SCO threatened to terminate IBM's Unix rights in a letter sent on Thursday to IBM chief executive San Palmisano. The letter said IBM breached its contract with SCO by "subjecting our Unix trade secrets to unrestricted disclosure, unauthorized transfer and disposition, unauthorised use, and has otherwise encouraged others in the Linux development community to do the same." One key part of the dispute hinges on language in "Amendment X," a 1996 modification of the original Unix contract IBM signed with AT&T in 1985. Amendment X grants IBM "irrevocable" and "perpetual" rights to Unix. However, Sontag pointed to the next sentence in the agreement, which reads, "Notwithstanding the above, the irrevocable nature of the above rights will in no way be construed to limit...SCO's rights to enjoin or otherwise prohibit IBM from violating...SCO's rights under this amendment." Rich Gray, a Silicon Valley intellectual property attorney, said it's not unusual for licence agreements to employ apparently contradictory terms about whether a licence is perpetual and irrevocable. "There could be provisions in the agreement that say the licence is terminated upon the happening of certain events," Gray said. In other words, "the licence is perpetual so long as the licence agreement itself stays in force." If IBM chooses to continue shipping Unix, SCO will go to court over the matter, Sontag said. "This is a legal agreement. They are obligated to the terms. If they violate the agreement, we will get a court order. If they violate the court order, they will be in contempt of court," Sontag said. Gray said the heart of the battle will take place in court. "They'll send a letter back on the licence agreement issue. But the real fight is going to be in court," he said. IBM is likely to fight back directly, arguing that it hasn't improperly used any Unix trade secrets, Gray predicted. IBM took issue with the suit's language that IBM is "destroy all value of Unix." To the contrary, "AIX is the fastest-growing Unix in the industry. We've never been more committed to AIX," Fay said. IBM shipped $3.6bn worth of Unix servers in 2002 and is gaining market share, according to Gartner. Open-source backlash
Although SCO executives are careful to say they have no issues with the Linux community or collaborative open-source development process in general, SCO's actions have triggered negative responses among many, including a proposed boycott "SCO has trashed their business, thus this has to be just an exit strategy," said Bruce Perens, an open-source advocate and unofficial spokesman for the movement. "We really wanted these guys to be our partners, for years. We tried, and they never really did," Perens said. SCO, Caldera Systems before acquiring the SCO Unix products, sells a version of Linux that never has the market share of competing products from companies such as Red Hat and SuSE. SCO's Linux product now is based on SuSE's Linux version through a consortium called UnitedLinux. In the wake of SCO's lawsuit, SuSE chief executive Richard Seibt said on Friday that his company is "re-evaluating our relationship with the SCO Group." "We at SuSE were greatly disappointed to learn of the SCO Group's recent actions...(and) while we strongly believe that this does not impact Linux, we are concerned that these actions are not in the best interest of customers, partners and the Linux community," Seibt said. And the suit does indeed affect the open-source realm, Gray said. "The risk IBM is facing," Gray said, "is an application by SCO Group to the court for a preliminary injunction to stop further shipments of Unix-based products and, potentially, Linux-based products which in turn are based on the supposedly purloined trade secrets."
For all your GNU/Linux and open-source news, from the latest kernel releases to the newest distributions, see ZDNet UK's Linux News Section.
Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.
