A level playing field for financial services online?

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS
The UK Treasury and the Financial Services Authority ("FSA") are inviting a further round of submissions on proposals for implementing the E-Commerce Directive (the "Directive") in respect of financial services. The proposed changes will result in amendments to the new financial promotions regime under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 ("FSMA") and also bring changes to the FSA Handbook. The new rules will affect all firms operating in the UK that provide financial services by electronic means, as well as providers in other EEA States providing such services into the UK. Interested parties, such as banks, building societies, insurance companies and underwriters, have until early May 2002 to respond to two consultations launched recently by the Treasury and by the FSA. Background to the Directive The Directive aims to remove potential restrictions on e-commerce throughout the European Economic Area (EEA) by applying the "country of origin" principle. In relation to financial services, it attempts to remove restrictions on the cross-border provision of financial services by electronic means. The country of origin principle means that, generally, in respect of "Information Society Services" ("ISS"), which for these purposes essentially means e-mail, mobile, interactive TV or web-based services, provided across borders within the EEA, the laws of the Member State in which the provider is established will apply. Except in certain circumstances, the provider need only comply with the local laws of its country of origin, irrespective of the Member State in which its services will be consumed. Effectively, this requires Member States to lift any domestic restrictions applied in respect of any incoming providers based elsewhere in the EEA. The key issues In December 2001, the Treasury invited submissions on its proposed approach to implementing the provisions of the Directive in respect of financial services. Essentially, the initial proposals reduced the number of exemptions or derogations for UK firms in respect of online promotions directed at other EEA States. Concerns were raised that a different approach to implementation by other EEA States could be detrimental to UK businesses and consumers. In addition, initial reaction to the adoption of the "country of origin" principle ranged from fears that the proposals implemented the principle too strictly to those who believed that more stringent restrictions should be placed on businesses from non-UK Member States providing their services into the UK (particularly in respect of potential market abuse cases). The Treasury's proposals The Treasury proposes to apply the "country of origin" principle, leaving scope for derogations from this approach to apply in certain circumstances (i.e. to define activities which will not be subject to the "country of origin" principle, and reserve the UK regulators' powers in relation to them) so as to minimise the risk of market abuse. The general derogations relevant to financial services cover small e-money institutions (see for example by clicking here), insurance companies, advertising by operators of UCITS (undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities), unsolicited commercial communications by email and contractual obligations in consumer agreements. In addition, case-by-case derogation allows each Member State to regulate the delivery of any service into such Member State on an individual basis provided that such measures are proportionate and necessary, or the service provider's behaviour is prejudicial within such Member State. Guidelines as to how such derogations may be made, and in what circumstances, are yet to be made available. The Treasury takes the view that once properly implemented, the "country of origin" principle will benefit UK-established financial service providers. To this end, it is continuing efforts to ensure that the Directive and the derogations are implemented properly and interpreted consistently throughout the EEA. Amendments to the FSMA The consultation paper issued by the Treasury attaches three sets of draft regulations designed to achieve the following:
  • lift restrictions on providers based elsewhere in the EEA when providing services via electronic means in to the UK.
  • ensure that the restrictions placed on UK-based firms in respect of financial promotions under the FSMA also apply regardless of whether the communication is made domestically or to a person in another Member State.
  • increase the powers of the FSA to apply rules to financial service providers in other Member States providing services into the UK, where such provider falls into one of the derogations from the "country of origin" principle.
The FSA's proposals The FSA proposes to apply the "country of origin" principle by amending the FSA Handbook. It attempts to tackle the risk of foreign firms subject to less stringent regimes gaining a competitive advantage over UK firms by promoting consumers' awareness of the implications and risks of obtaining services from abroad. The FSA uses the term "Electronic Commerce Activity" ("ECA") to describe an ISS provider delivering financial services. The proposed amendments to the FSA Handbook relate to disclosure, to UK-based firms conducting ECA in other Member States and the removal of requirements in respect of firms from other Member States conducting ECA in the UK. New information requirements: under the FSA proposals, a provider of financial services based in the UK will be required to provide, in respect of any ECA undertaken whether within the EEA or domestically, full disclosure of such information such as its name, address, its regulator and VAT number. Impact for UK firms: financial promotion requirements will be applied in full to businesses operating in the UK which are conducting ECA into another Member State and provisions that distinguish between UK customers and other EEA customers will be removed. This is designed to ensure that all EEA customers are treated equally by UK firms conducting ECA in the EEA. Impact for non-UK firms: by implementing the country of origin principle, as mentioned above, financial service providers conducting ECA from another Member State into the UK will no longer be required to comply with the FSA's business rules or be authorised under the FSA regime (unless a derogation applies) and so such provisions will be removed. Practical impact of the new rules If the proposals are adopted, UK-based financial service providers may face additional costs when providing services out of the UK to another Member State by having to comply with the UK regime (which may require higher standards of consumer protection). On the plus side, the Treasury believes that any additional costs will be offset by cost savings in not having to comply with regimes in several different jurisdictions. The greater the number of EEA countries to which a firm provides its services, the greater the cost savings. However, there is one caveat: unless the general exclusions and other derogations are interpreted consistently throughout the EEA, UK-based firms could find that they are treated differently in differing Member States after all. Next steps The consultation on the Treasury's proposals runs until 2 May 2002, and the FSA's consultation ends on 10 May 2002. The Treasury's consultation focuses on the draft statutory instruments, but also invites comments to enable it to assess the benefits and compliance costs for financial service businesses and consumers.
For more informationemail the authors or visit Olswang Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Tech Update forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. The information contained in this bulletin is intended as a general overview of the subjects featured and detailed specialist advice should always be taken before taking or refraining from taking any action.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 hour ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

3 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

3 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

3 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

4 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

4 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

4 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

4 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

5 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

8 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

9 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

9 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

10 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

11 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

12 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

21 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
txtrainguy

Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...

1 day ago by txtrainguy on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
k0tcs3

Sure, that makes perfect sense. Pay wrong-doers money and thank them for breaching your security and pointing out your flaws, that would surely...

1 day ago by k0tcs3 on US indicts Romanian over NASA climate change hack
Random_Error

I think he's referring specifically to Android apps, as Apple do regulate their App Store, but Google seem to let any old crap onto the Android store!

1 day ago by Random_Error on RIM: BlackBerry will keep 'garbage' apps out of store