Integrating physical surveillance with your IT security system

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

COMMENT

It's not just network security that companies are worried about today. It's also important to protect your physical assets. That includes IT equipment such as servers, workstations, and routers, but also includes non-IT assets: printed copies of documents, the money in the petty cash drawer, even the paintings on the walls.

Video surveillance has been a mainstay of companies' physical security systems for a long time, but today those systems can integrate into your network to allow you to monitor what's going on at the office from anywhere in the world, over the Internet. And there are solutions appropriate for the smallest businesses up to the enterprise level.

This isn't your father's CCTV
In the past, video surveillance was usually done via closed-circuit television systems. CCTV cameras plug into monitors for live monitoring or for recording to video tape. The quality is often poor and the cost for better quality equipment is relatively high. That's why the surveillance camera footage that you see of break-ins and robberies on the news are so often grainy black and white images that make it difficult or impossible to identify the perpetrators of the crime. Companies that use CCTV/VHS often keep the tapes only a short time, such as a week, due to cost of blank tapes and storage space issues.

Digital video recording presented a big step forward. Although the cameras are still closed circuit, they record to a digital video recorder (DVR), which is ,in essence, just a computer with a hard drive. That means better recording quality, no worry about changing tapes or tapes getting tangled up in the machine. It also makes it easier and cheaper to keep recordings for a longer period of time and to search the recordings for the event you want.

The next step was to connect the DVR to the network, so its recordings could be accessed and played remotely on another computer on the LAN or across the Internet. You could see the recordings immediately after they were made, but you still weren't seeing the events "live".

IP-based cameras solve that problem.

Smile! You're on candid Webcam.
The IP surveillance camera, also called a network camera, has a Web server built right into the camera itself. You can plug it into an Ethernet network or get a wireless model that communicates with your network via 802.11 technology. The Web server has its own IP address and can stream its images through your network to the Internet without being connected to a computer. You access the streaming video through a Web browser. The Web site should be password protected so that you have to know the IP address, user name and password to access the images.

Software that comes with popular models of network cameras will allow you to archive the video to a hard disk and monitor more than one camera on the same screen.

Starting small
Network cameras can be had for surprisingly low prices. For example, the Lorex Video Module is a very compact colour camera and standalone Web server combination that supports up to 640x480 resolution. The included camera is fixed but you can also get an optional pan/tilt head camera. The camera connects to the server module via USB, and the module connects to your router or switch via Ethernet. You can get a frame rate of up to 20 frames per second. The server module supports HTTP, TCP/IP, UDP, SMTP, PPPoE, DNS/DDNS, SNTP, BOOTP, DHCP, FTP, and SNMP. The fixed camera has an adjustable focus lens, a 350,000 pixel CMOS and infrared LED for night-time surveillance. This packages costs just $139.99 (£80.14) from a popular US vendor, Tiger Direct.

If you have more to spend, D-Link offers a family of network cameras. The DCS-6620G is a wireless model that has a 10x optical zoom lens, low light sensitivity, autofocus, and a built in microphone so you can listen as well as look. It has motorised pan, tilt and zoom that you can control remotely. You can zoom in on a person's face or a licence plate number for better identification. It records in both MPEG-4 and Motion JPEG formats. The audio functionality goes both ways, so that you can attach a speaker and talk to the subject remotely (for instance, when you have the camera mounted at a door to monitor who's ringing the bell). You can monitor via the Web or D-Link's IP surveillance software, which allows you to manage up to 16 cameras simultaneously. Of course, all these advanced features come at a price: around $800 to $900 in the US, depending on the vendor (for more info, see D-Link's Web site). Scalling up

CCTV systems are often limited in the number of cameras supported, especially at the low end of the cost scale. IP surveillance systems scale more easily. Even the lowest cost systems usually allow you to monitor several cameras at once, and this is a limitation of the software, not the hardware. IP systems can scale from one to thousands of cameras. It's also easy to increase storage capacity by upgrading or adding hard disks, and with compression, many hours of video can be stored on a typical hard disk.

CCTV usually uses coaxial cable and often requires new wiring, whereas most office buildings already have an Ethernet cable infrastructure. If you have to cable from scratch, it's less expensive to install Ethernet than coaxial cable. Wireless networking makes installation even easier. And because some network cameras can draw their power via the Ethernet cable, you don't have to have electrical outlets at the sites of the cameras.

As your business grows and your surveillance needs become more sophisticated, you can take advantage of many advanced features. The software can actually make intelligent decisions, based on your specified criteria, as to when to send alarms based on sensor input and event handling. Larger organisations may also need better archiving capabilities. IP-based surveillance scales well here, too. Whereas with VHS you must actually transport physical tapes if you want off-site storage for security or space reasons, with digital storage you can automatically backup the video data to a remote location for redundancy.

IT and physical security come together with IP-based surveillance, and it offers a cost-effective and scalable way to protect your company's assets.

Talkback

It should be noted in the above article that while the advents of IP based security products are great wireless still has someway to go and could potentially open you up to more breaches more easily then say cctv. I am an avid user of IP security products. I love them But I also understand the inhereent dangers in a secure setup where wireless ip security is considered.

via Facebook 2 March, 2006 16:50
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

3 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

6 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

9 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

13 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

23 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint