Why you should care about biometrics

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Topics

Biometrics, faq

FAQ

Biometrics can be described as either the study of biological measurements, or the use of those measurements to identify people or verify them. Voice, fingerprints, hand geometry, face, signature, iris and gait can all be measured and used for identification and authentication.

Surely a lot of this stuff is still theoretical?
Different technologies are at different stages of development. Fingerprint biometrics are well established; iris recognition has been around for a decade; but other systems, such as gait recognition — how a person moves — are still emerging. Other technologies at different stages of commercialisation include vascular pattern recognition, ear structure, odour and palm prints. There is an ongoing debate as to whether DNA can be used as a biometric, as identical twins split from the same fertilised egg share DNA.

Why should I care about it now?
Once the stuff of science fiction, biometrics are very much science fact as anyone who has flown to the US recently will know. The US recently introduced fingerprint scanning for all foreign visitors. For businesses, the proliferation of passwords has led to the development of single sign-on systems providing access to multiple applications. To reduce the security risk of having one point of access — for example, a single password that replaces multiple passwords — biometrics can be used instead. Some financial and military organisations institutions already use biometric recognition for identification.

Government schemes focusing on authentication have also driven biometrics development. The UK Government passed the Identity Cards Act this year and aims to introduce ID cards by 2008. Biometrics technology is also being used by the US Government in its US-VISIT border-control programme.

How do I collect biometrics?
Most biometrics are collected using sensors, which capture the biological information — an electronic thumbprint scan, for example — and convert it to digital form. When the thumbprint is captured, a template made up of a map of specific points of that feature is created. That template is then compared with a database of templates using algorithms, and a decision about the identity of the user can be taken when there is a close enough match between templates.

How reliable is biometric authentication?
Biometrics technology doesn't work in absolutes. The way to get a comparable match isn't by comparing stored pictures. The complexity of biometric data means there are instances of false positives — where an individual is identified incorrectly as someone else — and false negatives, where a person is incorrectly rejected by the system. Rather than saying absolutely whether two images of a biometric match, most systems work by calculating if the images are similar enough based on set limits. Each biometric system can be set with higher or lower authentication threshold, depending on the level of security necessary.

How could a criminal get around a biometric system? Could they cut off a finger and use it to gain entrance to a building?
That's a bit James Bond. Some biometrics systems can detect whether there is a pulse in the body part being presented, and your average security guard would probably notice if you started waving severed fingers around.

What are the privacy concerns around biometrics?
Privacy campaigners claim that it is difficult to control when, where and how biometric information is used. Biometric data showing medical information can be passed through to commercial systems or insurance companies, for example.

Identity theft is also a concern. If a password is stolen, it can be re-set, but if a biometric template is stolen, it is much more difficult to suspend use of the compromised information. Security experts claim that to a certain extent, biometric details are already compromised through being in the public domain, and design biometrics systems accordingly.

Talkback

A good example of a biometric vulnerability is when fingerprints are used for door access. A villain can, with a small amount of effort, take a fingerprint from a surface and use it to create a gummy fingertip that slips over their own, complete with pulse. The necessary equipment costs only tens of pounds. Where can they find a valid fingerprint? On the door handle, right next to the reader.

It is therefore alarming that the UK government is talking up biometrics as being secure, for applications like their ID card scheme, when the vulnerabilities are there for all to see. Once a villain is using your fingerprint, you can't just request a new one.

rbfindlay 8 November, 2006 07:31
Reply

As more legislation is enacted around the world that mandates the use of biometric data and as commercial use of biometrics increases, the market for biometric information security and assurance will increase greatly. Hackers will attack and eventually crack databases containing biometrics, even with the best applied encryption. If biometric input devices such as cameras and scanners are all that are needed to substantiate identity; then it is only a camera or a scanner that is needed to steal an identity…

The validating authority that has the biggest concern is the government. "HACKED" biometric databases are a very dangerous problem to national security efforts. If a system is ever hacked - all the data contained within is compromised (whether it is a single loss, 100 or 1000 persons) and is rendered worthless...

Eliminating the market value of the biometric identifiers in order to protect them from theft is better than firewalls, algorithms, security codes and encryption.

The correct thought process has just begun.

ajpolcha 9 November, 2006 03:03
Reply

Centralised databases of Biometrics will degrade our security. There have recently been cases of tax fraud deriving from mass theft of civil servants' personal details from government computers : how can anyone say such information will be secure, and keep a straight face?
What's more curious to me is that a geek forum should be interested merely in the question of technical robustness to the exclusion of the more fundamental question as to whether it's right for a government to keep a centralised file on each of its citizens.
I guess this thread is yet young!

Arkwright 14 November, 2006 09:25
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Paul Smyth

Is this classic FUD? One thing I would definitely have notice is a Mozilla threat to stop supporting GNU/Linux.

25 minutes ago by Paul Smyth via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
UnderINK

I agree with the previous commenter wholeheartedly. I couldn't say it better myself. This is very 'Big Brother'. And while I agree with protecting...

5 hours ago by UnderINK on European e-identity plan to be unveiled this month
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Nice to see that Turing's idea of a general purpose computer doing once-hardware-powered tasks in software is now universal ;-) Mary

10 hours ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Software with everything
Jason Burchell

seriously now. I've only bothered to read a small bit of the comments. do me and the rest of the world a favour. stop saying it does not work or...

14 hours ago by Jason Burchell via Facebook on Music industry negotiating over 24-bit downloads
Philip Charles Cohen

Read about it and weep, John Donahoe ... In addition to Visa’s V.me, there is now MasterCard’s PayPass digital wallet soon to arrive; another...

18 hours ago by Philip Charles Cohen via Facebook on PayPal takes phone-based payments to the high street
apexwm

Leslie Satenstein : Where have you ever seen Mozilla even mention this? Firefox is the most popular browser in the GNU/Linux OS, so I don't see...

19 hours ago by apexwm on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
songmaster

SHleG: Do you remember building a clockwork scorpion kit (I'm pretty sure I have a photo of it somewhere) — I think it was called something like...

20 hours ago by songmaster on Software with everything
Chris Wortman

Good I love Yahoo! Their search engine is getting better than Google as of late. I find more of what I want on the first page, and usually within...

21 hours ago by Chris Wortman via Facebook on Linux Mint 13 ramps up for KDE release
PatrickG

openhgs has made the point for Windows 8 multiple monitors without realising it! With Windows 7 you have to switch the mouse and so your focus...

23 hours ago by PatrickG on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Leslie Satenstein

Mozilla has threatened to stop supporting Linux. I guess that UBUNTU is going with another browser. I indicated that if Mozilla stops supporting...

24 hours ago by Leslie Satenstein via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
Andy Bolstridge

Much as I abhor Microsoft's licensing practices, this is almost certainly down to purchasing IT equipment via 3rd party consultants - you get the...

1 day ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Jack Schofield

@openhgs Windows users have had multiple desktops since Linus started writing Linux. They just haven't shipped as standard because not enough...

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Jack Schofield

@Phil at Cloud4 What, Microsoft gets £1,200 per PC and £1,622 per server? Gosh, I'm amazed....

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
craigsc

You guys have no idea what is going on at Autonomy. Autonomy could have been a much more profitable organization. The sales operations at Autonomy...

2 days ago by craigsc on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Moley

How does this impact on dual or multi booting? Seems to me to more or less prohibit this, from Windows 8 anyway. Will Grub 2 recognise Windows 8,...

2 days ago by Moley on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I don't understand why there cannot be a slight pause during the boot process so the user can press a key. Many operating systems do this, even if...

2 days ago by apexwm on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
Gavin Goodman

You can now buy the Xi3 modular computer in the UK at http://www.ocdistribution.com . This can be bought with the Tand3m software, pricing and...

2 days ago by Gavin Goodman on CES 2012: Xi3 microSERV3R
Phil at Cloud4

I agree: Mike Lynch can clearly build a business and manage strategy. I suspect the exit of Mike is more likely the end of a planned handover...

2 days ago by Phil at Cloud4 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Phil at Cloud4

This is unbeleivable government wastage with only one winner... Microsoft 1 - Tax payer Nil!

2 days ago by Phil at Cloud4 on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Mispam

So what do you do when you can't boot into windows? Why can't I just hold Shift while I power up instead of having to boot into windows and click a...

2 days ago by Mispam on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround