Microsoft to enlarge server business with Jupiter bundle

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Microsoft is to rely on its time-tested bundling strategy, key to its successful capture of the desktop market, to help jumpstart its server software business. A new server software bundle code-named Jupiter will enter customer testing before the end of June, according to company representatives. The bundle, which includes some of the company's server products for building custom business applications, is the cornerstone to Microsoft's ambitious plans to increase its share of the fast-growing market for integration software. Microsoft's strategy binds together at least three of its server applications into a single bundle. Jupiter includes BizTalk Server integration software; Content Management Server, for storing and presenting business documents; and Commerce Server, for building e-commerce Web sites. A company could, for example, use Jupiter software to automate an insurance claim-handling process that culls data from multiple back-end systems and routes documents to several people for approval. Jupiter will be a critical weapon in Microsoft's ongoing efforts, along with its .Net Web services software, to break into the market for large-scale business systems, which is largely dominated by rivals selling Java-based products, analysts said. Web services are standards and programming methods that allow software applications to exchange data more easily. In the process, Microsoft hopes to establish -- after three years of trying -- that Web services software is tough enough to handle large-scale computing tasks. "Microsoft is counting on Web services projects to drive sales of its server products and development tools," said Rob Helm, director of research at Directions on Microsoft. "People won't do high-stakes Web services projects unless they can get the same level of security and reliability from Web services that they get from the application integration technologies they use already." The software maker hopes to make its mark with a tightly integrated and attractively priced product set, said Dave Wascha, group product manager of e-business servers at Microsoft. The company also hopes the strategy plays into buyers' demands for software that is more reliable and easier to manage. Microsoft's big advantages are having a consistent architecture, a consistent development model and software that comes out of the box, ready to go, said Ted Schadler, a Forrester Research analyst. "(Competitors from) the Java world have trouble with that." A latecomer
Still, Microsoft is coming relatively late to the $1.5bn, or about £1bn, market for integration software, which has become one of the software industry's most hotly contested arenas. A number of entrenched integration software companies are feeling increased competition from heavy-hitters such as IBM, Oracle and BEA systems. IBM leads the integration middleware category, followed by specialists WebMethods and Tibco Software, according to 2002 market share tallies from researcher Gartner Dataquest. Schadler noted that Java-based middleware companies generally offer more sophisticated software that customers use to handle complex and demanding computing jobs. "But today, people are looking for technology that's good enough, and Microsoft is riding that wave," Schadler said. "It's a happy convergence for Microsoft." Despite tight IT budgets, integration software is the fastest-growing segment in the middleware category, according to Gartner, in large part because sharing data between applications is a persistent headache for IT managers. The majority of Microsoft's Web services software sales have revolved around its Visual Studio.Net development tool. Jupiter, in combination with Visual Studio.Net, could stimulate sales for its server software, since the bundle will help link .Net applications to existing business systems. The first phase of the Jupiter strategy will introduce a revamped version of BizTalk software, which is used for transporting documents and data across company divisions or between business partners. That overhaul of BizTalk, set for completion by the end of this year, will form the foundation of Microsoft's server application bundling strategy, according to Microsoft executives. Components incorporated in the forthcoming version of BizTalk, including workflow, administration and security, will also be built into Microsoft's Commerce Server and its Content Management Server to improve the ties among the three products, executives said. The full multi-application bundle will be available in the first half of next year. The new version of BizTalk will introduce business process workflow software based on the Web Services Business Process Execution Language (WSBPEL) standard and incorporate Web services standards support for more reliable messaging and security. The revamped BizTalk will also sport a close coupling with Visual Studio.Net and the Office desktop applications, according to Microsoft. Server bundling: Round 2
Jupiter won't mark the first time that Microsoft has attempted to sell server products as a suite. In the early 1990s, Microsoft created BackOffice, a bundle of the company's SQL Server database, Exchange messaging server, application management tools and other software. But critics of the bundle said the individual applications were never tightly integrated, and few companies wanted to buy all of the BackOffice applications. Microsoft eventually dropped the BackOffice bundle in 2001. With Jupiter, Microsoft is trying bundling again, this time with a set of applications ripe for combination, said analysts. Companies often purchase separate products for integration, portals and transactions, but many business processes can be streamlined by drawing on all of these tools, said analysts. Microsoft's integration push will come as integration software specialists -- companies that only sell integration products -- struggle to survive. One-time high-flier Vitria, for example, is under pressure to regain profitability. Its stock price has hung below $1 since last year. And Gartner found that Java middleware companies, which are relative newcomers to integration, took market share away from integration software specialists last year. Despite a thinning of competitors, Microsoft has its work cut out for it. The company's bundling strategy, while specific to Windows, is hardly original. IBM, BEA, Oracle and other companies have already created "application platform suites". These Java server software bundles include a Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) application server, as well as corporate portal software and integration "brokers". Microsoft's server software also lacks a long track record, particularly for the most demanding computing jobs, such as the running of complex financial systems or high-volume transaction Web sites. By contrast, Java middleware and specialized integration software from companies, such as WebMethods and Tibco, are designed to handle high-end integration projects on multiple operating systems. An executive from one Microsoft competitor, WebMethods, asserts that Jupiter will have limited appeal to companies that have multiple operating systems and applications written with different programming models. As such, Jupiter will appeal primarily to small and medium-size business that have decided to be 100 percent Windows shops, said Scott Opitz, senior vice president of business development at WebMethods. Microsoft also has to sort out thorny packaging issues. For example, Wascha said the company has not yet decided whether to sell a standalone version of BizTalk later this year that is independent of the Jupiter release. The company also has not yet decided whether to include its Host Integration Server, which pulls data from mainframe servers, in the Jupiter bundle. Jupiter pricing, still to be determined, could be a quagmire for Microsoft as well, noted Ron Schmelzer, an analyst at market researcher ZapThink. Although it may be convenient to purchase a suite of server products, customers may balk at paying full price if they only use a subset of the features, he said. That was one drawback to Microsoft's earlier BackOffice efforts. But even before Microsoft releases the full multi-application Jupiter bundle, analysts say that the forthcoming version of BizTalk will be mature enough to give established integration players a run for their money. The company can play off the growing maturity of its Windows Server 2003 operating system and SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition database, which greatly improve the reliability of Windows-anchored, industrial-strength applications, said analysts. Playing to its strengths
One of Microsoft's biggest advantages over server software competitors is its dominance of the desktop software market, said analysts. The company is exploiting its desktop software stronghold to bolster its position in industrial-strength server software. For example, Microsoft's Visio diagramming tool will produce BPEL-compliant code from the design of a multistep business process, according to executives. Jupiter will also include so-called business activity monitoring tools, which will let someone use an Excel spreadsheet to view the progress of an ongoing business process. For example, a call centre manager could query the workflow engine to spot where incoming calls are experiencing long delays. Jupiter server software will work closely with the InfoPath forms-building capability that Microsoft is building into Office 2003, said Wascha. InfoPath lets a person create a form, defined as an XML document. By tying the form with the XML-based workflow engine in Jupiter, the person could establish the approval steps of a simple purchase-order business process, Wascha explained. The close coupling of Microsoft's desktop and server applications, combined with its traditional strengths in pricing and ease-of-use, give its renewed, albeit late, thrust into the server software market a distinctive look, according to analysts. "Microsoft is taking its core strength, which is their dominance on the desktop, and they are leveraging it with their emerging strength in the server environment," Schmelzer said. "I can't imagine anybody else who could do this but Microsoft."
See the Software News Section for the latest headlines on everything from peer to peer clients to Office software and beyond. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

22 minutes ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

8 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

10 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

10 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

11 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

12 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

13 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

13 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

13 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

14 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

14 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

15 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

15 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

15 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

18 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

19 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

19 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

21 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

22 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule