ZDNet UK / News and Analysis / Business of IT / IT Strategy

MS vs US - A fight to the finish

By Joe Wilcox, CNET News, 11 June, 2002 10:40

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Topics

Microsoft, Windows, DoJ, Antitrust

NEWS
In a move that brings the four-year antitrust case against Microsoft closer to resolution, the software giant and state trustbusters on Monday delivered their last major legal filings in a hearing designed to determine remedies in the case. Both sides filed proposed "findings of fact" and "conclusions of law" with US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, who is charged with crafting a remedy to Microsoft's antitrust violations. Kollar-Kotelly will draft her own version of the same documents for her ruling, which is expected as soon as late summer. "The non-settling states paraded before the Court 13 self-interested representatives of Microsoft's competitors, many of whom have been working with the non-settling states behind the scenes for several years," Microsoft charged in its 546-page filing. "These competitors seek to use this remedy proceeding to obstruct Microsoft's ability to compete and to secure various competitive advantages for themselves at Microsoft's expense." The states took an equally harsh stance toward Microsoft's position. "No senior Microsoft executive testified regarding the justification for, or goals sought to be achieved by, Microsoft's remedy," according to the states' 596-page filing. "The key provisions of Microsoft's remedy, which ostensibly address the acts found anti-competitive by the Court of Appeals, are plagued with exceptions or ambiguities...so that they would not in fact stop or prevent antitrust violations." Both documents are essential steps toward a remedy and toward any appeal that might follow, said Emmett Stanton, an antitrust attorney with Fenwick & West in Palo Alto, Calif. "The federal rules require the judge to separately set out the court's actual findings -- the ultimate facts that are in issue -- and legal conclusions, mainly so the appellate court has a complete record to evaluate what the judge did and why," Stanton said. The filings come as Microsoft and the plaintiff states prepare to deliver closing arguments, set for 19 June. Separately, the Justice Department and nine other states settled with Microsoft in November, but Kollar-Kotelly has yet to approve the deal. Last week, Microsoft released a test version of an important Windows XP update that incorporates changes mandated by the settlement. Microsoft and the litigating states reached different conclusions about what the facts of the case are and how the remedy should be handled. Both sides assessed the 33 witnesses in the remedy hearing and gave their opinions on what key witnesses, such as states' economist Carl Shapiro or Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, contributed. Microsoft criticized the states' court presentation, charging that the plaintiff's case was full of "fatal flaws". The software giant also attempted to show that the pending settlement addresses the dozen separate antitrust violations found against the company. "The evidence and our filing today in the remedy phase show that Microsoft policies continue to raise barriers to entry, restrain operation of a free and open market in operating system software and related products, restrict consumer choice, and inhibit innovation," said Tom Miller, Iowa attorney general and one of the state's leaders. "Microsoft's proposal is so limited and backward-looking that it would not prevent practices similar to those held unlawful by the Court of Appeals -- and would have little or no effect in today's marketplace," Miller said. The judge "can take as much as she wishes from either side's submission or completely craft her own," Stanton said. U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson issued his scathing findings of fact in November 1999 and conclusions of law in April 2000. He concluded that Microsoft is a monopoly that used anti-competitive means to crush rival Netscape Communications, now owned by AOL Time Warner, in the browser market. In June 2000, he ordered Microsoft to be broken into separate operating systems and software applications companies but stayed the order pending appeal. A year later, a panel of seven appellate judges unanimously upheld the core of Jackson's findings and about a dozen separate antitrust violations against Microsoft. But the appeals court threw out his remedy, in part because Jackson failed to give Microsoft due process. Kollar-Kotelly is expected to consider both the recent proceedings and last year's appeals court ruling when she crafts her remedy. The closing arguments on June 19 are expected to end nearly two months of testimony in a hearing to determine a remedy for Microsoft's antitrust violations. Federal and state trustbusters filed the original lawsuit in May 1998. The states have asked Kollar-Kotelly for significantly stiffer sanctions than those imposed by the Justice Department settlement, which mostly mandates changes to Microsoft's business practices. The plaintiff states and the District of Columbia want Microsoft to sell a second version of Windows, from which middleware such as browsers and media players can be removed; license through auction its widespread Office software for use on competing operating systems; give away for free the source code, or blueprint, to its Internet Explorer Web browser; and carry in Windows for 10 years Sun Microsystems' version of the Java Virtual Machine, among other remedies. In some respects, the states attempted to boost their faltering case with Monday's filings, legal experts said. Several procedural gaffes marred the states' case, including one that prevented an important Windows demonstration from taking place and another that allowed Microsoft to hold back key witnesses. Microsoft has staked out the position that any additional remedy must be put in the context of the June 2001 appeals court ruling. That approach could significantly reduce the scope of the case to areas involving Microsoft's conduct in the browser market. The litigating states, in contrast, want to include instant messaging, media playback and other so-called middleware technologies. In its Monday filing, Microsoft argued against such a broadening of the case. "Although the Court of Appeals determined the scope of Microsoft's liability, the non-settling states' witnesses raised a number of new allegations of misconduct by Microsoft," according to the filing. "Those allegations were shown to be without merit during the remedy proceeding." Some antitrust experts said Microsoft's position is a sleight of hand trick designed to draw attention away from the full breadth of the antitrust ruling. The states agreed in their filing. "The remedial objectives mandated by the Court of Appeals cannot be met by merely ordering Microsoft to cease the specific acts directed against Navigator and Java," according to the states' proposed conclusions of law. Had Microsoft been found guilty of violating only Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, said legal experts, the company's argument might hold water. But the company was also found to have violated the act's second section. Section 1 violations tend to deal with areas of specific conduct between more than one party. Exclusive contracts and price-fixing are examples. Section 2 violations, which include abuse of monopoly power, are much broader and are not necessarily defined by specific acts. In the case of Microsoft, which was found to have illegally maintained a monopoly, the courts would have to explore what means might be necessary to remove the power to abuse that monopoly. Issues surrounding the operating system could come into play. "Microsoft's theory misses the point," said Jeff Shohet an antitrust attorney with Gray Cary in San Diego. "The offence of Section 2 is being a monopolist. Simply going to specific conduct that you used to preserve or defend that market power doesn't address the whole problem." The appeals court ruling, Shohet said, requires a more far-reaching remedy. "You've got to share the code," Shohet said. "You have to make sure the competitors have free and fair access to it and make sure they aren't shut out. You have to do all the things that prevent the abuse of power. You have to forget about the (specific) conduct."
Think it's all over? The antitrust case against Microsoft can still go back the to Court of Appeals, and then there's the European Commission's investigation... See ZDNet UK's DoJ/Microsoft News Section for the latest headlines. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Microsoft forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Related stories

Ballmer leads new Microsoft witness list

Our next witness: Bill Gates

Trial: Now it's Microsoft's turn

Expert: Windows can be broken into parts

DOJ: Microsoft case not strong enough

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

4 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

13 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

21 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

23 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

24 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material

Latest in IT Strategy

Heart of England NHS begins massive digitisation plan

Hard-drive woes hit PC shipments in fourth quarter

Featured white papers

Value of a team: Five pillars to strengthen employee culture

Citrix Online

Value of a team: Five pillars to strengthen employee culture

This white paper explores how to define objectives for employees and clients and how the business can benefit from encouraging... Read more

Key trends driving global business resilience and risk

IBM

Key trends driving global business resilience and risk

This IBM research paper looks at how businesses are thinking more about business resilience by improving the ability to adapt to a continuously changing business... Read more

Cloud computing security: A practical guide

SunGard Availability Services

Cloud computing security: A practical guide

Cloud computing has been the belle of the IT ball, but can you trust it to keep data reliable and... Read more

Inside ZDNet UK

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

2012 Predictions: VCE FastPath, VI SAN Probe & Hadoop

2012 Predictions: VCE FastPath, VI SAN Probe & Hadoop

BlackBerry Bold 9790

BlackBerry Bold 9790

Make faster, smarter decisions using BI

Make faster, smarter decisions using BI

Ten factors that make Ubuntu 11.10 a hit

Ten factors that make Ubuntu 11.10 a hit

Toshiba Portégé Z830-10P Review

Toshiba Portégé Z830-10P Review

BT's archive: Pictures from the vault

BT's archive: Pictures from the vault