor problem in Microsoft's instructions for using the software and has been resolved. "It was not a product flaw. Only under circumstances (where) the site (had) no password could anybody get to it," said Murchie. "If normal policies were in place, there's no impact." Murchie also takes issue with Blair's assertion that someone could have diverted the nuclear information while it was "invisible." Regardless of the software or the system, a knowledgeable insider could attempt to steal or alter information, but the blame would belong to a breakdown in the management of computing systems, not the software, Microsoft contends. "The fact of the matter is any insider with access to an application can corrupt software and divert anything for their own nefarious purpose," he said. Lab officials said Russian's customised software was never used in the United States and that the US was never vulnerable to the same problem. "To our knowledge, there has been no Russian nuclear information lost or any diversion of Russian nuclear material due to the flaw," lab representatives said in a statement. "US nuclear material accountability systems are rigorously tested and have demonstrated capability for tracking all accountable nuclear materials." Microsoft, which competes against Oracle and IBM in the database software market, sells a new version of its database called SQL Server 2000. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet news forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

3 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

5 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

5 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

7 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

7 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

8 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

9 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

9 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

9 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

10 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

10 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

10 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

10 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

13 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

14 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

15 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

16 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

17 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

18 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility