Networks evade VeriSign's SiteFinder

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
As legal and political challenges to VeriSign's SiteFinder domain-name redirector mount, Chinese and other overseas network operators have taken technical steps to bypass the controversial service.

Last Friday, VeriSign bowed to public outcry and temporarily pulled the plug on SiteFinder, which redirected Internet traffic to nonexistent .com and .net domain names to the company's own advertising site. Even before that step was taken, network administrators had disabled SiteFinder for about 9 percent of all Internet users, according to a new study released on Monday by Harvard University's Berkman Center for the Internet and Society.

The study used data gathered by Alexa, which makes a browser plug-in that tracks total visits to Web sites, to evaluate which networks had disabled SiteFinder to restore normal service. About half of the blocking comes from China, with most of the rest originating in nations such as Greece, Korea and Russia, the study found.

"Some ISPs (Internet service providers) did block SiteFinder," said Ben Edelman, the principal author of the report and a student fellow at the Berkman Centre. "Outside of the United States, it seems to be particularly common. These folks seem to be unhappy with what VeriSign has been doing."

Edelman said, however, that American companies were not very aggressive in blocking SiteFinder. "I don't have a US ISP that was blocking and is currently blocking SiteFinder," Edelman said. "I don't have any other US ISPs on the list, which could either be an error -- though I don't think so -- or big US ISPs were not interested in blocking the service. It was a little bit of a surprise to us at the very least."

A VeriSign spokesman said on Monday that he needed more time to review the study. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann), the group that oversees the Internet's domain name system and successfully prodded VeriSign to suspend SiteFinder, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In an unprecedented move, Icann's security and stability advisory committee is holding an emergency meeting on Tuesday in Washington, D.C., to discuss SiteFinder.

According to the data supplied by Alexa and analysed by Edelman and Harvard faculty member Jonathan Zittrain, the overall traffic ranking of VeriSign.com jumped from rank 1,559 to rank 19 on the first day of SiteFinder's launch, and the site now garners 37 million daily visitors, up tenfold from before SiteFinder's introduction. It also shows that MSN's traffic dipped from 237 million to 218 million visitors per day after SiteFinder's launch -- reflecting less use of Internet Explorer's own domain-name-not-found redirection feature.

VeriSign's new policy is intended to generate more advertising revenue from additional visitors to its network of Web sites. But the change has had the side effect of rewiring a portion of the Internet that software designers always had expected to behave a certain way, snarling anti-spam mechanisms that check to see if the sender's domain exists, complicating the analysis of network problems, and possibly even polluting search engine results.

In an unusual grassroots movement, some network administrators have adopted technical countermeasures against VeriSign. A typical one has been to install a modified version of BIND, the standard utility used for Internet domain-name lookups.

Talkback

Verisign's responsibility could be compared to a telephone company's. If my customer attempts to call me but misdials by one digit, they either get the wrong party or they get a recording that tells them that this number is not connected and that's all they should get.

How fair would it be if the telephone company answered that misdialed phone call (which was intended for me) and asked the caller if they would rather go to one of my competitors? That is what Verisign tried to do and that's not right.

By implementing sitefinder, domain registrants would be forced to buy all possible misspelled versions of their domain so as not to send business to competitors.

Here's an example. Someone wants to look at Electronics and types in "BestBy.com". Instead of getting an error, they now get a page that contains links to other electronics suppliers. Why would I want that as a registrant? It's not right.

via Facebook 7 October, 2003 15:42
Reply

verisign does not own the internet, how dare they hijack it & force us to use their website, what else are they hiding when they do this? why do they ignore the end-user's who want things as they were before verisn got greedy & autocratic?

via Facebook 16 October, 2003 10:44
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

3 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

4 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

6 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

8 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

9 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

9 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

9 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

11 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

12 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

18 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

20 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

20 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

22 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

22 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

23 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

24 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

24 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?