Q: Speaking of new areas of competition, people are interesting in what's happening with Microsoft Business Solutions. Given that Microsoft and SAP at one time explored a merger, does Microsoft's growth strategy for MBS depend on future acquisitions?
Ballmer: No, I wouldn't say it depends on acquisitions at all, not at this stage. That's not to say we won't do acquisitions -- I wouldn't rule it out. But I think with the base we have with Navision and Great Plains, I think we have what we need to drive strong organic growth. We have had to work hard to get things integrated, but we are poised for the kind of growth that we planned on when we did the acquisitions.
There were rumours that Microsoft explored a deal with Siebel Systems. Any interest in the company at this point?
Ballmer: It's not an issue in which we're engaged.
You made a comment this morning poking fun at a Microsoft product name. Do you think Microsoft is good at marketing?
Ballmer: Sometimes. Sometimes we're very good. Sometimes I get tired of hearing, oh, they're only good at marketing. The product was Windows Mobile Security and Messaging add-on pack, or something. Bleeeeeehhhh...Couldn't we have figured out a way to name that more simply?
Apple said today that it is going to use Intel's processors. What do you think the implications are for Microsoft, particularly on the desktop?
Ballmer: I'll answer the question with a question, and that's probably all I'll do today. And that is: what would change assuming this happens? What changes in the competitive dynamic between Microsoft and Apple? Will there be more device drivers because of this? No, Apple has their device model, we have ours. Will there be more hardware manufacturers that build Apple machines -- other than Apple? That's a whole business model change. No reason to believe so. Frankly, if people wanted to do that, they could have been buying parts from IBM.
What changes? There's more applications available for Windows than there are Apple. All a chip change could do is probably slow that down because maybe there'd be a big disruption with your ISV community. I don't know -- we haven't gone through a chip change in our world.
There's more training, knowledge, management on how to implement networks. What changes? What changes? I don't know. You ask yourself the question and you can ask the question in the changes in the competitive dynamic. Today there's probably an order of magnitude, probably 50 copies of Windows sold for every copy of Mac, maybe a little more than that, maybe a little less than that. Ask yourself is there something fundamental that changes with this shift? And I'll leave that to you to answer.







Talkback
Dear reader,
Fact: There's not even 1 version of ms-wares to be considered safe enough to use on the WWWeb (compared to the level of security of e.g. *BSD or Linux).
If one connects any ms xp system to the WWWeb with its default, ehhh, "firewall- & security- settings" it will "collect" up to 30 (!!!) spyware-programs and more than 10 virus, worms etc. - - - within 15 minutes...!
(This is no FUD - it is a proven _fact_ !)
Fact: There's no version of ms-"systems" available without "hidden files". They store passwords, (PGP) keyphrases, WWWeb-surf-history and much more...
See: http://www.fuckmicrosoft.com/content/ms-hidden-files.shtml
(Who _needs_ spyware anyway - when it is a build-in "ms-feature"... ;-) )
Fact: The "Longhorn" project has been announced (for years), but _still_ nobody knows when (if at all) it will be released.
(Vaporware by ms? I think it is. Typical ms-PR... It wouldn't be the first time - it's not gonna be the last...)
Fact: Many so called "new" ms products are not new at all - they are (as reversed engineering proves) the same old stuff in new wrappings.
Of course, made incompatible for use on old versions of ms-systems. One is forced to pay over and over and over again for essentially the same stuff...
Fact: Software "made" by ms is _way_ to expansive - compared to Open-Source wares, many O.S.-wares are for free !
To "produce" (that is: to copy) software-packets is extremely _cheap_ - ms-profits are 1000 % or more...
That besides the well known ms-"vendor-lock-in" stragegy...
Fact: ms still didn't manage to provide really effective protection against virus, worms, spywares, etc... (If they _ever_ will. I don't think so...)
As everybody should realize by now...
Conclusion 1: mr.s.balmer - like ms in its entirety - is incapable producing anything usefull, exept FUD, bloated talk and pure nonsense...
(That wouldn't even fool a retarded kid...)
Conclusion 2: ms should be considered a criminal organisation, and treated as such. Buying ms-stuff is sponsoring criminals...
Free advise: Use Open_Source software & systems.
It may take some time learning to work Open_Source systems - but it is certainly worthwhile the effort !
My current (Linux-)system was downloaded completely for free - it works perfectly and proofs to be really safe too !
Not even once I had to put up with virus, worms spyware or whatever.
It does everything I want it to do and a lot more...
You are quite right: I really don't like ms - for lots of reasons !
Thank you for reading my little comment,
Grtzz, Open_Sourceror.