Home Office: We got data retention wrong

NEWS

The Home Office made a startling admission on Thursday morning that its plans for making ISPs retain details of customer emails and Web surfing have not worked out as it had hoped, and the UK is now "back to square one". Problems range from incompatibilities -- which the Home Office now appears to accept -- between no less than four different laws, to public concern over how they can access their data, how it can be accessed, and what redress they have when something goes wrong. Speaking at a seminar for ISPs at Streaming Media Europe, a Home Office official said the government is now "looking to consult in the New Year on what data retention regime the public will be happy with". The admission follows an embarrassing six months for the Home Office over the issue of data retention. In June, when it issued a voluntary code of practice laying out who can access the retained data and how they can access it, there was uproar over the number of government agencies that would have access to individual's Internet and phone records. These ranged from local authorities, to the NHS, the Postal Services Commission and the Food Standards Agency. The agencies, all of which have some law enforcement authority, were not previously guaranteed access to the records without a court order. A code of practice is demanded by the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (ATCS). Elizabeth France, the Information Commissioner, later said the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA), which deals with access to the retained data once it has been retained under ATCS, was likely to break the Human Rights Act (HRA). Her stance was later backed up by other European Information Commissioners who said there could be incompatibilities with data protection legislation. In October, ISP Association (ISPA) general secretary Nicholas Lansmann advised members in a letter that was leaked to The Guardian not to agree to the Home Office voluntary code of practice covering data retention. Among the reasons that Lansmann gave was the fact that a year since the first draft was released, the Home Office has failed to explain how ISPs will be reimbursed for retaining the data, or how they can comply with the code without breaking numerous other laws. Some ISPs want a mandatory code of conduct so they will not be held liable in cases where different laws conflict. Said one: "Because the code of practice is voluntary, customers will sue us. We need the government to make the code of practice mandatory so the government gets sued when things go wrong and not us." Ian Walden, head of IT law at Queen Mary College, agreed. "I think ISPs are quite right to say they won't agree to a voluntary code of practice because it exposes them to all kinds of liability," he said. Speaking to ISPs at Streaming Media Europe on Thursday, Lansmann said the atmosphere finally appears to be changing. "We are getting very strong signals from the Home Office that occasionally legislation gets passed and sometimes it is not entirely right. I think that is happening now, and it looks like we will eventually have a law that provides clarity and ensures privacy of the citizen." The Home Office official, who attended the event to reassure ISPs that the government has realised the error of its ways, said "Sometimes we have to admit that we got it a bit wrong, and [this time] we got it a bit wrong." "Just over a year ago, the Home Office had no plans for data retention. Then along came 11 September and we suddenly changed our plans so that now we do want data retention," said the official. "It has increasingly become the case that the scheme we have in ATCS will work after a fashion but not in the way we intended," he said. "There are concerns people had that have come to pass, and now we are almost back to square one." The UK still has no data retention framework in place. The official said the Home Office has learnt from the mistake it made with the publication of the draft code of practice in June. "A large part of the problem we had in June was putting something down on paper without explaining to people exactly what it was," he said. "We didn't explain for instance what the Food Standards Agency is, what it does, and why it might need access to data." "People need to be clear over who can do what and in what circumstances. People thought every Tom Dick and Harry in every Town Hall would be able to access all our data, but we didn't explain why they would not be able to. There are procedures." The government has to explain who needs access, he added, why they need access, under circumstances people can expect their data to be accessed, and what redress they have when something goes wrong. Richard Allan, Liberal MP for Sheffield Hallam, said: "We're still in the position where the Home Office is saying we may have a mandatory data retention scheme for many years, or a voluntary data retention scheme for a much lower number of years. We hope to influence that."

Who's watching you? Get the latest on spy networks such as Echelon and Carnivore, as well as privacy issues for companies and individuals alike, at ZDNet UK's Privacy News Section. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

ZDNet UK Live

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

2 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

7 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

16 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

Home Office: We got data retention wrong

Daily Newsletters

Topics

Related stories

New powers put privacy laws to the test

RIPA surveillance may break human rights laws

ISPs revolt against data retention law

Heart of England NHS begins massive digitisation plan

Hard-drive woes hit PC shipments in fourth quarter

Post your comment

ZDNet UK Live

Latest in IT Strategy

Heart of England NHS begins massive digitisation plan

Hard-drive woes hit PC shipments in fourth quarter

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

PHP Web Developer - html, css, javascript

Java Developer, Online Gaming, London

Quant Dev, Hedge Fund, FX, Excel VBA

Inside ZDNet UK

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

2012 Predictions: VCE FastPath, VI SAN Probe & Hadoop

BlackBerry Bold 9790

Make faster, smarter decisions using BI

Ten factors that make Ubuntu 11.10 a hit

Toshiba Portégé Z830-10P Review

BT's archive: Pictures from the vault

News & Analysis

Reviews

Blogs

Resources

About Us

Member Services

Special Features

Advertising Features

ZDNet UK / News and Analysis / Business of IT / IT Strategy

Home Office: We got data retention wrong

Daily Newsletters

Topics

Related stories

Post your comment

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Latest in IT Strategy

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

Inside ZDNet UK

Resources

About Us

Member Services

Special Features

Advertising Features