Kazaa fires back at Hollywood, labels

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Sharman Networks, owner of the popular Kazaa file-swapping software, has launched a legal counterstrike against the major record labels and Hollywood studios, asserting they have "obscenely" abused their copyright powers. In a lawsuit filed late on Monday in federal court in Los Angeles, Sharman claims that major entertainment companies have colluded to drive potential online rivals out of business. The conduct should preclude the industry from being able to defend its copyrights in court, at least until the behaviour is corrected, Sharman contends. The lawsuit is a counterstrike by Sharman, which has been sued for allegedly contributing to massive online copyright infringement. Last week, a federal judge ruled that record companies and movie studios can proceed with their lawsuit against Sharman. The entertainment industry considers Sharman to be as much an outlaw as Napster and Aimster, two file-sharing services that have been shuttered. But Sharman executives say their business is fundamentally different because the company was created to take advantage of legal online distribution. "What the industry is incapable of doing is realising that Kazaa is different," said Sharman attorney Rod Dorman. "Now (they) have got to face the legal consequences." The lawsuit marks a significant development in the most critical online copyright case since the disappearance of Napster. Sharman is being sued along with Grokster and Morpheus parent Streamcast Networks. The popularity of Kazaa, the leading file-trading service in the United States, has brought it to the top of copyright holders' list of online enemies. Sharman purchased the Kazaa software in early 2002 and planned to make money by distributing authorised, copy-protected content, its attorneys said. Other companies, however, also have entered the file-swapping business contending their plans were legal. Early entrant Scour turned on its file-trading service only after seeking the advice of top Hollywood copyright lawyers. But that didn't prevent it from being sued and driven out of business. The "legal consequences" Sharman is seeking are potentially severe. Sharman is asking the judge to declare the copyright holders guilty of antitrust and related violations, and to bar them from enforcing any of their copyrights. According to the lawsuit, Sharman and a partner called Altnet met repeatedly with movie and music industry executives over the course of 2002, seeking to license copy-protected content for online distribution. Providing legal, authorised versions of popular entertainment content would help mitigate piracy on the file-swapping system, Sharman and Altnet said. A few industry executives were interested, but were "repeatedly instructed" not to pursue relationships with Sharman or Altnet by the Recording Industry Association of America and other trade groups, attorneys for Sharman said. Altnet chief executive Kevin Bermeister said on Monday he supports Sharman's claims. "Altnet confirms the allegations made by Sharman, relating to Altnet, in its counterclaim against the record and motion picture industries," Bermeister said in a prepared statement. "While we have seen a shift in consumers' willingness to pay for the licensed content we now supply, that behaviour would be further along if we enjoyed the full support and cooperation of the entertainment industries." Recording industry executives have maintained that Sharman was created to take advantage of online piracy and that there is no need to negotiate with the company. "Sharman and its cohort Kazaa, which built the world's largest piracy network, premised on flouting copyright laws and not obtaining licensees, now claim that a lack of licensing has somehow inhibited their development," an RIAA spokesman said. "This proposition is laughable, but the real harm to creators and copyright owners is no joking matter." Although unconventional, the copyright misuse and antitrust claims have been the sole bright spot in file-swapping companies' repeated string of losses in court. Last year, federal judge Marilyn Hall Patel ordered an investigation into the record labels' licensing practices towards online companies and into the structure of Pressplay and Musicnet, services largely owned by record labels. "The evidence now shows that the plaintiffs have licensed their catalogues of works for digital distribution in what could be an overreaching manner," Patel wrote in a February 2002 decision that was part of the Napster lawsuit. "The evidence also suggests the (record labels') entry into the digital distribution marketplace may run afoul of antitrust laws." Napster went out of business before that investigation or court case could be concluded. However, a United States Department of Justice antitrust investigation of the music labels, begun in 2001, has yet to conclude. Meanwhile, some of the initial criticism of the labels' reluctance to license to digital music companies has passed, as subscription services such as Listen.com's Rhapsody have won rights to large music catalogues. Along with the sweeping antitrust claims, Sharman's legal defence rests on familiar grounds. The Kazaa software is a technology that has considerable non-infringing uses, and cannot therefore be deemed illegal, the company says. That argument harks back to a Supreme Court ruling defending the legality of the videocassette recorder against a copyright lawsuit mounted by the movie industry. Judges have not given the "non-infringing use" argument much sway in previous file-swapping cases, but Sharman appears to have more to show than predecessors Napster and Aimster. Together, Sharman and Altnet distribute more than 15 million copy-protected files per month though the Kazaa network, the company says in its legal papers. Kazaa's own popularity has now outstripped Napster's, even at its peak. The software has been downloaded at least 181 million times, according to Download.com, a software aggregation site owned by CNET Networks, publisher of ZDNet UK. Many of those downloads have been upgrades or duplicate copies, however. The federal judge in the Sharman case is still considering separate requests by the copyright holders and Streamcast Networks to decide the case quickly, without going to a full trial.
See the MP3/P2P News Section for the latest on everything from MP3 players to Napster and the other file-swapping services. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Talkback

Sounds to me like this whole issue makes ownership not mean a thing. Ok i buy a cd so i own it which means i can do whatever i want with it, but, i guess not. So what if i want to rip the album to MP3's, it's mine. But they don't want you to do that. Insted of being able to burn a new cd when the one you paid $20 gets scracthed or ruined, they want you to buy another one. Ok, here's all this grerat technology for using digital media and burning/copying cd's. Ok buy our DVD burners for $300 buy all the stuff that's out there to support the economy. BUT, don't use it or you'll get sued. Bull****

via Facebook 13 January, 2004 20:16
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

17 minutes ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

3 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

6 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

11 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

20 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint