PeopleSoft hits merger target

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
PeopleSoft on Friday announced that investors have tendered 88 percent of J.D. Edwards shares, delaying the closure of the $1.8bn (£1.13bn) merger as J.D. Edwards shareholders must now vote on the deal. As PeopleSoft marks this milestone in its effort to expand its reach in midmarket business applications and the manufacturing sector, the maker of high-end business software will find that its work has just begun. The soon-to-be combined company -- which would be the second-largest enterprise applications company in the world -- will need to execute on several fronts, from integrating business operations and melding corporate cultures to retaining and growing its customer base. And in the meantime, it must prove to shareholders that its merger is a better investment than Oracle's hostile $6.3bn takeover bid for PeopleSoft. For Oracle, the challenge in acquiring PeopleSoft is likely to become tougher. PeopleSoft may want to avoid a repeat of its last large acquisition, in which it took several years from the time of the 1999 purchase to efficiently integrate customer relationship management specialist Vantive. The integration with J.D. Edwards is already moving forward, according to PeopleSoft's president and chief executive, Craig Conway. Under the merger, J.D. Edwards will operate as a wholly owned subsidiary of PeopleSoft. "We will have product lines that will continue in the marketplace (after the merger)," Conway said during a conference call with analysts on Thursday. One will be the AS/400 business, another will cater to the midmarket and a third will handle large enterprise customers. Conway added that PeopleSoft plans to meet with analysts again next month, in which time it will go into greater detail on the integration plans. Sizing up the cultural fit between the two companies, Bob Dutkowsky, J.D. Edwards' chief executive, said in an interview with CNET News.com earlier this month: "Our cultures complement each other and our architectures complement each other." Dutkowsky added that there is little overlap between the two companies, creating a nice fit between the operations. PeopleSoft serves the services industries and large enterprise customers, while J.D. Edwards caters to the manufacturing, distribution and asset-intensive industries. But at least one analyst sees a greater challenge in bringing the two companies together. "There's a lot of duplication in functionality, so it will be interesting to see how all the integration issues work out," Ted Kempf, a Gartner analyst, said in an earlier interview. PeopleSoft on Friday reiterated that it expects the J.D. Edwards merger will add significantly to its 2004 earnings, excluding amortisation and other items. Also, the company anticipates cutting operating expenses by $80m annually for the combined company within its first full year of operation. The tender offer for J.D. Edwards shares closed at midnight Thursday. J.D. Edwards investors received an exchange rate of $14.74 for every share they turned into PeopleSoft shares. Those who did not tender their shares will receive $7.05 in cash plus 0.43 of a PeopleSoft common share for each J.D. Edwards share. PeopleSoft ended the trading day Thursday at $17.90. The company expects to acquire the remaining shares of J.D. Edwards before the end of August. The Oracle factor
But Oracle's hostile bid may serve as a distraction from those plans. "PeopleSoft has a very difficult challenge. They have to run their business, they have to think about the integration plan, and they have to fend off Oracle's hostile bid. They have an even more difficult challenge than we do," Dutkowsky said. He noted, however, that he remains optimistic Conway will succeed in integrating the companies. Not only will PeopleSoft need to keep the customers of the combined company happy, but also the investors. Unhappy investors will likely be particularly sensitive to Oracle's buyout offer of $19.50 a share. "PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards were able to get their transaction completed. But at the end of the day, if the stock isn't near $19.50 a share in six months, there will be some stockholders who aren't going to be happy about things," said Cameron Steele, an analyst with RBC Capital Markets. J.D. Edwards investors stand to make a quick gain on their investment, should Oracle succeed in its hostile takeover attempt of PeopleSoft and they tender their shares to the database company. If they tender their shares to Oracle by its 15 August deadline, they would receive $19.50 a share if the hostile merger goes through. "We're in the process of evaluating that at this time. It all comes down to how strongly we feel PeopleSoft can successfully execute on integrating the companies and whether the synergies they hope to accomplish are realistic," said one large institutional investor for J.D. Edwards. PeopleSoft's merger with J.D. Edwards also creates several new issues for Oracle's hostile bid. But Oracle still plans to move forward with its efforts. "We believe time is on our side. Oracle remains committed to acquiring PeopleSoft -- even with the addition of J.D. Edwards," said Jim Finn, an Oracle spokesman. Based on its current offer of $19.50 a share, Oracle would have to pay an additional $1bn to acquire PeopleSoft after its J.D. Edwards merger, according to Tad Piper, a senior analyst for Piper Jaffray. That figure is based on the additional 52.6 million shares that would result from the PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards merger. But Piper noted Oracle has access to a combined $11.5bn in cash and credit, enough to easily pay for a newly merged PeopleSoft. "They are staying at $19.50. I don't see that changing until the antitrust debate (for Oracle's bid) is resolved," Piper said. The US Department of Justice and attorneys general from approximately 30 states are reviewing Oracle's buyout offer of PeopleSoft. Meanwhile, Oracle has remained quiet on any plans it may have for J.D. Edwards, if it acquires the combined company. But some analysts and sources familiar with the companies said a spinoff of all or part of J.D. Edwards' business may be on the list. "It's a lot less attractive to Oracle to buy J.D. Edwards, because a large percentage of the J.D. Edwards customer base is on IBM technology. The ability to up-sell in the J.D. Edwards customer base is less so than in the PeopleSoft customer base," Piper said. If its bid succeeds, Oracle may cut loose J.D. Edwards' AS/400 business from the rest of its operations and sell it to SSA Global Technologies and Baan, which are merging, said a source familiar with J.D. Edwards. "It would be a clean cut to spin off that business and sell it to SSA and Baan, which are in that business," the source said. "Do I think Oracle would sell it to their competitor? No. But I do think they will use it as a carrot to say they could if they have antitrust issues with the DOJ and attorneys general."
For a round-up of the latest tech business coverage, see the Business News Section. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

5 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

13 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

15 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

16 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

18 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

19 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

20 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

21 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

21 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

22 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

24 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint