Antivirus firms consider protection against Sony DRM rootkit

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Antivirus firms are considering protecting their customers from the digital rights management software used by Sony on some CDs.

Kaspersky Labs has classed Sony's DRM software as spyware because, among other things, it can cause crashes and loss of data and it can compromise system integrity and security.

Explaining its decision, Kaspersky said it used the definition of spyware provided by the Anti-Spyware Coalition. Sophos is similarly scathing of Sony and is calling the software "ineptware".

The issue reaches much further than the individual PCs of those users who buy particular Sony CDs, say the antivirus companies. The DRM software uses what is known as a rootkit, which means that it is invisible to the operating system, to most anti-virus and security software and to IT departments trying to cope with security on user's desktop and notebook PCs.

Furthermore, say the antivirus companies, the software can be exploited by hackers and viruses and used to cloak any file from the operating system.

"The Sony rootkit can be used to hide any files from the operating system, so we think the way that Sony has implemented this is somewhat flawed," said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos. "The danger is that other malware may come along which exploits the Sony rootkit."

Due to what Cluley said is a lack of malicious intent on Sony's part, Sophos is not defining the rootkit itself as malware, preferring instead to refer to it as ineptware.

"We don't really believe this is malware and so we don't currently detect it," said Cluley. However, he said detection for rootkits like that used by Sony will be built into Sophos Antivirus version 6, due out in 2006. "This is potentially unwanted...

For more, click here...

Talkback

Sony's rootkit DRM is the worst kind of business hubris. Just because you can, doesn't always mean you should.

via Facebook 4 November, 2005 18:11
Reply

I think that the message here is: why don't anti-virus firms detect and stop rootkits in general?

And in case you're wondering if you have one. Here's a free little and nice tool that you might find helpfull:

http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/RootkitRevealer.html

And you might want to go here as well.

http://www.rootkit.com/

via Facebook 4 November, 2005 22:39
Reply

I think the best thing we can do is boycott ALL Sony products. Let's start with the Playstation 2 and PSP and then move on to SonyBMG records. I'm sick of Sony trying to ram their proprietary formats down our throat rather than support industry/open standards. The list includes Minidisc, ATRAC, Memory Stick, Betamax, Blu Ray DVD, HiFD, DAT, Sony Dynamic Digital Sound, UMD, SACD, ATRAC3. Go to the Sony music download site connect.com - you can only download music in ATRAC3 which only works on Sony hardware. Until 2004 they refused to even support MP3 in their hardware. Luckily for us Samsung, LG and the Chinese will put Sony's Consumer Electronics business out of business.

via Facebook 4 November, 2005 23:02
Reply

Well.....seems like a prime time to boycott all Sony products.

via Facebook 5 November, 2005 06:17
Reply

Christmas to come (and many more) should be a "No SONY Christmas"

I am satisfied that the stealth-software installed by Sony is facilitating further stealth attacks from hackers by hiding other malware from AV software, that the stealth-software communicates with a Sony site, which allows for future intrusions by Sony, even if this appears currently not to be the case. To make a clear statement about the undesirability of worldwide brands intruding the private sphere of computer users and exposing them to risks, it is necessary that the public react strongly. Though I welcome attempts to protect IP, as long as it doesn't lead to excessive prices, the methods should be certainly not of an endangering nature. Sony clearly has failed to inform the customers of the nature of their protection kit, and the fact that Sony is unwilling to accept that their technicians have failed to observe careful programming must be told in no uncertain terms. Their arrogant attitude about the scandal they have created and their undiscerning approach must be exposed by the means available.

The above combined with all kind of other monopoly attempts by Sony make action absolutely necessary. We have already one monopolist in the world of computers that grossly abuses its position - because the legislators have failed to protect consumers, not because of the monopolist’s actions alone. Further monopoly creation must absolutely be fought with all the means of the public, namely with their purchasing habits, since there seem to be no other impediments built into our legislation that effectively prevents it. It’s actually perverse that in an apparently otherwise well functioning democracy the public has to take action because their representatives are unable or unwilling to protect them.

via Facebook 5 November, 2005 09:56
Reply

Sony and Philips have a long history of implementing restricive code into their audio products, from the DCC to the mini disk, and now the CD. None of these technologies benefit the honest consumer. I stopped buying Philips products after their use of copy protection prevented me from copying my own music. Now I will endevour to never buy a copy protected CD. Although I do already own several CD's which will only play on my twelve year old CD player

via Facebook 5 November, 2005 10:48
Reply

These DRM programs violate the entire reason for purchasing CD's over music downloads. That is, when copied onto your computer the bit rate is low and quality is poor. The DRM tracks included on CD’s are reminiscent of cassette tape quality. My computer is a major component in my stereo system, and I copy all my CD's with a high bit-rate, lossless codec. Why pay for CD's that will have low quality music when it would be more convenient to download them from Napster or iTunes. Furthermore, poor quality DRM software like Sony's should be recognized by antivirus software. It causes my computer to behave in unexpected ways and it limits my rights to listen to music that I purchased legally. I want to play my legally purchased music however I want for my uses. Period.

via Facebook 5 November, 2005 18:08
Reply

A good article on Sony, DRM in general, peoples rights...

http://tinyurl.com/bug2e

via Facebook 7 November, 2005 12:52
Reply

Hiding something says it all. It is bad.

anyway, the software patch available on the sony bmg site, which will remove the cloaking abality, is a full version install ..

via Facebook 7 November, 2005 15:16
Reply

Errr, Sony is far from alone with this DRM thing. There's Hollywood, Microsoft, others. Most likely because of the money involved in it for them. If you don't like DRM (rootkit or not) then you better start asking for regulations that require "DRM protected" stickers on all products that have it so you know what and what not to buy.

via Facebook 8 November, 2005 00:11
Reply

Surely it can not be legal to violate my privacy in this way without a court order?

via Facebook 8 November, 2005 08:01
Reply

It just gets worse .. New Sony Digital Camera Installs Rootkit to Stop Photo Sharing

Many consumers are complaining about Sony's new Cybershot DSCP515 camera that installs digital rights management (DRM) software on the person's computer so they are unable to share their digital pictures with anyone.
The DRM is similar to the one which Sony recently came under fire for on its music CDs. That software installed rootkits on consumer's computers making them vulnerable to cyberattacks.

"Picture sharing flies under the radar when it comes to piracy," said Wilkerson. "People know about the dangers of music and movie piracy, but not about the dangers of sharing personal photos. What happens if a person takes a picture of Mariah Carey's latest CD? Think of the children."

The system which also makes it difficult to print out pictures has prompted complaints from consumers. "I tried to send a picture of my daughter to her Uncle Tim, but this window popped up saying it was blocked. I decided to print it out and mail it to him. There was a 14-page license agreement that printed out first that I had to fill out and fax to Sony so they could send me an authorization code to print out the picture."

via Facebook 14 November, 2005 09:58
Reply

THIS IS A SATIRE ARTICLE!
This is a satire article from bbspot.com.
http://www.bbspot.com/News/2005/11/sony_photo_sharing.html

Jebus.

via Facebook 21 November, 2005 17:44
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

subhorup

It simultaneously worries me and uplifts me that a self-proclaimed group of internet activists name themselves after Indian mythical figures....

3 hours ago by subhorup on Anonymous activists release PCAnywhere source code
naviathan

It's actually far easier to work anonymously on the internet than you think. With tools like Tor bouncing your traffic around the world before...

6 hours ago by naviathan on Anonymous activists release PCAnywhere source code
Agnostic_OS

1000272134 and bluedalmatian with you both there but then I'm still in 10.04 land (and happy with it)

6 hours ago by Agnostic_OS on Ten factors that make Ubuntu 11.10 a hit
apexwm

Interesting article and definitely see your points on the products mentioned. One of the top products for our Help Desk (approximately 20% of all...

14 hours ago by apexwm on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
Paul Hutchinson

Absolutely - this should obviously not be handled my isp - but handled by their hosting operator. What's been suggested here is that my isp police...

14 hours ago by Paul Hutchinson via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Techs UK

Looks like a great phone. I don't notice any deficiencies in WP7. used IOS before, that's pretty good. I don't spend much time in Apps, all i need...

17 hours ago by Techs UK on Nokia pins US 're-entry' hopes on Lumia 900
Larry Bloggy

Now with the help of these apps you are always synced with MS outlook while on the move. Just download apps like xobni or outlookreflex and get...

17 hours ago by Larry Bloggy via Facebook on Outlook Social Connector beta 2 and the LinkedIn connector
mike40g123

Your details are wrong. The version currently being made is the one with 2 USB ports, 256MB RAM and a network port. This is the Model B. The...

19 hours ago by mike40g123 on Raspberry Pi boards set to go on sale
Moley

The thing that has been puzzling me for quite a while is how Anonymous can remain anonymous whilst not only being active on the Internet but also...

1 day ago by Moley on Anonymous activists release PCAnywhere source code
Don Dilly

If what Semantec is saying is rue, that is even worse and shows a complete disregard for thier users. If what Anonymous claims is true and the...

2 days ago by Don Dilly via Facebook on Anonymous activists release PCAnywhere source code
MattChurchy

Didn't seem particularly biased to me either. Oh though you might have mentioned some other competitors with free search and email services...

2 days ago by MattChurchy on Time for an evil umpire: Google, Microsoft & privacy
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

James - exactly as much as anyone paid you for your comment; I don't feel that I need to say that I'm independant and unbiased, but just for you...

2 days ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Time for an evil umpire: Google, Microsoft & privacy
Carl White

Once they realise symantec are willing to pay real money, they will simply keep extorting, unless of course symantec/authorities can use the...

2 days ago by Carl White via Facebook on Symantec offered hackers $50k in source code sting
Jonathan Hassell

You can find more information on BS 8878 by Jonathan Hassell its lead-author at http://www.hassellinclusion.com/bs8878/ The page includes a...

2 days ago by Jonathan Hassell on BSI publishes first British web accessibility standard
servermanagement

Thanks for this list. Now I know, what to include on my system to make it more functional.

2 days ago by servermanagement on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
1000092626

What if it's a 4 car household? The point is, more bandwidth = more things you can do simultaneously, like streaming HD video in one room of the...

2 days ago by 1000092626 on Virgin Media beats 100Mbps schedule, hikes prices
Gary Burton

No point whatsoever increasing broadband download speed. unless ever server on the net has access to massively up rated throughput. The worlds...

2 days ago by Gary Burton via Facebook on Virgin Media beats 100Mbps schedule, hikes prices
Random_Error

They're also increasing their TV package prices, whether to help fund this or not.

2 days ago by Random_Error on Virgin Media beats 100Mbps schedule, hikes prices
Techs UK

How can you set it up wrong to intermittently connect? Should I be asking for more pay? Outlook/Exchange is a breeze.

3 days ago by Techs UK on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
JamesCheese

And how much did Microsoft pay you for that article?

3 days ago by JamesCheese on Time for an evil umpire: Google, Microsoft & privacy