Amazon hit by pricing error

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Topics

E-commerce, Amazon

NEWS

Some customers looking for a good deal on an LCD TV at Amazon.com this week are now staring at a blank wall, in the latest high-profile e-commerce gaffe.

Due to apparent pricing error, the company has cancelled all orders for a Samsung LNR409D 40-inch LCD TV advertised and sold for $1,899 (£1,071) on 4 October. The Web site now shows the old price slashed out, with a new price of $2,954.99 from Amazon partner Vann's and $3,699.99 from Crutchfield &mdash an increase of as much as 95 percent.

The television, which comes with a high-definition-grade 1366 by 768 pixel resolution, a built-in HDTV tuner and a 170-degree viewing angle, sells for a similar price range on other retail sites.

Customers were notified via email that the company could not complete the delivery because the price of the television was originally incorrectly displayed. Amazon.com's Customer Service Department apologized for the inconvenience and cited Amazon's pricing policy, which is posted on the company's help section.

"At any given time, despite our best efforts, a small number of the millions of items on our site may be mispriced," Amazon says in its written policy. "We do, however, verify prices as part of our shipping procedures. If we discover that an item's correct price is higher than our stated price, we will, at our discretion, either contact you for instructions before shipping or cancel your order and notify you of such cancellation."

While incorrect pricing does happen from time to time in the online retail industry, several customers expressed anger and dismay at Amazon's handling of the situation. "We sold our TV because we thought we were going to get this 40" Samsung LCD through Amazon. I don't know why Amazon did not honour the order, they cancelled my order without any notification. Now I'm sitting at home without TV," customer Willy Khusyonny wrote on the site.

An Amazon customer known as "Music lover" in California was similarly riled.

"This, of course, after I received the email confirming my order," Music lover wrote on Amazon. "In any brick and mortar store, you'd pay the advertised price and walk out with the merchandise, even if they screwed up the price. Apparently this does not apply to big online merchants."

R. Hiltz wrote: "Amazon said we posted wrong price, now won't honour order. Sent an e-mail that said 'sorry we posted wrong price... your order has been cancelled'. How convenient!!! Of course no offer of anything for my inconvenience!...very poor business practice."

An Amazon representative said the company adheres to its posted policies but is looking into answering the complaints beyond the automated responses sent to customers.

Last month, UK retailer Argos refused to honour thousands of orders after accidentally offering a TV-DVD combo device for 49p on its Web site.

Legal experts agreed that Argos was within its rights, having covered itself with solid terms and conditions.

Talkback

Hm... I notice they don't say thy will correct the price if it's too high...

via Facebook 7 October, 2005 11:29
Reply

I was under the impression that it was UK law for a company to honour it's advertised price. Does this mean that any store (online or not) can cover it's pricing errors with its own terms and conditions? If it does, what's the point of retail law?

via Facebook 7 October, 2005 12:01
Reply

Uk law says no company can advertise an item at one price then raise the price after a purchase has been made by the customer..Argos and several other companies have been heavily fined for these kind of tactics where they offer a very low priced item to 'lure' customers in.

Also companies can be accused of deliberately 'embarrassing' a customer by charging a low price, then raising the price (many people would feel too embarrassed to say they could not afford the higher price and would just pay up).

All it takes is ONE person to sue via the small claims court for Amazon to stop using these dubious tactics (unless you really believe they can mis-type one price as a completely different one!!!! in which case I have a bridge to sell you in London).

And for those who didn't know if you DO have to sue a company to get what you are entitled to then you can now under UK law also claim up to 100x the price paid as punitive damages.

via Facebook 7 October, 2005 12:47
Reply

This is nothing new with online purchasing. Mail order lists always had E&OE (most invoices will as well).

Human/typing errors creep in all the time. I remember things like this happening in catalogues and magazines back in the 80's, and probably before then as well.

If something is really, obviously advertised at the wrong price (and a TV/DVD combo for 49p would fall into that category), then I wouldn't suprised or too upset if the company told me that it was a printing error and that I would either have to pay the real price or cancel the order.

It seems like the world is going sueing crazy! Just because the vendor is unable to fulfil the order at the incorrect price isn't grounds for nashing of teeth or wailing and claiming compensation! The only reason that it is "big news" is that with Internet technology, the word spreads quickly and thousands get to hear of the pricing error and try and exploit it. With mail order, it is not as common to get so many people affected because, if it was a catalogue, they'd probably send out an addendum, and when the people phone up to place the order, the person on the order hotline would probably notice the false price and query it with one of the first customers.

With everything automated in the Internet transaction, it is not unreasonable that the error may not be noticed until further down the chain...

As to the people who sold their old TV before they had a confirmed delivery date on the new one, more fool them...

via Facebook 7 October, 2005 13:41
Reply

Really? what is the world coming to? I bet all of the people complaining have NEVER made a mistake in their lives! And what's with all the "sue" culture?

As for the comments here about UK law, get your facts straight! Read the small print.

Error's are made all the time. Just because some companies will accept the loss in the name of customer service, doesn't mean every company has to!

In a real store the wrong price would be corrected after the first person got away with paying the cheaper price.

In an automated world these errors are usually only noticed much later on. Do you expect them to honour hundred's of incorrect orders and make huge losses? They wouldn't really make a loss since they would simply hike up the prices of other goods to make up the loss.

If you'd like a less automated service with fewer errors, go to a real store. Or ask amazon to change it's ways and hire 1000's more employees and then jack up it's prics to cover it's costs.

You choose!

via Facebook 7 October, 2005 14:04
Reply

Actually, its not covered by UK law. Firstly most companies have something in their T & C, that's guaranteed.

In shops, if something is priced incorrectly they DO NOT have to sell for that price if it is wrong, they have to take them off the shelf, then re price them. They cannot continue to sell them for that price and tell customers it is wrong.

The only time the shops would have to sell the product to you is if you can PROVE the price was deliberately marked wrong. Use your sense people. You won't go getting a TV/DVD combo from Argos for 49p, likewise you won't go getting a 40 inch HD LCD tv for just over £1000!

Just remember... if it sounds to good to be true...

via Facebook 9 October, 2005 14:19
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

26 minutes ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

53 minutes ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

3 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

5 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

6 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

6 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

6 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

8 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

9 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

15 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

17 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

17 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

18 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

19 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

20 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

20 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

21 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

21 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

21 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

22 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB