California juggles anti-spam bills

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
A key committee on Tuesday voted to send one spam bill to the floor of the California assembly and left a competing bill to die in what one senator called a victory for Microsoft. The bills have wound their way through the California legislature as lawmakers nationwide come under increasing pressure to criminalise the sending of unsolicited commercial email. Efforts to pass tough anti-spam laws abound at the state level, and the US Congress is also considering a number of bills. The assembly's Business and Professions Committee unanimously approved Senate Bill 186, sponsored by Kevin Murray, of Los Angeles, and killed Senate Bill 12, sponsored by Debra Bowen. The competing bills, each of which passed the Senate by 2-1 margins, would revise Bowen's anti-spam bill of 1998, which mandated that unsolicited commercial email be labelled as such in the subject line of the message. Bowen now acknowledges that approach failed. While both bills would fine spammers, Bowen warned that late amendments to Murray's bill would force spam recipients to prove "actual damages," while hers would assign fines of $500 per unsolicited email. Bowen's bill may be reconsidered by the committee in the next few weeks. Murray's office said that the final version of his bill headed for the assembly would conform with the legislative summary that committee members read before their vote Tuesday. According to that summary, the bill lets plaintiffs "recover, in addition to actual damages, liquidated damages of $1,000 per unsolicited commercial email, or $1,000,000 per incident, whichever is less." A representative for Murray said SB 186 would be more effective than Bowen's bill because it targeted the vendors who hired spammers to send bulk email on their behalf. Bowen countered that her bill targeted both vendors and spammers. After watching her bill stall in committee on Tuesday, Bowen went on the offensive against what she said was the real culprit in the bill's defeat: Microsoft. "Trusting Microsoft to protect computer users from spam is like putting telemarketers in charge of the do-not-call list," Bowen said in a statement. "Microsoft uses a megaphone to tell everyone how much it hates spam at the same time it's working overtime to kill truly tough anti-spam laws. Why? Microsoft doesn't want to ban spam; it wants to decide what's 'legitimate' or 'acceptable' unsolicited commercial advertising so it can turn around and license those email messages and charge those advertisers a fee to wheel their spam into your email in-box without your permission." A Microsoft spokesman said he thought Bowen was referring to language in Murray's bill that exempted Internet service providers such as Microsoft from prosecution for spam they delivered but did not originally send. He called her accusations "patently false." "It is not our intent to try to use the protection we have as an ISP (Internet service provider) for not being held liable for passing messages through our system," Microsoft spokesman Sean Sundwall said. "In Murray's bill, ISPs are not shot for being the messenger. So what she's hinting at there is that now that we have that protection, it can pass through to us even if we send the spam. But that's not going to happen, and we will use every resource we have to make sure that is resolved in future iterations of the bill." One legal expert who studies spam law said that section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act would protect ISPs regardless of what state law said about ISPs' liability for delivering spam. "It's true that SB186 makes ISPs immune if all they do is deliver the spam, but that too is probably unavoidable under federal law," David Sorkin, an associate professor of law at the John Marshall Law School, wrote in an email exchange. "Anyway, it seems to me to make a good deal of sense. ISPs bear some responsibility, but they're not the source of the problem, and people can always switch ISPs if there are a few bad apples." Sorkin applauded the repeal of California's existing spam statute, but voiced doubts on the value of state spam laws. "If a law merely sets guidelines for spamming by requiring labels, prohibiting fraud, etc. -- as is the case with existing California law (and most other places within the US) -- all it accomplishes is to legitimise spam, making the spam problem worse. I generally would support legislation that prohibits unsolicited commercial email (or preferably, unsolicited bulk email), though I have serious doubts about trying to accomplish this at the state level." A vote by the assembly on SB 186 could come as early as this month, but wrangling over California's budget crisis could derail its progress, Murray's office acknowledged. Whatever the voting schedule, Bowen predicted choppy waters for Murray's bill once the content of the amendments becomes clear to California legislators. "I believe you'll see opposition begin to come out when people see what went into this bill this morning," Bowen said in an interview Tuesday. "There are 15 amendments, and this spam story is not written yet."
For all security-related news, including updates on the latest viruses, hacking exploits and patches, check out ZDNet UK's Security News Section. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

2 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

11 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

19 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

21 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

21 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

23 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material