Q: We're coming up on the 10th anniversary of Windows 95's launch. You said that event generated the most excitement of any Microsoft product launch. Can you recapture some of that excitement with Longhorn?
Ballmer: I think Longhorn is going to be the biggest release we have done since Windows 95. It's going to be a big thing, but I don't think we should have expectations that we will have people lined up at midnight to buy a copy, necessarily, despite the fact that Longhorn is a huge deal. I think it's bigger than anything else we've ever done -- except Win95.
In a sense, technically, it's much bigger than Windows 95. But with Windows 95, you kind of had an alignment of the sun, the moon and the stars, right? There was no Internet to speak of yet. All of the action was still on the client. Win95 was a merger of MS-DOS and Windows, which in itself was a big event. There was something in it for hardware makers, there was something in it for software makers. There was kind of an alignment of events that made the launch much bigger than the product itself -- things outside of Microsoft's control, things that we were the beneficiaries of. I'm not sure all of the stars will align for Longhorn, but it's a huge release and it will drive the consumer market.
So what is the buzz in the industry now? Is there something that Longhorn can ride?
Ballmer: I think it's still around the Internet and intelligence at the edge of the Internet. We'll certainly ride that -- and search and visualisation and finding things. Digital entertainment, finding things you are interested in, and processing at the edge of the Internet. Longhorn is squarely in the middle of those trends.
What about for business buyers? What's your pitch to those customers? Why should they buy Longhorn?
Ballmer: The dynamic is that the end user gets excited about it because they use it at home. And all business decision makers and IT people are end users. It's very rare when you find these organisations that don't have the latest releases. But all of their senior people would be without those releases at home.
It's sort of like a flywheel that you have to set in motion. You have to get the end users excited. The end users are excited by the new shell, the new visualisation capabilities, the new organisation and searching capabilities -- those should excite end users. The new user interface -- kind of sexy, kind of cool. The media enhancements should excite end users.
Then, the IT guys are the gatekeepers. Are they going to get excited or do they see a problem? Just look at what we have done for security and manageability. Those things are potentially exciting. Business decision makers want application compatibility. There's got to be something there for everybody. That's what sort of cranks the flywheel.
But getting that flywheel going means you're relying on that consumer pull-through?
Ballmer: If you look at Windows XP or any major Windows phenomenon, the first major step is to get all consumer PCs to come with that version of Windows, and I don't think Longhorn will be any different.







Talkback
Dear reader,
Fact: There's not even 1 version of ms-wares to be considered safe enough to use on the WWWeb (compared to the level of security of e.g. *BSD or Linux).
If one connects any ms xp system to the WWWeb with its default, ehhh, "firewall- & security- settings" it will "collect" up to 30 (!!!) spyware-programs and more than 10 virus, worms etc. - - - within 15 minutes...!
(This is no FUD - it is a proven _fact_ !)
Fact: There's no version of ms-"systems" available without "hidden files". They store passwords, (PGP) keyphrases, WWWeb-surf-history and much more...
See: http://www.fuckmicrosoft.com/content/ms-hidden-files.shtml
(Who _needs_ spyware anyway - when it is a build-in "ms-feature"... ;-) )
Fact: The "Longhorn" project has been announced (for years), but _still_ nobody knows when (if at all) it will be released.
(Vaporware by ms? I think it is. Typical ms-PR... It wouldn't be the first time - it's not gonna be the last...)
Fact: Many so called "new" ms products are not new at all - they are (as reversed engineering proves) the same old stuff in new wrappings.
Of course, made incompatible for use on old versions of ms-systems. One is forced to pay over and over and over again for essentially the same stuff...
Fact: Software "made" by ms is _way_ to expansive - compared to Open-Source wares, many O.S.-wares are for free !
To "produce" (that is: to copy) software-packets is extremely _cheap_ - ms-profits are 1000 % or more...
That besides the well known ms-"vendor-lock-in" stragegy...
Fact: ms still didn't manage to provide really effective protection against virus, worms, spywares, etc... (If they _ever_ will. I don't think so...)
As everybody should realize by now...
Conclusion 1: mr.s.balmer - like ms in its entirety - is incapable producing anything usefull, exept FUD, bloated talk and pure nonsense...
(That wouldn't even fool a retarded kid...)
Conclusion 2: ms should be considered a criminal organisation, and treated as such. Buying ms-stuff is sponsoring criminals...
Free advise: Use Open_Source software & systems.
It may take some time learning to work Open_Source systems - but it is certainly worthwhile the effort !
My current (Linux-)system was downloaded completely for free - it works perfectly and proofs to be really safe too !
Not even once I had to put up with virus, worms spyware or whatever.
It does everything I want it to do and a lot more...
You are quite right: I really don't like ms - for lots of reasons !
Thank you for reading my little comment,
Grtzz, Open_Sourceror.