Dow off sharply as trading resumes

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
US stock markets fell sharply on Monday after New York police officers and firefighters rang the opening bell, a sound that hasn't been heard since last Tuesday's terrorist attacks. Britain's leading stocks were expected to open lower on Tuesday after the drop in the US markets, although a cut in European interest rates late on Monday was expected to limit losses. Financial bookmakers predicted the FTSE 100 would open 50 to 60 points down at about 4,850, clipping back some of Monday's 143-point rally. The Dow extended its fall after the London close. At the closing bell, the Dow Jones industrial average and Nasdaq were down about 7 percent, which analysts noted was normal considering historical reactions to catastrophe and given that international markets have fallen anywhere from 5 percent to 10 percent since the attack. The Dow dropped 684.81, or 7.1 percent, to 8,920.70. While the decline is the largest point drop ever for the index, in percentage terms the worst day was 19 October, 1987, when it plunged 22 percent. The tech-heavy Nasdaq index slumped 115.75, or 6.8 percent, to 1,579.55. The Nasdaq last traded below 1,600 in October 1998. The stock markets had their longest closure since World War I, when the New York Stock Exchange was shut down from July through mid-December of 1914. The markets closed after Tuesday's terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, which demolished New York's financial district, and on the Pentagon in Washington, DC. Over the weekend, the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq said their systems passed their tests, and New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani said mass transit into the financial district was ready to go. Despite an initial decline, many market watchers had expected the markets to stabilise. In a flurry of research notes, analysts told clients to buy if the Dow fell more than 10 percent. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission relaxed rules on corporate stock buybacks, and the Federal Reserve pumped money into the economy to ensure market liquidity. Lehman Brothers strategist Jeffrey Applegate said the terrorist attacks would surely push the US economy into a recession and hurt the corporate profit picture, but he added that "the vicious nature of the attack has prompted a vigorous monetary and fiscal policy response" that could save the economy. John Powers, managing director, Robertson Stephens Indeed, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 50 basis points Monday morning and vowed to continue to lower rates to boost spending. Most analysts expected the Fed to cut rates again soon. "With the economy in recession and an escalating political and military campaign barely begun, the central bank will now ease aggressively," Applegate said. "The central bank will be especially alert to take action to underpin consumer confidence, which was already fragile." The opening of the market on Monday was an important psychological hurdle for the United States as investors, traders and the luminaries at the NYSE looked for a sign that the economy won't be derailed by terrorism. Simply put, buying stocks is now a way to be patriotic. Many tech companies announced stock buybacks Monday. Cisco Systems, BEA Systems, Vignette, 3Com, E*Trade, Solectron and Intel joined a host of companies outside the tech sector in announcing or expanding buybacks. "We have tremendous confidence in the financial systems of our country, in our industry, and in our market-leading position both today and into the future," said John Chambers, chief executive of Cisco. Those buybacks were possible because the SEC stepped in with special measures to make buying stocks easier. Public companies are now allowed to repurchase their own securities without meeting the usual strict volume and timing restrictions. Companies are normally not allowed to buy their own stock in the first and last 30 minutes of trading. Public companies can also now repurchase their shares without adverse accounting consequences. The SEC also changed some accounting regulations. This is the first time the SEC has used its emergency powers to ease regulations. Although corporate buybacks are likely to have a big impact on the market, individual investors also want to chip in. In email chains across the country, investors urged each other to buy shares of US companies. "A way we could all participate in making sure the terrorists' objectives are not met would be to do what we can to minimise the economic impact of what has happened," said John Grover, an individual investor. "One way would be for each of us to place a buy order for $1,000 (£700) on the stock market on Monday. No sell orders." Short selling, the practice of profiting by betting a stock will fall, was also frowned upon Monday. Although market officials didn't restrict short selling, the peer pressure against shorting was immense. "To profit from this tragic event would only reward terror, and terror cannot be rewarded," Anthony Elgindy, of Pacific Equity, said in a research note. "Do not engage in short selling of the airlines involved. Do not short REITs (real estate investment trusts) involved in New York real estate, and do not short the US dollar." Although the efforts to stabilise the markets were commendable, many analysts noted that the stock markets could grow weaker once trading returns to normal. After all, the economic picture remains weak, and corporate profits are going to get worse, especially for companies tied to the insurance and airline industries. In addition, tech companies are also likely to stumble since spending has come to a halt in the pivotal weeks before the end of the third quarter. "Recent events could cause IT (information technology) spending push-outs over the next two to three months," said Scott Preston, an analyst at Research Capital. Other analysts agreed. "Earnings expectations for the balance of this year and next are likely too high," said BMO Nesbitt Burns analyst Mike Miller. The big picture painted by analysts over the past few days is that the economy is going to face a tug of war. Consumer confidence, which was the one pillar of the economy, is likely to slip as people decide to spend less on air travel, vacations and goods. Before the World Trade Center tragedy, consumers were already beginning to worry about an increasing number of layoffs. That spending slump, however, may be offset by an increase in capital spending as financial services firms rebuild their telecommunications and tech infrastructure. The government is also likely to boost spending on defence and efforts to thwart terrorism. Tech stocks fell along with the broader markets. Shares of online travel firms sank along with the airlines, as investors feared sharp cutbacks in travel. Priceline lost $1.99 at $3.01, or 39 percent, Travelocity fell $9.46 to $12.56, and Expedia was off $12.25 to $24, or 33 percent. Not everyone was suffering, however. Nokia, the world's largest maker of cell phones, gained $1.69 at $15.44 after the company reaffirmed previously issued third-quarter earnings guidance. But it did say that revenue in the third quarter would be lower than previously expected, down about 5 percent from the year-ago quarter. Intel slipped $2.48 to $23.59, and Cisco fell 47 cents at $14. The CNET Tech indexes also suffered heavy losses, with only networking, storage, wireless and telecom equipment holding up relative to other areas. Those slices of the tech sector are expected to benefit from increased government and corporate infrastructure spending. Despite the short-term turbulence, analysts across the board urged investors to take a long-term view. Those who sold stocks based on a specific event such as a war usually paid a steep price down the line. Historical evidence has shown it doesn't pay to sell after a catastrophic event. After the Cuban missile crisis the Dow took a brief dip, falling from 615 to 550 in October, but it then swung higher, reaching 650 by December. The other most recent disaster with a big market impact was the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in November 1963. The Dow plunged 20 points just after the event, but when the markets reopened it bounded up from 712 in November to 825 by April 1964. "Without a long-term investment strategy, these horrific acts and the prospects of recession in the economy may lead investors to be swayed into making imprudent and costly mistakes," BMO's Miller said. The following tech companies announced share buybacks after regulators eased rules in an effort to stabilise the stock market. 3Com
Akamai Technologies
Altera
BEA Systems
Cisco Systems
E*Trade
Intel
Sanmina
Siebel Systems
Solectron
Vignette
See techTrader for the latest financial news in the high-tech sector. See the Business News Section for full coverage. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the techTrader forum Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

6 minutes ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

3 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

6 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

10 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

20 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint