PeopleSoft shares scarce, says Oracle

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
As Oracle presses on with its hostile bid for PeopleSoft, only a "few" shares have been tendered at this point, top Oracle executive Chuck Phillips said on Friday. Phillips, an executive vice president, noted in a conference call that Oracle sees "no reason" to raise its cash offer of $19.50 (£11.70) a share, even though PeopleSoft on Friday announced that it was rejecting that bid. "(PeopleSoft's) institutional investors are supportive of the combination... the only issue for them is the price," said Phillips, who noted that Oracle has made presentations to more than half of the business software maker's shareholder base. "We asked them: 'What's the right number?' and all of them said $19 or $20 a share. So we decided to split the difference at $19.50." Oracle, which launched its hostile bid on June 6 with a cash offer of $16 a share, increased its bid to $19.50 on Wednesday. That increase came three days after Oracle began its road show with PeopleSoft investors. Phillips told CNET News.com that he didn't know the exact number of shares tendered so far, but noted that it was small. This is because "it's currently not too meaningful for most people to tender, if a major condition for the deal being closed -- the redemption of the 'poison pill' -- has not been removed." "Without that redemption, tendering is somewhat of a political vote, but not an economic event," he added. Proxy solicitors, however, say hostile buyers will frequently amass more than 50 percent of tendered shares and use that majority to pressure the target company into removing a poison pill or shareholder rights plan. Under the plan, if a prospective buyer acquires more than 20 percent or more of outstanding PeopleSoft shares, the company will issue a flood of new shares to dilute that holding. "We have not pushed (PeopleSoft's) shareholders to put pressure on management," Phillips told CNET News.com. Oracle has given the shareholders until July 7 to tender their stock, although that deadline can be extended. In the conference call, Phillips said the database maker sees no reason to increase its current bid. "We haven't made any comments on plans beyond that, at this point," he said. "There's no one to bid against. There's no 'white knight,' so there's no real reason to raise the price," he added. "There is not a lot to do here until (PeopleSoft) management wants to take the next step." Phillips, a former star software analyst at investment banking firm Morgan Stanley, raised eyebrows last month when he left that firm to join Oracle, one of the companies on which he issued investment advice. Less than a month after he assumed his position as executive vice president and top advisor to Ellison, Oracle announced its takeover bid for PeopleSoft. Phillips and Ellison conducted "industrial espionage," according to a lawsuit filed against Oracle by J.D. Edwards, a software company that PeopleSoft agreed to acquire just days before Oracle launched its own takeover bid. PeopleSoft's purchase of J.D. Edwards would make it the world's second-largest business-applications company behind SAP, nudging Oracle out of that spot. Morgan Stanley is representing J.D. Edwards in its merger with PeopleSoft, and J.D. Edwards contends that Phillips used his inside knowledge of that deal to help Oracle. Phillips called the lawsuit "ridiculous" and said there is "plenty of strong evidence" to counter J.D. Edwards' claims. Asked during the conference call if Oracle hired him specifically to help lead a major acquisition, Phillips responded that he had been given no job description when hired and was in the process of defining it when the company announced its buyout bid. "I had some initial ideas on partnerships and strategic relationships," he said, noting that he was surprised by Oracle's takeover bid. Should the takeover prove successful, Phillips said that Oracle plans to support PeopleSoft's products for "years to come" and that it won't force the California-based company's customers to convert to Oracle programs. In a statement on Friday, Ellison accused PeopleSoft executives of using "lies and scare tactics" by telling the company's customers that Oracle plans to shut down PeopleSoft's products and force users to move to Oracle applications. "We will continue to develop and improve PeopleSoft's products for at least the next ten years -- even longer, if customers require further support," Ellison said. In the conference call, Phillips said Oracle will enhance various PeopleSoft applications and extend support for them beyond their current schedule, as well as introduce more outsourcing options for them. In addition, the California-based company intends to offer free Oracle application licenses in exchange for the PeopleSoft licenses that it replaces. "We wouldn't be offering to pay $6.3bn in cold, hard cash for these customers if we didn't want to keep them," Phillips said. Oracle has recently sought to soften initial comments by Ellison that he had no intention of maintaining or selling PeopleSoft's applications, which compete head-to-head with Oracle's. Some of PeopleSoft's 5,100 customers were wary of that earlier stance, because migrating to an entirely different set of business applications can be a time-consuming and costly undertaking. Despite the pledge of support for PeopleSoft products, Phillips acknowledged that Oracle's long-term strategy is to entice the acquired customer base into swapping that technology for its own. He added that several information technology companies have already had discussions with Oracle about gearing up services and tools for migration projects, which would not be provided for free. Noting that consulting fees for such projects can cost customers several times the price of the software itself, Phillips said Oracle intends to make the effort involved in migrating from PeopleSoft to Oracle applications not unlike upgrading from one major PeopleSoft release to the next. But Phillips sees a battle brewing for the hearts and minds -- not to mention wallets -- of PeopleSoft customers, should Oracle seal the deal. "The question is: How much do we get of (the PeopleSoft migration business) versus SAP and Microsoft?"
For a round-up of the latest tech business coverage, see the Business News Section. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

58 minutes ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

6 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

15 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

23 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material