Microsoft anti-spam campaign 'hypocritical'

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Microsoft recently launched a high-profile campaign against spammers, but some critics say the company should be more introspective if it is serious about reducing the scourge of unwanted email. The software maker and some of its competitors that provide Internet service and Web-based email are outdoing one another with highly publicised anti-spam campaigns. These have ranged from lawsuits to technology and policy initiatives. In the most recent example, Microsoft chairman Bill Gates sent a letter to customers on Tuesday in which he explained some steps his company is taking to reduce spam. The letter came a day after The Wall Street Journal published an anti-spam column penned by Gates. But some companies and organisations working to curb spam accuse Microsoft of grandstanding, saying that the company has demonstrated a preference for splashy press events over difficult technology fixes or product sacrifices. These critics have seized on the company's own statements that it is focusing on reducing the amount of spam its users receive, rather than the spam its users and servers send. "Microsoft is behind the times," said Laura Atkins, president of the SpamCon Foundation. "In general it's nice to see them finally catching up with everyone else -- and they are working hard to rein in abuse -- but they have to work a lot harder," Atkins said. "Microsoft has its own spam problem." Microsoft, however, rejects those contentions, citing recent projects and the long-term nature of any effective solution. "Spam is a central issue for our customers and we are taking a multifaceted approach to address the problem," a Microsoft representative said. "We did not get here overnight. It will take time to see the impact of the efforts we are making across technology, legislation, enforcement and self-regulation." In February, Microsoft announced a series of lawsuits against spammers. In March, it imposed a 100-message cap on users of its free Hotmail email service (the restriction does not apply to paid Hotmail accounts). In May, Microsoft unveiled more anti-spam features for Hotmail and its MSN online service and submitted to the US Senate written testimony by Gates urging legal spam restrictions. And last week the company called an international press conference to publicise more suits against spammers. Critics: Spam traced to Microsoft servers
But even such a busy anti-spam schedule has failed to convince Microsoft's critics that it is doing enough to help stem the spam tide. Deficiencies in Microsoft's spam behaviour range across a number of its divisions that offer email services, according to Atkins and others. These include the company's small-business-oriented bCentral portal; MSN, which has its own email service; and Hotmail, a separate, Web-based email service that uses many of the same systems as MSN but operates under different rules. Perhaps the loudest hue and cry against Microsoft emanates from some network administrators tracking the spam problem, who claim that a sizable chunk of the spam now clogging the Internet's arteries emanates from Microsoft's own servers. These spam watchers complain that while Microsoft has implemented badly needed controls on Hotmail, such as technology designed to identify software robots and prevent them from registering for accounts, it has left loopholes large enough to run rivers of spam through the related MSN email service. "Hotmail has the combination of daily limits and having to prove you're human, which makes it not useful for sending spam," said John Levine, author of several computer technology books and a board member of the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email. "MSN has neither of those, so we're seeing a lot of spam." MSN email is available for a free two-month trial. As a result, Levine said, someone could use a purloined credit card number to open the account, send torrents of spam, and then cancel the account before the credit card is charged and subsequently determined to be stolen. That process could be repeated several times a day by a single person, he said. Levine and others further isolate the MSN spam problem to a protocol that Microsoft uses to integrate its various email services and email management applications, including Outlook. Called WebDAV, the protocol lets people write their own interfaces to an email system, and it is through this protocol that Levine believes spammers are jacking up MSN's spam output. Methods of using WebDAV to send email through Hotmail's servers -- but without going through the Web site or Outlook -- are well documented online. "With the right tools, a smart network engineer would be able to see that almost all of the email coming from the Hotmail/MSN servers that are used for WebDAV is spam," wrote one spam expert who requested anonymity. "We have seen direct evidence of this." Worse, WebDAV critics say, the protocol makes it easy for spammers to alter their return addresses and other header information -- a chronic headache for network administrators trying to identify spam and its origins. "If you have a Hotmail or MSN account, when you set up your account in Outlook Express, you can set it up with any return address you want, and the Hotmail/MSN mail servers cheerfully send mail with any old return address you want," Levine said. "Hence the problem." Microsoft: We're working on it
However, MSN has its own outbound email limit, said Larry Grothaus, MSN's lead product manager, declining to disclose any details. He also contended that the credit card registration safeguarded MSN email against unauthenticated abuse, and that the credit card system prevented serial registrations under the same card. "We agree that it's a very large issue for the entire industry, so we're doing what we can on both the incoming and outgoing basis to help customers," Grothaus said. While not disputing the technical details of critics' WebDAV complaints, he called the notion that most of MSN's outbound DAV email was spam "absolutely incorrect... a very far stretch." The degree to which Microsoft is working on the outbound spam issue remains a matter of debate. In a 29 May interview published on the company's Web site, the general manager of Microsoft's antispam technology and strategy group, Ryan Hamlin, said the company had prioritised incoming spam over outbound spam. "Outbound is something we're looking at," Hamlin said. "We've had conversations both in Hotmail and MSN, and I would say that it's not something that probably in the next couple of months you'll see us be super-aggressive about, because we feel like solving the inbound problem is a much greater issue right now than solving the outbound problem." The amount of incoming Hotmail spam dwarfed the amount of outbound Hotmail spam by about 10-to-1, Hamlin said. "So we're going after the big fish first and solving the inbound problem and then absolutely we'll turn and start to address the outbound issue," he said. That philosophy doesn't sit well with the SpamCon Foundation, which accuses Microsoft of failing to regulate spam sent by its own customers. "BCentral.com sends a lot of mail that is not necessarily solicited, and often they continue to send it even after you've told them to stop," Atkins said. "The problem is that bCentral has a number of customers who send mail through them, but Microsoft doesn't police them at all. They don't take action against their customers." Microsoft-owned bCentral sells software and services such as email to small businesses. A representative declined to comment on the issue of spam from the service. While network administrators complain about the volume of spam originating with Microsoft servers, at least one email provider sounded a sympathetic note. "We continually have to improve what we are doing on our side as well," said Josh Mailman, vice president of marketing for Everyone.net, which hosts free sponsored mail for 35,000 domains. "People will try to exploit free Web mail even to the extent of hiring people to go through a human interface test -- which we all have -- and then send spam out one by one. Think of spam sweat shops," Mailman said. "Providers like Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL and us have to continually improve and be vigilant to the threat and work to keep email clean."
For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

2 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

11 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

19 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

21 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

21 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

23 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material