Microsoft looks to European resolution

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Microsoft hopes to use its Friday antitrust victory in the US as a starting point for resolving legal troubles in Europe. In separate actions on Friday, US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly approved with few changes a November 2001 settlement between Microsoft, the Justice Department and nine states and then she issued the revised settlement as her remedy in continued litigation brought by nine other states and the District of Columbia. Her ruling, which University of Baltimore Law School professor Bob Lande described as "basically appeal-proof", is likely to bring the four-and-a-half year-old antitrust case to an end. But that doesn't mean Microsoft's problems with trustbusters are over. The European Union's Competition Commission is investigating allegations Microsoft used its dominance in desktop operating systems to gain an unfair advantage in the server software market. A preliminary ruling is expected by the end of the year. But Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft takes the stance that Friday's ruling could help resolve the investigation on the continent. "The European case is the next closest to this one and the next closest to resolution," said Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel. "We do hope that the European Commission will consider (Friday's) decision as a reference point and we do hope they will weigh this information carefully with everything else they may consider." Smith also indicated that Microsoft would be willing to resume talks that might bring a quicker resolution to the European antitrust case. It's hard to gauge what impact Kollar-Kotelly's ruling would have on the European Commission investigation, Lande said. "You have to wonder about the psychological effect on the EU," he said. Smith was quick not to tie together too closely the two cases, which focussed on very different issues. The US case largely examined whether Microsoft had used its dominance in desktop operating systems to thwart Netscape Communications, now owned by AOL Time Warner, in the browser market. "We wouldn't want to suggest that just because the court on one side of the Atlantic does something, that decision makers on the other side of the Atlantic will necessarily follow suit," Smith said. Still, the company sees certain aspects of Kollar-Kotelly's ruling -- particularly one regarding the removal of so-called middleware code from the operating system -- as important reading for European trustbusters. "The most important part of (Friday's) decision for the case in Brussels is the court's discussion on code removal and its clear rejection of code removal as something that would be harmful to the industry, consumers and the economy," Smith said. The European Commission expanded its case last year to include media playback software that Microsoft includes with both desktop and server versions of Windows. Microsoft bundles -- or integrates -- the software into the operating system. The plaintiff states attempted to similarly expand the scope of the US case, but Kollar-Kotelly rejected the inclusion of so-called middleware technologies such as instant messaging and media playback in her remedy for Microsoft's antitrust violations. The states had asked the judge to compel Microsoft to release a second version of Windows from which middleware could be removed. They did this to address an appellate court finding that Microsoft's "commingling" software code between Internet Explorer and Windows 98 to be an anticompetitive act designed to hurt Netscape. The plaintiff states sought "to broaden the view of commingling to encompass any circumstance in which operating system code is included in the same files as code that plaintiffs have characterised as non-operating system or middleware code," Kollar-Kotelly wrote in the memorandum accompanying her ruling. While "plaintiffs have advanced a remedy that requires the removal of Windows source code", they "have been unsuccessful at distinguishing the code which comprises an operating system from so-called middleware", she wrote. During testimony at trial, Microsoft chairman Bill Gates said removing so-called middleware code from Windows would break the operating system. In another portion of her memorandum, Kollar-Kotelly noted that the plaintiff states presented no economic justification for removing the "non-operating system" code. The judge, in fact, accepted Microsoft's claims that removing the code would cause economic harm. "That's fundamentally the same test that officials at the European Commission will be considering," Smith said, referring to the potential economic consequences. But Glenn Manishin, an antitrust attorney with Kelley Drye & Warren in Vienna, Virginia, questioned the impact Kollar-Kotelly's comments on code removal would have on European trustbusters. "I think the decision will only assist the EU's analysis if the EU agrees with her conclusions," he said. "It's a factual conclusion whether or not elements can be removed from Windows without hurting the integrity of the product. As a matter of fact, I think the EU is going to make its own judgment." Analysts wonder if Microsoft might benefit more from recent legal setbacks in Europe than by any impact Kollar-Kotelly's decision might make. A European Union court recently ruled against the Competition Commission on three merger prohibitions. Those setbacks could change the approach on Microsoft. Those decisions might deter Competition Commissioner Mario Monti "from taking an aggressive interpretation on dominance policy, called market dominance", Manishin said. The Competition Commission could not be reached for comment. But Rich Gray, a Menlo Park, California-based attorney closely following the trial, noted that the other cases "were mergers, which follow a very different set of criteria than antitrust cases". Gray wondered if the European Commission might slow its investigation of Microsoft as the agency recoups from its recent losses. Lande agreed, but only to a point. "Will they take more time to do it right or will they just back off?" he asked.
Think it's all over? The antitrust case against Microsoft can still go back the to Court of Appeals, and then there's the European Commission's investigation... See ZDNet UK's DoJ/Microsoft News Section for the latest headlines. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Microsoft forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

1 hour ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

6 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

15 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

23 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material