PeopleSoft can buy J.D. Edwards

By Alorie Gilbert and Dawn Kawamoto, CNET News, 15 July, 2003 07:39

NEWS

Federal regulators said on Monday that the pending merger of PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards is not anticompetitive, clearing the way for the friendly $1.7bn (£1.05bn) deal and frustrating Oracle's desire to acquire PeopleSoft in a separate, hostile takeover bid. Oracle, in response to the US Department of Justice decision, announced it will still proceed with its hostile bid for PeopleSoft and will extend its deadline for PeopleSoft investors to tender their shares. PeopleSoft shareholders will now have until 15 August to tender their shares, rather than this Friday. Antitrust experts said the decision by the US Department of Justice comes as no surprise, given that the companies serve two markets -- the high-end and middle market -- and that the products of the two companies don't, for the most part, directly compete. PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards plan to push forward on closing their deal within the next few days. PeopleSoft's tender offer for J.D. Edwards shares ends on Thursday at midnight. "The Department of Justice's decision to grant early termination is great news," PeopleSoft chief executive Craig Conway said. "This is a very important milestone and clears the way for the J.D. Edwards acquisition to be completed." J.D. Edwards was equally pleased. "Together, PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards will set a new standard in serving the needs of enterprise application software customers," J.D. Edwards chief executive Bob Dutkowsky said. "The combined company will offer both midsize and large enterprise customers access to the broadest, most open suite of integrated enterprise software applications in the industry." Oracle's announcement that it still plans to move forward with its hostile $6.3bn cash bid for PeopleSoft resolves lingering questions about whether the software giant would still pursue PeopleSoft if it closed its deal with J.D. Edwards. Oracle launched its hostile bid for PeopleSoft a few days after PeopleSoft announced plans to acquire J.D. Edwards last month. "We are extending our offer for PeopleSoft, and we remain fully committed to acquiring PeopleSoft, with or without J.D. Edwards," Oracle spokesman Jim Finn said. Oracle has extended its deadline two times. Earlier this month, Oracle extended its deadline from 7 July to 18 July. And at the time, PeopleSoft investors had tendered 34.7 million shares, or less than 11 percent, to Oracle. But in the interim, more PeopleSoft investors have tendered their stock, giving Oracle 43.8 million shares, or roughly 14 percent of its rival's outstanding shares. Oracle needs more than 50 percent of PeopleSoft's shares tendered to demonstrate it has the support of its rival's investor base to do the deal. Probing for Oracle's thinking on J.D. Edwards at last week's meeting, financial analysts asked executives if Oracle could possibly prevent the deal, or whether it had considered spinning J.D. Edwards off were it to end up with PeopleSoft. Oracle has "a number of options," Safra Catz, executive vice president, said at that time. Oracle faces its own federal antitrust investigation in its bid for PeopleSoft, with the Justice Department making a second request for information from Oracle last week. That review, which is likely to take several months, could get tougher for Oracle if it has to defend the merits of a three-way merger. For Oracle, any Justice Department challenge to its bid could kill the deal. Companies frequently abandon acquisition plans if the Justice Department holds up a deal, rather than go through a lengthy court battle. Acquirers usually avoid a drawn-out court battle because of the lingering uncertainty it creates for both companies. Attorneys general from approximately 30 states have ramped up their review of Oracle's hostile bid for PeopleSoft, signing confidentiality agreements that will enable them to share information among themselves and other federal agencies. "This decision shows that the Department of Justice is looking carefully at the merits of these transactions," said Howard Morse, a former senior official with the Federal Trade Commission's high-tech antitrust division and now a partner with the law firm Drinker Biddle & Reath in Washington, D.C. "Those people who argued this transaction would get a second request, just because the proposed Oracle acquisition of PeopleSoft received a second request, missed the fact that the government does a careful analysis of each deal and on a market-by-market basis." If the merger of PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards goes through, federal antitrust regulators are likely to have three companies to review under the Oracle bid, rather than two. But Morse noted this will not delay the Justice Department's decision in the Oracle bid, because federal regulators must abide by strict deadlines in making their decision. Once Oracle submits the requested documents and materials to the DOJ, the federal antitrust agency will have 10 days to inform the software company whether it will challenge its merger proposal or let it go through. Oracle, however, has the option of giving the Justice Department an extension should the regulators need more time. Shares of all three companies were up during late morning trading. PeopleSoft gained 13 cents, or about 0.73 percent, to $17.97, while J.D. Edwards climbed 21 cents, or about 1.44 percent, to $14.75. Oracle, meanwhile, rose 9 cents, or about 0.70 percent, to $12.93.

For a round-up of the latest tech business coverage, see the Business News Section. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

ZDNet UK Live

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

4 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

13 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

21 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

23 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

23 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

PeopleSoft can buy J.D. Edwards

Daily Newsletters

Topics

Related stories

Rival bidders for PeopleSoft unlikely

US states home in on Oracle bid

Heart of England NHS begins massive digitisation plan

Hard-drive woes hit PC shipments in fourth quarter

Post your comment

ZDNet UK Live

Latest in IT Strategy

Heart of England NHS begins massive digitisation plan

Hard-drive woes hit PC shipments in fourth quarter

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

PHP Web Developer - html, css, javascript

Java Developer, Online Gaming, London

Quant Dev, Hedge Fund, FX, Excel VBA

Inside ZDNet UK

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

2012 Predictions: VCE FastPath, VI SAN Probe & Hadoop

BlackBerry Bold 9790

Make faster, smarter decisions using BI

Ten factors that make Ubuntu 11.10 a hit

Toshiba Portégé Z830-10P Review

BT's archive: Pictures from the vault

News & Analysis

Reviews

Blogs

Resources

About Us

Member Services

Special Features

Advertising Features

ZDNet UK / News and Analysis / Business of IT / IT Strategy

PeopleSoft can buy J.D. Edwards

Daily Newsletters

Topics

Related stories

Post your comment

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Latest in IT Strategy

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

Inside ZDNet UK

Resources

About Us

Member Services

Special Features

Advertising Features