Fed-up customers want faster bug alerts

NEWS

Corporate customers are sick and tired of software flaws. A study of more than 300 companies published last week found that nearly 80 percent of companies support security consultants and hackers releasing information about software vulnerabilities even when the developers aren't prepared, and that they want news of potential flaws within a week. The desire for greater and more rapid disclosure comes more out of spite than as a way to increase security. Slightly more than half of those in favour of disclosure seemed to support it as a way to embarrass software companies that haven't done an adequate job busting bugs in their programs, rather than as a way to protect themselves against future attack. "They are tired of software vendors not writing good code," said Pete Lindstrom, director of security strategies for the Hurwitz Group, a technology consultancy. "The end users are the ones saying we don't care about time periods, we don't care about patches -- just get the information out." The findings undermine the push by several software makers, most notably Microsoft, and some security consultants, to define "responsible" disclosure as the release of information after a developer has had a chance to create a patch or after 30 days, whichever comes first. The fact that corporate software customers -- those hurt worst by software makers' slipups -- disagree with the delayed-disclosure policy removes a much-touted claim from the developers' side of the debate that they have customers' interests at heart. "Every time we see a vendor scream about (a bug being disclosed before) 30 days, and that that hurts the end-user... the customers are saying that's crazy," Lindstrom said. The focus on software maker liability for shoddy products has gained steam this year with a report released by the National Academy of Sciences recommending that federal lawmakers create legal guidelines to hold companies responsible for bugs in applications that affect security. Software customers seem to not want to wait for Washington to weigh in. More than two-thirds of the companies polled felt that a bug should be made public in a week or less, even if the maker of the application is not prepared. The vast majority of companies split, however, on how much information should be made available: 40 percent for only a general description of the flaw and another 40 percent for a more detailed report. Very few companies thought that "exploit code" -- source code that could be used to create an attack program -- should be included in the report. While software companies' customers seem to be generally dissatisfied with the quality of the product they're buying, they aren't ready to switch to another provider based on poor security alone, the survey found. "It is really kind of fascinating," said Lindstrom. "Not only do you have end users that are fed up, but despite that, no one will get rid of their software because of vulnerabilities. There doesn't seem to be a great answer to this." The survey also found that more than two-thirds of respondents felt that the cost of security incidents caused by flaws were low or negligible. Other data also showed that most companies thought the media overhyped security vulnerabilities and that very few got information about flaw from the news. Most relied on industry-focused mailing lists.

For all security-related news, including updates on the latest viruses, hacking exploits and patches, check out ZDNet UK's Viruses and Hacking News Section. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Security forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

ZDNet UK Live

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

3 minutes ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

22 minutes ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

26 minutes ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

43 minutes ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

4 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

5 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

5 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

6 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

7 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

8 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

17 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility

Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...

23 hours ago by txtrainguy on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility

Sure, that makes perfect sense. Pay wrong-doers money and thank them for breaching your security and pointing out your flaws, that would surely...

24 hours ago by k0tcs3 on US indicts Romanian over NASA climate change hack

I think he's referring specifically to Android apps, as Apple do regulate their App Store, but Google seem to let any old crap onto the Android store!

24 hours ago by Random_Error on RIM: BlackBerry will keep 'garbage' apps out of store