ANALYSIS
The most obvious question is, "How did SCO Group get the footing to file such a lawsuit anyway?" After developing Unix in the 60s and turning it into a broad commercial operating system in the 80s, AT&T's Bell Labs sold all of the rights (and, more important, all of its licensing contracts) to Novell in 1992. Novell hoped to meld its Novell operating system with Unix in a last-ditch effort to thwart Microsoft's attempt to move into the enterprise. At the time of the acquisition, Microsoft was still a year away from introducing its first version of Windows NT, and Novell looked like a sure bet to migrate from a file/print-only operating system to a true client/server platform. But Novell's inability to resolve the inherent conflict between the use of Unix as its application platform and its own Netware Loadable Module (NLM) technology led it to ultimately sell its rights to Unix to the SCO Group in 1995. Novell's primary benefit from the technology acquisition turned out to be its implementation of Novell Directory Services (NDS) for Unix variants, giving it a chance to be a player in the enterprise directory space. However, SCO was in the best position to reap the benefits of ownership of Unix technology. SCO, a former AT&T Unix licensee, had been the primary source of independent Unix distributions. Companies such as Sun (Solaris), IBM (AIX), and HP (HP/UX) had versions of Unix for their own hardware based on technology that they had licensed originally from AT&T and that was now owned by SCO. In recent years, the importance of SCO as a Unix vendor has been diminishing rapidly as Linux has taken over the Unix market. Also, Linux penetration was almost exclusively in the x86 market that SCO used to dominate. As Linux has been ported to other hardware platforms, the desire for "Pure Unix" has basically disappeared. But while Sun and HP have continued to support their existing Unix platforms, IBM has aggressively moved to displace its own Unix derivative with Linux. Although SCO has been able to create and market other innovative technologies on the Unix platform (most notably Tarantella, a Citrix-like product for the Unix market), the company has become inconsequential in the overall market for Unix/Linux. At a minimum, this lawsuit allows SCO to profit from the work that other vendors have done to build their businesses around Linux. How? If the central allegation of the lawsuit is true -- and logic dictates that it probably is -- a huge number of vendors using Linux and their customers are in violation of an intellectual property agreement owned by SCO. The central allegation is that IBM used SCO's knowledge (and perhaps even actual code) of the Unix code base gained in its implementation of AIX to develop and enhance the implementation of Linux on its hardware platforms.
