Could IBM-PeopleSoft deal stave off Oracle?

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Topics

IBM, Peoplesoft

NEWS

PeopleSoft will bundle its future business applications with IBM's infrastructure software as part of a billion-dollar technology and marketing agreement between the two companies.

At its Connect 2004 customer conference in San Francisco, PeopleSoft said on Tuesday that it will integrate its enterprise applications with IBM's WebSphere middleware line, including IBM's Java application server, portal, and business process integration software. The two companies will also work to optimise PeopleSoft's applications to run on IBM's DB2 database and migrate PeopleSoft's development tools to the IBM-backed Eclipse open-source development tool programme.

As part of the multiyear deal, PeopleSoft intends to ship IBM WebSphere middleware components with its applications at no extra cost to customers. The two companies did not commit to a start date for the bundled offering.

At a joint press conference at PeopleSoft's annual conference, PeopleSoft chief executive Craig Conway said his company turned to IBM because it realised it lacked sufficient expertise in middleware, the software plumbing needed to connect business applications. To meet customer's needs, PeopleSoft needed a wide range of middleware infrastructure products, he said.

"This is the most ambitious, most aggressive announcement from IBM and PeopleSoft," Conway said. "Maybe the most ambitious from the enterprise applications business ever."

Conway also said the arrangement was not a skin-deep "press release announcement", noting that the letter of intent alone was more than 70 pages. The two companies will be dedicating people to joint development and expanded sales and marketing efforts, he said.

The companies will bring out tightly integrated products in regular intervals over the next few years, according to Conway and Steve Mills, senior vice-president in charge of IBM's software business.

Oracle problem remains
Asked whether he was worried about the new partnership being at risk if PeopleSoft is acquired by Oracle, Mills said, "I'm not worried at all. Nobody knows the outcome of what that will be."

When Oracle first launched its unsolicited bid to acquire PeopleSoft, some industry observers speculated that IBM could step in as a "white knight" and buy PeopleSoft, an idea that Mills rejected. IBM's strategy is to partner with application providers and sell the underlying middleware, hardware and services to run those applications.

Analysts said the IBM partnership is not likely to have a large effect on Oracle's ongoing assault, though there is symbolic value to the deal.

"For PeopleSoft, this is an important vote of confidence from their most important partner," said Jim Shepherd, an analyst at AMR Research. "But it doesn't solve the underlying Oracle problem at all."

However, Meta Group analyst Barry Wilderman noted that the partnership could make an Oracle acquisition more difficult because PeopleSoft's applications will be built around IBM's technology, which competes with Oracle's own middleware line.

Aiming at NetWeaver
The closer integration between IBM's middleware and PeopleSoft applications will give customers more flexibility to modify PeopleSoft products and connect to other systems, the executives said. Because IBM's products are based on Java and Web services standards, customers will be able to plug PeopleSoft applications to other middleware products from other infrastructure software providers such as Tibco and BEA Systems, according to Mills.

The IBM partnership is a direct response to SAP NetWeaver middleware initiative, which SAP launched last year. Conway said that by going with IBM, PeopleSoft's applications will be gaining a more mature product than NetWeaver.

"NetWeaver began as a limitation in SAP's own architecture," Conway said at his morning keynote speech on Tuesday. "You have to hand it to SAP for promoting its limitation as an advantage."

For IBM, the PeopleSoft deal represents a major addition to its partner program to recruit more application providers to use IBM's middleware. IBM already had development partnerships with SAP and Siebel as well as hundreds of smaller independent software vendors in specific industries.

But Mills said the deal with PeopleSoft represents a deeper commitment than existing application partnerships.

"We're not working to do a two-headed architecture. PeopleSoft is making choices," Mills said. "Our approach is to make the middleware invisible in the context of an application purchase but make the pluggable points visible."

The partnership expands on a deal that the two companies signed last year, in which PeopleSoft enlisted IBM to help port PeopleSoft applications to Linux. The new arrangement calls for closer technical integration, as well as a joint marketing and sales initiative, according to the companies.

PeopleSoft and IBM intend to sign a definitive agreement governing the deal in the fourth quarter this year.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

7 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

10 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

13 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

18 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

1 day ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint