'Cambridge phenomenon' threatened by IP changes

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Academics at Cambridge are warning that restrictive new intellectual property rules proposed by the university could mean an end to the high-tech boom that gave rise to the nickname "Silicon Fen". Ross Anderson, a reader in security engineering at Cambridge's Computer Laboratory, said that the proposed changes could mean an end to the "Cambridge Phenomenon" that spawned such world-class companies as chip designer ARM Holdings, as well as hurting Cambridge's ability to attract top-quality researchers. "People need incentives to work effectively, and by destroying the incentives at Cambridge, the phenomenon that has seen hundreds of high-tech companies grow up around the town in recent years," Anderson said. The concerns of Anderson and other faculty members centre on a report issued last week by the university's Council and General Board, its central governing bodies, which recommends that Cambridge University "asserts ownership of all intellectual property generated by its employees in the normal course of their duties, from 1 January, 2003." The report argues that while private spin-offs from the university have been very successful, researchers currently "have both the benefit and the burden of exploiting their technology... without specialist advice they may... prove vulnerable to predatory external parties, and any commercial deals done may be of variable quality." To remedy this issue, the report argues, "the University needs a supportive infrastructure to ensure that where opportunities for application of new knowledge arise, the benefits to society are not lost." This would be achieved through requiring researchers to cede to the university ownership of all intellectual property generated in the course of their university work, and then collaborate with the university on commercialising their inventions. The report was published on the university's Web site and included in the university newsletter. Currently, Cambridge researchers keep the rights to their ideas unless they are generated in the course of sponsored research. Changing the rules would drastically change the working environment for scientists at Cambridge, Anderson argues. "This will change the Cambridge regime from being one of the most liberal in the UK to one of the most locked-down," he stated. Cambridge's IP rules are similar to the liberal regimes at the Massachussetts Institite of Technology and Stanford -- on which the current Cambridge policy was based in the 1980s -- both of which have spun out a large number of high-tech companies. Stanford, along with the University of California at Berkeley, is credited with supplying the brainpower that made Silicon Valley possible. By contrast, Anderson argues that there is a large amount of evidence that universities which claim ownership of any research carried out by faculty, such as Johns Hopkins University, produce very little commercialised research. However, the university's report dismisses the idea that Cambridge's IP policies are linked to the "Cambridge phenomenon". "This rationalisation may be superficially attractive but is unprovable and a policy based on assertion and belief is hard to justify," the report states. "Given the inconsistency in the current policy, it is hard to justify its continuation without a mechanism for eliciting disclosure of all inventions made using significant University resources," it continues. Instead of modifying the current policy, the report argues that the policy should be replaced. A provision on copyright may also lead to issues specifically affecting software created by university faculty, which Anderson believes could ultimately prevent faculty from releasing their software projects under open-source licences. Licences such as the General Public License allow software source code to be freely modified and redistributed, as long as the modifications are released back to the community. The provision claims copyright on "works (that have) have been commissioned by a sponsor or by the University", which could be taken to include material prepared for lectures, Anderson argues. "If we individually own our software, we can blow a raspberry at the likes of Microsoft," he said. "But once they centralise control of copyright in the university... a bureaucrat could put through some measures during summer holiday, and suddenly university software can't be released under the GPL." Anderson noted that the university's largest private donor is Microsoft, a company which is openly hostile to open-source software. Anderson hopes to raise enough opposition to the changes to prevent them from coming to a vote in the Regent House, where it would be difficult to block the new rules from coming into force.
For a round-up of the latest tech business coverage, see the Business News Section. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

47 minutes ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

5 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

15 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

23 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material