Intergraph sues PC giants over Pentium

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Topics

Intel, intergraph

NEWS
Intergraph has filed suit against Dell, Gateway and Hewlett-Packard, alleging that the PC companies violated its patents by incorporating Pentium-family processors into their computers. The lawsuit -- which could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars and eventually have an impact on every PC maker that used Intel chips in the last seven years -- is based on a similar intellectual-property suit launched by Intergraph against Intel that was settled in April this year. In that case, filed in 1997, Intergraph claimed that Intel's Pentium, Pentium Pro, Pentium II, Pentium III and other processors infringed on patents embodied in its Clipper chip. Under the settlement, Intel agreed to pay Intergraph $300m (£187m). The deal, however, did not insulate companies that incorporated Intel processors into their computers from suits based on the same patents. The chipmaker is obliged to send a letter to PC makers notifying them of that circumstance, said an Intergraph spokeswoman. If Intergraph's legal arguments hold water, HP and the other PC makers may have to compensate the company for any gain they may have received from selling Intel-based PCs since 1995 -- through the biggest boom in the history of the computer industry. However, as the case with Intel was settled, no court has ruled on the ultimate validity of Intergraph's Pentium-related patents. Intergraph did not state the amount it was seeking in the current suit. Settlement discussions are under way with PC companies, said an Intergraph spokeswoman. "We are looking at each vendor individually," she said. "We continue to negotiate with people." When asked why IBM was not named as a defendant in the current case, the spokeswoman replied, "We have a close relationship with IBM." In many ways, Intergraph's legal activity underscores the massive changes the company has undergone in the past five years. In the 1980s, the company came to prominence as a workstation manufacturer, competing directly against Sun Microsystems and SGI. Intergraph's workstations were based around its own Clipper microprocessor and graphics technologies. But in late 1993, the company made an abrupt shift, announcing that it would use cheaper Intel chips in its workstations. Subsequently, the first ripples of what would become a massive dispute between Intergraph and Intel appeared. Intergraph accused Intel of violating antitrust laws and of infringing its processor patents. Around the same time, Intergraph exited the hardware market to concentrate on software and services. While the courts threw out Intergraph's antitrust claims, the company's patent infringement claims have fared better. In addition to the Pentium suit, Intergraph won a separate case against Intel that alleged its Itanium chip violated other Intergraph patents. The trial court awarded Intergraph $150 million in that case in July. The suit took place in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the same court that will hear the current dispute. Intel is appealing the Itanium-related case, but will not be allowed to recover the $150m in any event and may have to pay $100m more in damages if it loses the appeal. Legal gains Intergraph's revenue from legal activity now rivals its services and software business. In the first nine months of 2002, Intergraph's revenue from services and software came to $379.2m, with a total of $532m expected for the year, according to the company. By comparison, its court-mandated payments from Intel alone this year come to $450m and could rise to $550m. Earlier this year, Intergraph formed a unit to protect its intellectual property and pursue licensing deals. Recently, Fujitsu entered into a licensing deal with Intergraph connected to the patents underlying the Itanium suit. Obtaining a settlement or a verdict against PC makers, though, will take work. Intergraph's tussle with Intel took years to resolve, for instance. In 1998, a trial court in Alabama ruled that the chipmaker infringed on Intergraph's patents. Subsequently, another court reversed that decision, stating that Intergraph's claims were not valid. Then an appeals court reversed that decision, but did not reinstate the original court's conclusions. Although Intergraph has filed the suit, the spokeswoman was unclear whether it had been filed on the defendants as yet. Representatives from both Dell and HP said they have not seen the suit and could not comment. Gateway did not immediately repsond to requests for comment.
See Chips Central for the latest headlines on processors and semiconductors. To find out more about the computers and hardware that these chips are being used in, see ZDNet UK's Hardware News Section. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Chips Central Forum. Let the Chips Central editor know what you think by email. And sign up for the weekly Chips Central newsletter.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

2 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

4 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

9 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

18 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint