It's evolved tremendously. Today's Ethernet bears very little resemblance to what David Boggs and I built in 1974, and it gives rise to the question, what is Ethernet exactly? I have a bunch of answers to that. It's gotten faster, it's been hubbed and switched unlike the original Ethernet. The original had packet collisions, but the latest versions have very few of those. Today's Ethernet technology is extremely diverse and has very little in common with what appeared in '74. The good news is that they still call it Ethernet, and that's my word. What did the word mean to you then?
My good fortune was to be given a problem that no one had ever had before -- how would you interconnect several computers with one at every desk? I was certainly early if not first in trying to solve that problem. We were building the first laser printer at that time. How could you connect the computers to each other and connect them to the printer and then to the early Internet, the Arpanet? Ethernet was based on packets. Data was to be delivered in packets, and the Ethernet was to be decentralised so there could be nothing in the middle that could break or be unscalable. It lay within a hierarchy of protocols, so it only had to do what it needed to do, not things that would be handled elsewhere in the protocol stack, which was a relatively new idea at the time. It was so simple, and that's one of its advantages. Another advantage was randomised retransmissions. That was based on the Aloha Network built at the University of Hawaii by Norm Abramson, a forerunner of 802.11 that had randomised retransmissions. What's a randomised retransmission?
That means transmissions would be tried again later if they overlapped in time and interfered with each other, which we called a collision. Arpanet introduced packet switching in about 1969, and the Aloha brought packet switching to radio in about 1970. So two big things happened in '73: One was the invention of the Ethernet, and the other was the beginning of the development of TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol), which started at Stanford in the summer of '73. The Internet and Ethernet have developed in lockstep since that time. Today, most Internet packets, 99.99 percent of them, are carried on the Ethernet.







Talkback
arpanet didn't introduce packet switching, the uk National Physical Laboratory did it in 1963 or thereabouts. and it didn't stay in the lab either....
When I started work in computing in 1975 at BNF Metals Technology Centre in Wantage, UK they were already contributing to Lockheed Dialog or were preparing to over the Experimental Packet Switching Service* run by the Post Office (not even yet called British Telecom? not sure) and X25 already went right round the world, over GEC switches and BT lines (or GPO?). BBN stripped down X25 to make their arpanet work, but they didn't improve it which is why there is TCPIP Version 6.
*ie the Americans weren't using TCPIP either...
Not only that, Arpanet was still military, so pretending that universities (except American ones and UCL-CS here) could use it would be disingenuous. It was donated to the world because it was inherently insecure - nowadays touted "as a virtue". Quite a lot of the world's computer development happened courtesy of Coloured Book X25 protocols and Cambridge Ring LANs. and to be less jingoistic, quite a lot also went via BITNET which I later supported in the UK and IBM's RSCS network and internal VNET.
Xerox Parc was/is a wonderful institution. Just as they deserve the credit for windows, not Microsoft, NPL deserves the credit for packet switching. True. Teddington doesn't sound as glamorous.I 'd also claim that RINGS are extremely useful if replaceable for deterministic networks - and rings were used with fibre optics for a long time when it wasn't that easy to make drivers for anything else (eg FDDI). System X/ISO Switching System Number 7, the UK's/international definitely better 32-channel not 24-channel phone system was another unsung great leap forward - it had so much flak in the press it deserves a mention in redress. When Clifford Stoll traced the KGB Internet hackers out of Berkeley it was ISO digital networks and X25 monitoring that tracked them to Hamburg, possibly not a plus, thinking of 'The Net'...
I have only ommitted JAPAN from this diatribe out of sheer ignorance - I don't know what they're up to, but I bet it's just as interesting. Garage Projects make great hype but that's not how the world works.
My father studied physics and radar at Bristol University (the original, UK, Bristol). At that time Gray Walter was messing about elsewhere in the university on what he called "tortoises". Gray Walter was an American anglophile - I expect he would have preferred his name of "tortoises" to continue instead of "turtles" as the computing community chose to name the digital era's version. If you're interested in the "turtle" concept, switch to dry land for the pre-war story...
I have a serious point - if you want to read the right early papers, you can use heavyweight technology like Google and Science Citation Index techniques or you can simply know the right name and the right story. It saves so much effort to know the right place to look in the first place for background information. ALOHA and Ethernet were great ideas and the first users of randomisation, a very pervasive concept in digital communications nowadays, but neither of them arose in a vacuum. or an all-American comms discipline.
phil overy
boring old real time programmer