Making software fun again

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

COMMENT
I've always thought Application Service Providers (ASPs) were a cool idea. It makes intuitive sense that business applications could be made available online at low cost for the enterprise as well as consumers. A standard Web browser means no painful client software to load and deploy, and standard network protocols make application delivery a breeze. The economies of scale allow ASPs to offer cheap Linux servers that can support millions of customers at a fraction of the cost of old-school client-server applications. Why wrestle with some monstrous SAP or Siebel deployment when you can sign up for a hosted service, get your users to pop open their browsers, and then get right down to it at a fraction of the cost, in a fraction of the time?

A bunch of start-ups got cash on this premise during the dot-com boom -- and promptly went bust when the bubble burst. Research firm WebMergers reported that six ASPs shut down in 2000, and 14 more in the first six months of 2001. Yet now the ASPs are back, and some are even risking the public markets. Both Salesforce.com and Right Now Technologies offer hosted application solutions and have announced IPO plans. I also recently met with NetSuite, which is funded by Oracle's Larry Ellison, as well as smaller VC-backed ASP called Talisma ASP, and both seem to have their tails in the air. Their confidence is particularly amusing as they are all offering services in the broad arena associated with another troubled acronym: CRM (customer resource management). CRM software had a brutal ride on the hype-o-coaster, culminating in a couple of damning scare reports two years ago: one from Gartner, claiming that more than half of all CRM projects failed to meet expectations, and a Merrill Lynch survey saying that nearly half of CIOs at large companies were dissatisfied with their CRM software. Yet businesses still have customers, and they still have to manage their relationships with them, and many are choosing the ASP approach as an alternative to traditional licensed client-server applications.

The big, old-school business applications vendors have figured it out as well. PeopleSoft was already there. SAP has announced ambitious plans to migrate to a thin-client ASP mode, and Oracle is offering a Web application server and dubbed its application suite 11i -- as in i for Internet. RightNow Technologies, based in Bozeman, Montana, is probably the largest ASP in revenues after big dog Salesforce.com. In its S1 it claims 1,000 active clients, and at the end of 2003 it reported revenues of about $35m – after an impressive run of 25 consecutive quarters of sequential revenue growth. (Salesforce.com claims 9,800 customers and at the end of 2003 reported revenues of about $51m.)

RightNow offers an integrated knowledge base of all the customer interactions to lower the overall cost of support. Right Now's executive VP of worldwide field operations, Peter Dunning, is an elegant and credible pitch man. As a former SAP and Oracle applications executive, he's poacher turned gamekeeper when it comes to comparing the ASP approach to the more established application architectures of vendors like, say, SAP and Oracle. He claims Oracle is never likely to get real traction in this space because the company's best and brightest are focused on the engineering task of providing a great database, not the softer skills needed when dealing with end-users. And it's not hard to argue that SAP may trouble shrinking its huge apps down to the needs of smaller and medium-sized business.

He's obviously pleased to be working for a company with customers who actually like the products, and I took this as more than just the usual vendor hyperbole, because there is something liberating and fun about Web-based applications.

I really wouldn't underestimate the fun factor in all this. Talisma, an ASP based in Bellevue, Washington, in the US, and funded by VC's Oak Investment Partners, is a minnow by comparison to the SAPs of the world, but has been through the same Damascene-Net conversion from client server to shiny new thin-client ASP architecture. Its CEO, Dan Vetras, came from another ASP vendor, Captura, which had already got the Net religion, and is clearly relieved that Talisma has now been Webified and made the shift to a three-tier architecture.

Talisma provides a suite of applications for managing customer contacts, with a special emphasis on the use of instant messaging for customer support. I was struck by his description of the way the PlayStation generation has taken to this technology, answering customer emails while conducting three simultaneous customer chat sessions (and no doubt simultaneously texting ther m8s while scoring some mp3s online). I think he's probably right when he suggests that the generation leaving American colleges now, weaned on IM and now embracing text messaging, will be even more comfortable with chatting to customers this way.

Over time I've hooked up to a whole load of consumer hosted-services: Plaxo, Orkut, Gmail. Logging onto an introductory demo from a Salesforce.com or RightNow isn't very different and doesn't take much longer. Not every organisation wants to outsource hosting of their critical applications, but I think more and more organisations are going to build client applications this way, irrespective of whether the server is in or outside the firewall. Long term, the ASP approach gives scary corporate apps the familiar simplicity and instant gratification of doing search with Google or buying a book on Amazon. I think the industry is finally beginning to figure out ways to provide grown-up enterprise applications with the same gotta-go simplicity and ease of use. Why shouldn't business software be more fun to use?

Talkback

I think the reason that web based alternatives to client based front-ends such as SAP's look good, is because SAP's front end is so awful (counter-intuitive, not conforming to Windows standards, etc).

I'll take a *good* client based front end over a web front end anyday. Would you rather use hotmail or OWA (web based) or Outlook for your email?

Client based front ends can do a lot more than web based ones. Why have a powerful PC on your desktop and use it like a dumb terminal with graphics?

Web-based solutions have their place, but as soon as someone delivers an ERP or CRM solution with a good client based front end, they won't look nearly so attractive.

via Facebook 17 June, 2004 09:40
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

UnderINK

I agree with the previous commenter wholeheartedly. I couldn't say it better myself. This is very 'Big Brother'. And while I agree with protecting...

3 hours ago by UnderINK on European e-identity plan to be unveiled this month
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Nice to see that Turing's idea of a general purpose computer doing once-hardware-powered tasks in software is now universal ;-) Mary

8 hours ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Software with everything
Jason Burchell

seriously now. I've only bothered to read a small bit of the comments. do me and the rest of the world a favour. stop saying it does not work or...

12 hours ago by Jason Burchell via Facebook on Music industry negotiating over 24-bit downloads
Philip Charles Cohen

Read about it and weep, John Donahoe ... In addition to Visa’s V.me, there is now MasterCard’s PayPass digital wallet soon to arrive; another...

16 hours ago by Philip Charles Cohen via Facebook on PayPal takes phone-based payments to the high street
apexwm

Leslie Satenstein : Where have you ever seen Mozilla even mention this? Firefox is the most popular browser in the GNU/Linux OS, so I don't see...

17 hours ago by apexwm on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
songmaster

SHleG: Do you remember building a clockwork scorpion kit (I'm pretty sure I have a photo of it somewhere) — I think it was called something like...

19 hours ago by songmaster on Software with everything
Chris Wortman

Good I love Yahoo! Their search engine is getting better than Google as of late. I find more of what I want on the first page, and usually within...

19 hours ago by Chris Wortman via Facebook on Linux Mint 13 ramps up for KDE release
PatrickG

openhgs has made the point for Windows 8 multiple monitors without realising it! With Windows 7 you have to switch the mouse and so your focus...

21 hours ago by PatrickG on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Leslie Satenstein

Mozilla has threatened to stop supporting Linux. I guess that UBUNTU is going with another browser. I indicated that if Mozilla stops supporting...

23 hours ago by Leslie Satenstein via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
Andy Bolstridge

Much as I abhor Microsoft's licensing practices, this is almost certainly down to purchasing IT equipment via 3rd party consultants - you get the...

23 hours ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Jack Schofield

@openhgs Windows users have had multiple desktops since Linus started writing Linux. They just haven't shipped as standard because not enough...

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Jack Schofield

@Phil at Cloud4 What, Microsoft gets £1,200 per PC and £1,622 per server? Gosh, I'm amazed....

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
craigsc

You guys have no idea what is going on at Autonomy. Autonomy could have been a much more profitable organization. The sales operations at Autonomy...

2 days ago by craigsc on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Moley

How does this impact on dual or multi booting? Seems to me to more or less prohibit this, from Windows 8 anyway. Will Grub 2 recognise Windows 8,...

2 days ago by Moley on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I don't understand why there cannot be a slight pause during the boot process so the user can press a key. Many operating systems do this, even if...

2 days ago by apexwm on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
Gavin Goodman

You can now buy the Xi3 modular computer in the UK at http://www.ocdistribution.com . This can be bought with the Tand3m software, pricing and...

2 days ago by Gavin Goodman on CES 2012: Xi3 microSERV3R
Phil at Cloud4

I agree: Mike Lynch can clearly build a business and manage strategy. I suspect the exit of Mike is more likely the end of a planned handover...

2 days ago by Phil at Cloud4 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Phil at Cloud4

This is unbeleivable government wastage with only one winner... Microsoft 1 - Tax payer Nil!

2 days ago by Phil at Cloud4 on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Mispam

So what do you do when you can't boot into windows? Why can't I just hold Shift while I power up instead of having to boot into windows and click a...

2 days ago by Mispam on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I've also seen that Mac OS X for Intel machines is supposed to run in VirtualBox, which would also be a nice solution. I've never tried it though.

2 days ago by apexwm on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows