Will MS pact changes open floodgates?

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
The US Justice Department and Microsoft are expected to file separate legal briefs on Wednesday that will reveal modifications to their landmark antitrust settlement. Sources familiar with the filings said they don't expect the changes -- made in response to public comments about whether the deal would be in the public interest -- to be "dramatic". Still, any modification would represent a turnabout in positioning as the two sides struggle against a tide of comments opposing the proposed deal. The period of public comment closed one month ago, with the Justice Department saying that comments opposing the deal outnumbered those in favor by a 2-to-1 margin. "Remember, Microsoft's public posture is that they've already agreed to a far-reaching settlement," said Rich Gray, a Silicon Valley-based attorney closely following the antitrust trial. "Microsoft's approach to this all along has been to stake out a position and then be unyielding." Therefore any concession is significant, Gray said, because it signals a change in strategy. The Justice Department, nine of 18 states and Microsoft settled the case in early November. Nine other states and the District of Columbia rejected the deal, choosing to continue with litigation. For now, the case is moving forward on two separate tracks: on the one hand, the approval process for the settlement according to the Tunney Act, on the other, proceedings to determine a remedy in ongoing litigation. Andy Gavil, an antitrust professor with the Howard University School of Law, said the Justice Department and Microsoft have little choice but to change the settlement following a query made by US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in a 31 January court order and comments made during a 8 February status hearing. "The two of them risk opening a major credibility gap with the judge if they come back with a review of thousands of comments and say there isn't one substantive change they think needs to be made," Gavil said. But Gray said the settlement changes could lead to a slippery slope. "Once they start making changes, they... run the risk of opening a floodgate," he said. Kollar-Kotelly has scheduled a 6 March hearing to discuss the proposed deal, and a number of Microsoft competitors and settlement opponents have asked to make presentations. So far, the judge has denied many of the requests, but there's still the potential for the hearing to turn into a forum for demanding more changes to the settlement. But Microsoft appeared ready to avoid a flood of changes sought by the litigating states. Earlier Wednesday, ahead of filing its public-comment brief, the software giant asked Kollar-Kotelly to dismiss the litigating states' claims. The dismissal request in conjunction with changes to the settlement could end the nearly four-year-old antitrust case if the judge accepts Microsoft's reasoning. The software giant argued that the litigating states' attempt to secure stiffer sanctions against Microsoft would "displace" the Justice Department's authority in the matter and would constitute a blatant attempt to "seek to establish (state trustbusters) as national antitrust policymakers". The Justice Department, "joined by a bipartisan group of nine states, reached a settlement agreement with Microsoft that the DOJ determined to be in the national interest", said Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler. "Today's motion points out that a few states should not be able to override this determination by seeking different remedies," he said. The litigating states said Microsoft's request had no legal merit. "Microsoft's attempt to dismiss the case was expected, and late, and we will resist it strongly," said Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, one of the states' leaders. "The Microsoft position would undermine lawful, proper and practical enforcement of our country's antitrust laws by the states and perhaps by private parties," Miller said. He said the litigating states would file a response soon and would ask the judge to deny Microsoft's motion. Opening Windows
The stakes are high because of how much more the states are looking for in a court-imposed remedy vs. the settlement. The settlement largely would place restrictions on Microsoft's business practices, while the litigating states are seeking changes to how Microsoft develops and deploys software. In a December remedy proposal, the litigating states said Microsoft should give away the source code for Internet Explorer, license through auction Office for use on competing operating systems and carry Sun Microsystems' Java in Windows for 10 years. The litigating states also are targeting Microsoft's crown jewel, Windows XP. They want Microsoft to sell a stripped-down version of Windows without the so-called middleware, such as Web browsing, instant messaging and media-playback technologies. Kollar-Kotelly agreed to their request early this month for access to the Windows XP Home, Professional and Embedded source code, which is being reviewed by University of Utah Professor Lee Hollaar. "You can bet Microsoft would like nothing more than to make the states' case go away," Gray said. "But Microsoft's argument just doesn't fly because the Justice Department wasn't the only plaintiff." Gavil agreed that getting the states' claims dismissed would be tough for Microsoft. "If you look at the language of the statute, Microsoft has made a facially plausible argument, but it's not a very sensible one," Gavil said. This is just an obvious bar to the states' lawsuit; why wasn't it raised earlier -- as in May 1998, as soon as the lawsuit was filed? There's an issue of whether it's been waved and an issue of how sensible a reading of the statute it is." Unless Kollar-Kotelly dismisses the litigating states' claims, that portion of the case returns to trial March 11 to determine a remedy. The litigating states initially assembled a "Who's Who" list of Microsoft competitors to testify, including executives from AOL Time Warner, Novell, Palm, RealNetworks, Red Hat and Sun. A Gateway executive also will testify on behalf of the states. Microsoft chairman Bill Gates and chief executive Steve Ballmer are tentatively scheduled to testify during the proceeding.
Think it's all over? The antitrust case against Microsoft can still go back the to Court of Appeals, and then there's the European Commission's investigation... See ZDNet UK's DoJ/Microsoft News Section for the latest headlines. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Microsoft forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

31 minutes ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 hour ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

3 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

3 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

3 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

3 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

3 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

7 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

8 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

8 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

9 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

10 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

11 hours ago by via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

19 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
txtrainguy

Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...

1 day ago by txtrainguy on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
k0tcs3

Sure, that makes perfect sense. Pay wrong-doers money and thank them for breaching your security and pointing out your flaws, that would surely...

1 day ago by k0tcs3 on US indicts Romanian over NASA climate change hack
Random_Error

I think he's referring specifically to Android apps, as Apple do regulate their App Store, but Google seem to let any old crap onto the Android store!

1 day ago by Random_Error on RIM: BlackBerry will keep 'garbage' apps out of store
Paul Fezziwig

Keep the crap apps out?! How will they compete with Android and Apple's claim to fame of having so many life changing apps? I wonder if the media...

1 day ago by Paul Fezziwig via Facebook on RIM: BlackBerry will keep 'garbage' apps out of store