Vista migration plans unexpectedly ambitious

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
A survey conducted by ZDNet UK indicates that a large proportion of businesses that plan to upgrade to Microsoft Vista intend to begin the process in the next six months — even if the full migration takes several years.

The online survey of 1,305 IT professionals, conducted last week, found that 46 percent of respondents have plans to upgrade their desktop operating systems and the vast majority of those, or 41 percent of all respondents, plan to upgrade to Microsoft Vista. Fifty-one percent of those who plan to upgrade to Vista said they would begin the process in the next six months, rising to 70 percent in the next 12 months.

Most of the Vista upgrades will be software-only, with just 18 percent of these companies upgrading their hardware at the same time, despite the extra horsepower required by Vista over Windows XP. "We have approximately 1,500 PCs deployed, all running W2000. We have hardware refreshes every three years, and this will be the impetus for starting the rollout of Vista on the machines to be retired in 2007," said one IT manager.

"We will upgrade toVista Business as soon as possible, and will install more memory as a minumum," an IT consultant told us. "We are considering upgrading the graphics card so that we can benefit from Aero [Vista's new look and feel]."

One system administrator said his company would only upgrade once all their 35,000 laptops are upgraded to Core 2 Duo processor machines with 2GB of Ram.

And despite the early start, many expect the migration to last some time. "We will create the pilot build asap in partnership with Microsoft and then do application compatibility testing for up to 12 months," said the IT manager of a large pharmaceutical company with over 10,000 desktops. "And then it will take 18 months to deploy across the global organisation."

A significant number of respondents who plan to upgrade to Vista say they are nervous about drivers, stability and compatibility with existing systems. One company with several tens of thousands of PCs, which have just been upgraded to Windows XP SP1, said compatibility will be the main issue, "followed by complexity and ease to upgrade".

Sixty-eight respondents said their companies have Linux in their upgrade plans, most of these being small businesses. One company said it is upgrading its several hundred PCs to Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 with OpenOffice.org: "Novell Suse Enterprise provides all the means necessary to be the right choice for business purposes," said the respondent. "Windows Vista on the other hand makes it difficult to change the hardware and offers too many unnecessary features which are not used for business purpose and gives our staff too many reasons to waste time for checking out the new features. Furthermore the cost for upgrading to Vista and for maintaining the systems is much higher than with Suse".

The survey found a tiny number — just 15 — who have not upgraded to Windows XP, but these tended to be large organisations; six of them have annual IT budgets in excess of £10m. "We will be upgrading from Windows 2000 to Windows XP SP2. Vista does not appeal," said one, adding that the company he is working with is also upgrading Office 2000 to Office 2003. "That is all we need and it is proven. 300,000 desktops take a lot of managnig." Another said his company has similar plans for its several hundred PCs because "we are allowed XP and 2003 under our old MS Select agreement so that's all we get for free," despite a £1m-plus IT budget.

The survey also asked about office suite upgrades. About a third — 31 percent — of respondents said they have plans to upgrade their office suites, and of those, 85 percent includes Microsoft Office 2007 in their plans, 8.5 percent includes OpenOffice.org and only 1 percent includes Star Office, with a number still planning to upgrade to Office 2003.

Of those who plan to upgrade to Microsoft Office 2007, 55 percent say they will do so in the coming six months, 31 percent in the coming 12 months, 12 percent in the coming 24 months and 3 percent some time beyond 24 months. Of those who do not plan to upgrade to Microsoft Office 2007, a huge 48 percent cited cost as the reason.

The survey represents a significant number of desktops: 10 percent of respondents represent companies with over 10,000 desktops, and a total of 28 percent have over 1,000 desktops in their organisation. Thirteen percent of respondents have an IT budget of over £1m for 2007, with 6 percent controlling a budget of over £10m.

Talkback

clearly this report is biased in favor of microsoft's plan

our IT department experienced with all vista release candicates and set it up running, its impressive alright but we all voted not to upgrade, reason as follows:

1. Money: take just one calculator to figure this out. take $350 to get vista os, add in licensing fee per pc plus all the hardware upgrade fees which varies from $200 to $450, and of course deploying them takes manpower, there goes couple grands too. Putting this together to a sum - X, multiply by 1000, which is amount of desktops & laptops in the firm, there goes the rough number. Is microsoft gonna pay for it ? don't think so.

2. Time. Then again, time is money. Every major os deployment takes time, then we ask ourselves one single question- Why ? why go thru all the trouble to get this upgrades? the cost of maintenance is only a friction of upgrading/buying new system, everything runs fine why would we need to bother ourselves for? Whats so new about vista, reliability? more secure ? Yeah they say that to xp and i am not falling for that again. Bottom line- nobody needs it! if aero effect is whats selling, hey we can always get a mac, and its so much better!


so eh, vista migration plans ambitious? i don't see any sign of that anywhere. where did they conduct this survey anyways, in Redmond perhaps ? this report is totally bias, I want my 10 minutes back.

petermit 6 December, 2006 03:42
Reply

Dear Peter,

Thanks for your Talkback and the breakdown of your upgrade decision-making. You could be forgiven for being surprised by the results of this survey - we at ZDNet UK were.

The survey, conducted by us with no outside parties involved, was pretty surprising. Before we commissioned it, we thought that most readers would have made the same calculations that you did and would come away with the same conclusions. However, it seems that there is a genuine desire to upgrade to Vista out there.

We are still digging into the reasons and will be contacting some of the survery respondents to find out what their motivation is.

In the meantime - if you would like to see ZDNet UK's opnion on this survey - then check out our Leader article <a href="http://opinion.zdnet.co.uk/leader/0,1000002208,39284999,00.htm"> here </a>

Many thanks

Andrew Donoghue
Executive Editor, ZDNet UK

andrewdonoghue 6 December, 2006 10:02
Reply

Sorry - the link in my last message didn't seem to work for some reason - you can find our Vista leader here:

Leader: Choose your future vista carefully
http://opinion.zdnet.co.uk/leader/0,1000002208,39284999,00.htm

andrewdonoghue 6 December, 2006 10:22
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

11 minutes ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

3 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

4 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

4 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

5 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

6 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

12 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

14 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

14 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

16 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

17 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

17 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

18 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

18 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

19 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

19 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

19 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

19 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

19 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions