Security is more than just an overhead

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Topics

Security, ISC

COMMENT

Where they once held a relatively minor position in IT, information security professionals have finally started getting the recognition they deserve for their diversity of knowledge and skill. This ranges from a comprehensive view of compliance issues to proficiency in risk models with business and management instincts. Their influence is increasing and their audience growing, and business is beginning to accept that it is time to understand how to be responsible with information security risk.

Despite its growing influence, information security continues to be perceived as a necessary evil or cost to the business. All too often, this is the perspective of the individuals in the profession as much as the executives charged with funding it.

As information security professionals, we are unified in our motivation to avoid threats rather than advance business. Business executives may accept that selling online is dependent upon good security, but the broader information security picture is not appreciated.

It is time to change that thinking, and recognise that there is every opportunity to consider information security as a strategic tool for competitive advantage, increased shareholder value and better management of resources. Such change does not require new technical know-how or security solutions, but rather a new way of assessing them.

As information security professionals, we like to think we understand that security is about more than just technology, yet all too often our actions tell a different story. According to the (ISC)2 2005 Global Information Security Workforce Study, most of us are spending the majority of our time researching and implementing new technologies. In Europe, more than a quarter of respondents indicated that fighting political battles and selling our value to management were their most time-consuming activities, and more than 30 percent ranked them as their second most time-consuming. These findings suggest that our conversations revolve around threats rather than opportunity for the business.

We need to remind ourselves again and again that information security is not a technology issue — it's a people issue. We are reliant on people, their awareness, ethics and behaviour, and we must understand what they want to achieve if we are to accomplish the goals of business. This includes the employees who deliver our services and the customers who take advantage of them, as well as the senior executives and boardroom directors who grant us our budgets. We must make the effort to understand certain issues: changing organisational structures that increasingly embrace outsourcing; how our companies would like to take advantage of their business intelligence; how customers would like to interact with our businesses; evolving workflows; application management; development strategies, and so on.

We must also recognise that information security programmes reflect high levels of interdependence across the business. The security team from the top down should be capable of working collaboratively with business units — participating on strategy committees, assessing business objectives, presenting risk analyses and reporting common accomplishments in recognition of common objectives. A review of hiring practice is warranted to ensure a team that is capable of interfacing with the business, as well as implementing solutions.

Despite the amount of time seemingly spent justifying our presence, the profession should not begrudge this effort. For the most senior managers, up to 50 percent of their time should be spent on communicating and managing our contribution to the business. We must recognise that it is part of our job not only to manage upward, but outward. We cannot afford to stick within the comfort of our domain rather than concern ourselves with what motivates our stakeholders.

The opportunity for the information security profession is immense. Clearly we must continue to understand the evolving threat landscape coming from increasingly sophisticated criminal factions. We must also stay on top of the available technology to protect against these threats, recognising them as tools, rather than the focus of our jobs. Most importantly, however, we must recognise that our jobs are not only critical to the running of the business and protection of its assets, but also to its development and strength in the future. We are driving a change in the role of the security professional. Let us make the most of our influence.

John Colley is chairman of the European advisory board for the International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium (ISC) and can be seen at Infosecurity Europe 2007.

Talkback

John’s article is absolutely correct and is thought provoking. It’s very difficult to be positive about Information Security, especially when it’s viewed as a technical issue rather than one that the business should embrace. Reporting the information security status to senior management tends to be negative. Information Security professionals report bad news. It can’t be helped. If security is running smoothly then there is nothing to report, otherwise Information Security has a tendency to be reported in quantitative terms, such as the number of security incidents. We need to find another way.

One important factor to consider within a company is the positioning of the senior Information Security professional. If they are within the IT department, then it will be viewed by everyone as a technical issue. Sure, most of the security controls are within IT because that’s where most of the information is held, but the drivers are with the business. If the security of information is a business responsibility, and it can be traced back to business requirements, then funding becomes easier. When Information Security is within the IT department there is a tendency to take a technical approach. After all, IT people love technology; they will buy the most technologically advanced and shiniest piece of equipment to mitigate security vulnerabilities and treats. If one considers that IT doesn’t own business information, then IT can’t be responsible for its protection. If the business doesn’t get this and other roles and responsibilities correct before any outsourcing takes place, then it can be very difficult to manage the outsource contract.

345958 28 February, 2007 14:10
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Paul Smyth

Is this classic FUD? One thing I would definitely have notice is a Mozilla threat to stop supporting GNU/Linux.

48 minutes ago by Paul Smyth via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
UnderINK

I agree with the previous commenter wholeheartedly. I couldn't say it better myself. This is very 'Big Brother'. And while I agree with protecting...

5 hours ago by UnderINK on European e-identity plan to be unveiled this month
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Nice to see that Turing's idea of a general purpose computer doing once-hardware-powered tasks in software is now universal ;-) Mary

10 hours ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Software with everything
Jason Burchell

seriously now. I've only bothered to read a small bit of the comments. do me and the rest of the world a favour. stop saying it does not work or...

14 hours ago by Jason Burchell via Facebook on Music industry negotiating over 24-bit downloads
Philip Charles Cohen

Read about it and weep, John Donahoe ... In addition to Visa’s V.me, there is now MasterCard’s PayPass digital wallet soon to arrive; another...

18 hours ago by Philip Charles Cohen via Facebook on PayPal takes phone-based payments to the high street
apexwm

Leslie Satenstein : Where have you ever seen Mozilla even mention this? Firefox is the most popular browser in the GNU/Linux OS, so I don't see...

19 hours ago by apexwm on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
songmaster

SHleG: Do you remember building a clockwork scorpion kit (I'm pretty sure I have a photo of it somewhere) — I think it was called something like...

21 hours ago by songmaster on Software with everything
Chris Wortman

Good I love Yahoo! Their search engine is getting better than Google as of late. I find more of what I want on the first page, and usually within...

21 hours ago by Chris Wortman via Facebook on Linux Mint 13 ramps up for KDE release
PatrickG

openhgs has made the point for Windows 8 multiple monitors without realising it! With Windows 7 you have to switch the mouse and so your focus...

23 hours ago by PatrickG on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Leslie Satenstein

Mozilla has threatened to stop supporting Linux. I guess that UBUNTU is going with another browser. I indicated that if Mozilla stops supporting...

1 day ago by Leslie Satenstein via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
Andy Bolstridge

Much as I abhor Microsoft's licensing practices, this is almost certainly down to purchasing IT equipment via 3rd party consultants - you get the...

1 day ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Jack Schofield

@openhgs Windows users have had multiple desktops since Linus started writing Linux. They just haven't shipped as standard because not enough...

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Jack Schofield

@Phil at Cloud4 What, Microsoft gets £1,200 per PC and £1,622 per server? Gosh, I'm amazed....

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
craigsc

You guys have no idea what is going on at Autonomy. Autonomy could have been a much more profitable organization. The sales operations at Autonomy...

2 days ago by craigsc on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Moley

How does this impact on dual or multi booting? Seems to me to more or less prohibit this, from Windows 8 anyway. Will Grub 2 recognise Windows 8,...

2 days ago by Moley on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I don't understand why there cannot be a slight pause during the boot process so the user can press a key. Many operating systems do this, even if...

2 days ago by apexwm on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
Gavin Goodman

You can now buy the Xi3 modular computer in the UK at http://www.ocdistribution.com . This can be bought with the Tand3m software, pricing and...

2 days ago by Gavin Goodman on CES 2012: Xi3 microSERV3R
Phil at Cloud4

I agree: Mike Lynch can clearly build a business and manage strategy. I suspect the exit of Mike is more likely the end of a planned handover...

2 days ago by Phil at Cloud4 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Phil at Cloud4

This is unbeleivable government wastage with only one winner... Microsoft 1 - Tax payer Nil!

2 days ago by Phil at Cloud4 on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Mispam

So what do you do when you can't boot into windows? Why can't I just hold Shift while I power up instead of having to boot into windows and click a...

2 days ago by Mispam on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround