Windows Server 2003 launches, at last

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Microsoft on Thursday will launch the most ambitious version yet of its Windows server operating system, as the company looks to push aside Unix servers and mainframes in the enterprise. Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer will officially launch Windows Server 2003 at a press conference in San Francisco. Microsoft's customers have had the software since early April, when a code key capable of unlocking potentially tens of thousands of copies of the software leaked out onto the Internet. Microsoft released final, or gold, code at the end of March. Also on Thursday, Microsoft plans to launch Visual Studio .Net 2003, a new version of its development tools, and SQL Server 2003, an update of its database server software. Microsoft will attempt to woo cash-strapped technology managers to Windows Server 2003 by touting the benefits of working with a single OS, the advantages for server consolidation and the cost savings compared to Unix servers and mainframes. The company plans to spend as much as $250m (£157m) over the next year promoting Windows Server 2003 in print, television, Web and outdoor advertisements. The software has been a long time coming. From conception to release of final code, Windows Server 2003 has seen four different names and four release dates. In October 2000, Microsoft said the product would ship in the second half of 2001. But in April 2001, it pushed back delivery to early 2002. In March 2002, it again delayed delivery until the second half of the year. In November, the company delayed delivery for a third time, setting an April launch date. Potential buyers also will need to navigate a product lineup that is more complex than with previous versions. Windows Server 2003 is available in seven different versions. The main ones are Datacenter, for top-end machines with dozens of processors and high reliability requirements; Enterprise Server, for more mainstream multiprocessor servers; Standard Server, for low-end servers; and new Web Server for low-end machines used to send Web pages to Internet browsers. Microsoft plans to release a fifth product, Windows Small Business Server 2003, in the third quarter. Also available: 64-bit versions of Datacenter and Enterprise versions for Itanium processors. Pricing for Windows Server 2003 remains largely unchanged from earlier versions, according to Microsoft. Businesses evaluating an upgrade to Windows Server 2003 need to look beyond Microsoft's hype and carefully evaluate their needs, say analysts and companies that participated in an early-adopter program. For many businesses, the move to Windows Server 2003 will be slow, in part because of the frequent delays in its debut. Those delays have meant that customers such as Analog Devices, which would have been a strong candidate for the new product, moved to Windows 2000 -- an older version of Windows -- instead of waiting for Windows Server 2003. Analog Devices is near the end of a switchover from the seven-year-old Windows NT 4 Server, according to the company. Peter Forte, data warehouse director for Analog Devices said, "We're just finishing up everything (on) Windows 2000. So we have some time before we bite off an aggressive plan to go to Windows 2003." Analog Devices would likely "start to (switch to) Windows 2003 in nine to 12 months," Forte said. "I wouldn't say that Analog is on the bleeding edge of adopting the technology." Analog Devices may represent the market fairly accurately. IDC analyst Al Gillen estimated that "the majority of businesses would spend 12 months or more evaluating Windows Server 2003" before making the switch. Still, analysts said there are three scenarios that might call for a faster switch: Server consolidation from Windows Server NT 4; server consolidation to Itanium 2-based systems from Unix servers or mainframes; and installation of other Microsoft software, such as SharePoint Portal Server or Windows Rights Management Services, that requires Windows Server 2003. Tough economic conditions and a large number of Windows NT 4 Server installations -- about 35 percent of the total Windows Server-installed base -- would help move along the early adopters, say analysts. In both scenarios, server consolidation, either from Unix or Windows NT 4 Server, would be important factors driving new Windows Server 2003 installations. Michael Cherry, an analyst with Market Researcher Directions on Microsoft, praised Microsoft's efforts to improve security in Windows Server 2003. Last month, Microsoft executives said the company spent about $200m on the security overhaul, which involved extensive review of the software code. But "it remains to be seen whether or not the code review will lead to fewer patches," Cherry warned. Many Windows Server 2003 features are turned off by default, which improves security, but "at a cost." "Applications might initially fail due to tightened security, and other applications such as Exchange will require upgrades before they will run on Windows Server 2003," said Cherry. Windows Server 2003 is better suited "to run large-scale, critical databases and applications" than earlier versions, Cherry said in a report. "This in turn will allow organisations to reduce overall cost of ownership by consolidating many smaller Windows servers onto fewer, more powerful ones running the new operating system." The downside: Companies generally would need to invest in more powerful server hardware to take advantage of Windows Server 2003's improved scalability. Better PC management, which would let administrators manage thousands of Windows 2000 or XP desktops from one central location, is another appealing Windows Server 2003 improvement. "However, to reap the benefit of reduced ongoing PC administration costs, customers will have to make a significant upfront investment to plan and implement a Windows Server 2003-based network infrastructure," Cherry noted. Early test cases
Companies that have already taken the plunge and upgraded to the new version of Windows generally praised the software's scalability and reliability. Ahead of Windows Server 2003's launch, Microsoft conducted a beta program for larger businesses interested in using the software on production systems. Chicago-based Information Resources provides sales and market research for companies selling consumer goods and pharmaceuticals. The company's 24,000 square-foot data centre handles about 122TBytes of information powered through mainframes, 115 eight-processor or greater Unix servers and 180 Windows-based servers. Information Resources is considering Windows Server 2003 in part because the company is moving away from 32-bit systems to 64-bit-based Itanium 2 servers. It is in the process of consolidating existing Unix servers onto Itanium 2 servers running the 64-bit editions of Windows Server 2003 and SQL Server 2003. Marshall Gibbs, Information Resources' chief information officer, said the company might not be as quick to switch from Unix if not for the 64-bit option. "The 32-bit environment wouldn't let me scale the models and offer the products that we need to be able to offer," he explained. "We have a 32-bit infrastructure that lets me get part-way down the path, but it's Microsoft's commitment to an enterprise-scale environment that's driving a lot of our decision making here." Gibbs said that he couldn't quantify for cost savings for two reasons: Information Resources is at the beginning of the roll out, and the company is adding capacity and power under the Windows setup versus the Unix environment. Gibbs said Information Resources' new servers running 64-bit Windows are more capable than are previous Unix systems, so "it's an apples to oranges comparison in terms of cost." The greater capacity means "the number of databases I host on a single server (increases) by 200 times and at the same time (the company can) increase the number of users on that server...ten-fold." Analog Devices also has found an important place for Windows Server 2003, even as the company focuses mainly on migrating existing servers from NT 4 to 2000. The semiconductor company used about six Windows Server 2003 systems to develop a business portal serving 8,800 employees. "The portal project was really a proof of concept for us more than anything else on Windows 2003," Forte said. New York-based JetBlue Airways could be the poster company for Windows Server 2003 and for standardisation on Microsoft software. The airline is consolidating on Unisys 32-bit and 64-bit servers, with plans to run Microsoft software across the company. JetBlue chose Windows over Linux for its computing infrastructure. "If tomorrow, I put Linux in my environment, I would have to hire server people to build, monitor, maintain and administrate those servers, and I would have to hire a development staff to develop applications under the Linux operating system," said JetBlue chief information officer Jeff Cohen. "I would need 50 percent more staff to run...operating systems" other than Windows, said Cohen. JetBlue sees the Unisys servers running Windows Server 2003 as a way of cutting costs, compared to previous setups used by the company, Cohen said. "We truly try to run a 100-percent Microsoft environment to keep the cost down, but if there are applications that we buy from vendors, whatever the required database is, that's what we run," he said.
See the Software News Section for the latest headlines on everything from peer to peer clients to Office software and beyond. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

1 hour ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

4 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

7 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

11 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

21 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint