As a professional Microsoft watcher, I spend a fair amount of time wondering what Bill Gates & Co. should do next. Most of the time, I use this column to poke, prod, and cajole Redmond into doing what I think is best for ZDNet readers specifically and consumers generally.
I also try to think about what's best for Microsoft as a company, because accomplishing my user-friendly goals often requires huge infusions of cash.
Today, I'm going to mix what Microsoft should do for the good of you and me with what the company needs to do in its own best interest. The result is my list of Microsoft's Top 10 Challenges for 2004.
My list is informed by another one compiled each year by my friends at the Directions on Microsoft newsletter. Their list has a deeply business-y feel to it, not surprising for a group whose primary audiences are Microsoft's biggest customers and companies that sell stuff to Microsoft. And neither list offers solutions, only challenges, although I do recommend some specific actions and non-actions.
Here goes:
- 1. The most important thing for Microsoft to do in 2004 is to resist the temptation to do a major upgrade to Windows XP. The company might like to give users a taste of what's in store for them when Longhorn finally ships (in 2005 or 2006). But the last time the company tried something like this was when Windows XP had slipped past its original target date. In response, Microsoft unleashed Windows Me, an OS that really wasn't ready, on an unsuspecting world. I hope Redmond has learned from that disaster. (Hint: This will also be at the top of the 2005 list as well.)
- 2. Microsoft needs to ship a Longhorn beta that is stable enough for corporate customers to use for development sometime in 2004. Most of what is new in Longhorn is developer-oriented, and will take a while to filter down to users. The sooner developers can start working, the better.
- 3. Linux is a competitive threat and Microsoft must respond aggressively if it wants to contain more serious competition in the future. This situation is good for customers because a frightened Microsoft has, in the past, been an innovative Microsoft. It also keeps prices customer-friendly. However, a frightened Microsoft has also been later accused of illegalities. So in 2004, Microsoft's priority must be to tear down Linux without winding up back in federal court.
- 4. A big issue we haven't heard so much about lately is digital rights management, or DRM. Microsoft needs to do a better job of educating customers, lawmakers, and the public on what DRM means in the workplace. Redmond also needs to articulate a position on fair rights issues in entertainment and electronic media. What should consumers be able to do with the content they purchase? Microsoft has the opportunity to make things better for consumers or worse, but seems to be doing nothing.
- 5. Microsoft must do more for small businesses, which have every reason to feel like the stepchildren of the big enterprise customers. Microsoft could take a lesson from Intuit: the QuickBooks people really know what it means to be close to their customers. One of the things Microsoft needs to do for small businesses is make it easier for them to license its products at reasonable terms and prices.







Talkback
Uh....
How about making a browser that actually knows what CSS2 is? The CSS2 standards have been out for what, 5 years?
And still IE destroys standards-compliant websites that render beautifully in Moz and Opera.
Ever since the convicted monopolist forced IE on everyone, they've decided to ignore it.
After all, why improve something if it's at the top?
IE is a good example of what they'll do to everything else once they take it to a monopolised position. No point working on it anymore...
A cut down 'lite' version of Office 2003 that us simple home users can actually afford? We dont need all the bells and whistles that are provided for corporate use, so how about it microsoft??
you can expect some good gifts from M$ ...
Server admins are bugged with browser / media player security issues .... The first priory for M$ shuld be, to get devided itself into OS company and App company.
They have hire some truth telling PR agency insted of truth bending PR.
They have to drive software industry with truly revelutionary liciencing and selling models for software.
How dare you are to say, that we need to buy one more operating system to come out off the security problems?
Liciencing alone is not going to work.
Are you doing any part time job for M$?
Since ms are now trying buying laws...
Like european software patents. Software patents would quickly render linux illegal, so MS mightn't end up in court, because they are trying to OWN the courts like good little neofascists. D'oh!
Microsoft: Litigation, not innovation.
But illegal doesn't mean a european will stop using linux. It just means we will stop obeying our government, if they start serving american corporate interests instead of our own.
Your comment:
"... tear down Linux."
How about just doing a better job; like building a better operating system.
Tearing down Linux leaves Microsoft with the opportunity to continue to sell buggy, crash-prone and insecure operating systems. And charge higher prices.
"tear down linux"
How about just learning to play nicely with the other kids in the playground?
Are you implying that it is quite necessary for Microsoft to have an absolute monopoly in order to survive? That their survival is dependent on eliminating open source software as a competitive element? If so, that says a lot about your confidence in the products they have created.
I would recommend that they concentrate fully on fixing up the gaping holes in a terribly insecure OS model. Just try plugging a brand new out-of-the-box Windows XP install into a broadband connection and try to apply the critical patches from Windows Update without a 3rd party firewall...poisoned in 0-60 seconds. Impressive!